1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prognostic value of quantitative PET/CT in patients with a non-small cell lung cancer and another primary cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The staging and management of patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the setting of recently diagnosed other (metachronous or synchronous) primary cancer are challenging. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to test our hypothesis that baseline FDG PET/CT parameters, including whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTV WB), total lesion glycolysis (TLG WB) and maximum standardised uptake value (SUV maxWB) are associated with overall survival (OS) of such patients.

          Materials and Methods

          A total of 110 NSCLC patients (52 men and 58 women, aged 68.6 ± 7.8 years) with other primary malignant cancers who had baseline FDG PET/CT scans were retrospectively reviewed. MTV WB, TLG WB and SUV maxWB were measured. Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test and Cox regression models were used to assess the association of OS with FDG PET/CT parameters and clinical risk factors.

          Results

          Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate Cox regression models demonstrated significant associations of OS with ln(MTV WB), ln(TLG WB), ln(SUV maxWB), TNM stage, and treatment type (surgery versus no treatment). Multivariable Cox regression models showed a significant relationship of OS with ln(MTV WB) ( HR = 1.368, P = 0.001), ln(TLG WB) ( HR = 1.313, P < 0.001) and ln(SUV maxWB) ( HR = 1.739, P = 0.006), adjusted for age, treatment type, tumor histology, and TNM stage. TNM stage was not significantly associated with OS when MTV WB, TLG WB or SUV maxWB were included in the multivariable models.

          Conclusion

          MTV WB, TLG WB, and SUV maxWB from baseline FDG PET/CT are individually associated with OS of patients with both NSCLC and other primary malignant tumors; independent on age, treatment type, tumor histology and TNM stage.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          8201017
          6186
          Nucl Med Commun
          Nucl Med Commun
          Nuclear medicine communications
          0143-3636
          1473-5628
          14 November 2016
          February 2017
          01 February 2018
          : 38
          : 2
          : 185-192
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Radiology, BenQ Medical centre, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
          [2 ]Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
          [3 ]Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
          [4 ]Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
          [5 ]Cancer Registry, University Of Chicago, Chicago, USA
          [6 ]Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Illinois
          [7 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030001, China
          Author notes
          Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Yonglin Pu, M.D. & Ph.D., Address: Department of Radiology, 5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC 2026, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA, Office Phone:773-834-7629, Office Fax:773-702-1161, ypu@ 123456radiology.bsd.uchicago.edu
          Article
          PMC5239728 PMC5239728 5239728 nihpa828951
          10.1097/MNM.0000000000000627
          5239728
          27922540
          0c0e116d-cc2d-4451-b45b-92f182c1ec7d
          History
          Categories
          Article

          FDG,non-small cell lung cancer,survival analysis,metabolic tumor burden,synchronous cancer,metachronous cancer

          Comments

          Comment on this article