4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Appropriate laryngeal mask airway size for overweight and underweight children.

      1 , , , , ,
      Anaesthesia

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to compare conventional laryngeal mask airway sizing by weight with sizing by age in over- or underweight children. We studied 26 overweight (body mass index > 85th centile) and 26 underweight (body mass index < 15th centile) children. After general anaesthesia was induced, laryngeal mask airways sized by the patient's weight and by an ideal weight (estimated from the patient's age according to standardised tables) were inserted consecutively. In overweight children, oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly greater when the laryngeal mask was sized by the patient's actual weight. On the other hand in underweight children, it was significantly greater when sized by the ideal weight. In conclusion, laryngeal mask airway sizing according to the manufacturer's weight-based recommendation is to be preferred in overweight children, but laryngeal mask airway size by an ideal weight estimated from the patient's age is a better choice in underweight children.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Anaesthesia
          Anaesthesia
          1365-2044
          0003-2409
          Jan 2010
          : 65
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
          Article
          ANA6160
          10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06160.x
          19922510
          0bb83944-28b5-4820-b6fa-7652a1a852bc
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article