1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      SUPPORTING SMALLHOLDER COMMERCIALISATION BY ENHANCING INTEGRATED COORDINATION IN AGRIFOOD VALUE CHAINS: EXPERIENCES WITH DAIRY HUBS IN KENYA

      , ,
      Experimental Agriculture
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          SUMMARY

          Recent literature suggests that to make value chains in changing agrifood systems in sub-Saharan Africa more inclusive, intermediary institutions should foster coordination. The hub concept has been applied as such an intermediary institution that coordinates advisory services, input supply and smallholder access to markets. This study unravels hub coordination in smallholder dairy in Kenya, conceptualising the hub as a mix between a broker of relationships, a one-stop-shop for services and a cluster of producers and service providers, enabling horizontal coordination (between smallholders) and vertical coordination (between smallholders and value chain actors and service providers). Findings indicate that, in resolving challenges that limit smallholders’ integration in value chains, synergies emerged as the hub combined different types of horizontal and vertical coordination. This was done by simultaneously organising clusters of farmers and input and service providers (clustering role) and actively facilitating delivery (broker and one-stop-shop role), where the hub structure stimulated the matching of demand (better articulation) to supply (better organised access). However, tensions emerged in the combination of horizontal and vertical coordination as farmer organisations as hub operators had to balance a role as an honest broker between farmers with the intent of enhancing collective action and as a business-oriented entity which resulted in the exclusion of some farmers who cannot deliver the quantity and quality required to minimise coordination costs. Given these tensions and capacity problems of farmers’ organisations, complementary intermediary arrangements may be necessary to fulfil some coordination roles.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            ORCHESTRATING INNOVATION NETWORKS.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Smallholder Participation in Contract Farming: Comparative Evidence from Five Countries

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Experimental Agriculture
                Ex. Agric.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0014-4797
                1469-4441
                April 2017
                June 20 2016
                April 2017
                : 53
                : 2
                : 269-287
                Article
                10.1017/S0014479716000375
                0bd69fee-9222-412b-ae62-c1d690208515
                © 2017

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article