9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ruxolitinib discontinuation syndrome: incidence, risk factors, and management in 251 patients with myelofibrosis

      letter
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 1 , 1 , 20 , 21 , 7 , 8 , 22 , 18 , 11 , 21 , 13 , 12 , 20 , 1 , 1 , 10 , 21
      Blood Cancer Journal
      Nature Publishing Group UK
      Myeloproliferative disease, Haematological diseases

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, RRuxolitinib (RUX) is the first JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor (JAKi) approved for the treatment of splenomegaly and symptoms related to myelofibrosis (MF) 1,2 . By JAK1 inhibition, RUX reduces the production of several inflammatory cytokine (IL-6, IL-1rα, MIP-1β, TNF-β, and CRP), whereas myelosuppression is mainly exerted through JAK2 inhibition. Despite considerable clinical efficacy, some patients fail to obtain and/or maintain a stable response or are intolerant to RUX 3,4 . Thus, ~40% of patients discontinue RUX within 3 years of therapy 5 . In the early phase I/II study of RUX in MF, most patients experienced relapse of their symptoms and worsening splenomegaly after RUX discontinuation 1 , and life-threatening adverse events (AEs) occurred in 5 out of 47 patients, including respiratory distress, septic-like shock and disseminated intravascular coagulation-like syndrome. These events, attributed to an acute rebound of cytokine storm, were defined as RUX discontinuation syndrome (RDS), and careful tapering under close physician supervision was suggested as a preventive strategy 6 . Further cases of severe AEs attributed to RUX discontinuation have been subsequently described, despite a careful stepwise reduction of RUX 7–9 , also in the setting of patients that received RUX as a bridge to transplantation 10,11 (Supplemental Table 1). RDS typically presents within 3 weeks from RUX discontinuation, apparently without relation with RUX dose, and seems to improve after RUX reintroduction. However, these findings were based on case reports or limited series of patients, and available data are insufficient to estimate the impact of RDS in routine clinical practice. The current study aims to investigate in a real-world context: (1) modalities of RUX discontinuation; (2) incidence, timing, and severity of RDS; (3) outcome and risk factors associated with RDS. In 2016, a clinical network was established to collect information about RUX therapy in MF 12 . This network now includes 22 academic hematology centers where MF patients are followed by hematologists with specific MPN-driven practice. A specific survey was conducted in all participating Centers with the scope to obtain comprehensive information regarding timing/modalities of RUX discontinuation, and subsequent outcome. RDS included all new symptoms that occurred within 21 days from RUX discontinuation and were interpreted by the treating Hematologist as caused by RUX discontinuation. Based on the previous definition, RDS was graded as mild if no intervention was required, moderate if symptoms required medical interventions including RUX restarting, steroids, oral analgesics, and severe if intravenous medications, hospital admissions, splenectomy, or delaying of hematopoietic allogeneic transplantation (HCT) were needed 11 . At data cutoff date (1 May 2020), 700 RUX-treated MF patients were included in the database. After a median follow-up from RUX start of 36.1 months, 251 (35.9%) patients discontinued RUX and were evaluable for RDS. At the time of decision to stop RUX, 53% of these 251 patients were older than 70, 68.5% presented anemia and 45.8% had large splenomegaly (>10 cm below costal margin, BCM); 27.5% of patients had a MPN-10 Total Symptom Score > 20. Failure (lack/loss of response, or leukemic transformation) was the main cause of RUX stop (60.6%), whereas AEs (mainly hematological) and other reasons caused RUX discontinuation in 28.6% and 10.8% of patients, respectively. In most cases, AEs were concomitant to failure/suboptimal responses. Indeed, at the time of RUX stop, 36.7% of patients presented a platelet count below 100 × 109/l and 31.5% had transfusion-dependent anemia. Also, in 7.6% of the patients, a grade 2–3 infectious event was recorded before RUX discontinuation. RUX daily dose (mg BID) was: 5, 10, 15, or 20 in 46.2, 23.1, 15.6, and 15.1% of patients. Notably, at the time of RUX start, the dose of RUX was 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg BID in 27.9, 17.2, 18.4, and 36.5% of patients. The concomitance of AEs with a poor response to RUX most likely led to a progressive RUX dose reduction in many patients; hence, at the time of the final decision to discontinue the drug, many patients were already taking low doses. In 162 patients, RUX was abruptly discontinued. In the remaining 89 patients (35.5%), RUX dose was gradually decreased before discontinuation. Tapering was associated with hydroxyurea and/or corticosteroids in 34 (38.2%) patients. RUX tapering pattern was very variable among Centers and consisted of dose reductions of 5 or 10 mg per day at variable intervals, ranging from a dose reduction every 30 days to one every 3 days. The median duration of tapering was 14 days (range 3–60). No association was found between tapering use and clinical/laboratory parameters or RUX dose at the time of RUX discontinuation. However, tapering use was consistent within the single Centers, and was regularly performed in only 4 Hematology Centers (Supplemental Fig. 1). RDS occurred in 34 (13.5%) patients after a median time of 7 days (range, 2–21) from RUX stop. The incidence rate of RDS was 0.7 per 100 patient-days. RDS was mild in 21 (61.8%) patients. Mild RDS consisted in symptomatic spleen increase in 62% of the cases, whereas 9.4% of patients experienced a flare in constitutional symptoms (fever, weight loss, night sweats); in six patients (28.6%), other MF-related symptoms (fatigue, itching, bone pain, abdominal discomfort) occurred. The median time from RUX stop to mild RDS was 10 days (3–21). After RUX discontinuation, ten patients (47.7%) did not receive further therapy because of progression to blast phase and/or unfitness; eight patients (38%) were treated with different therapies (including demethylating agents, splenectomy, and HCT), whereas three patients (14.3%) received a JAKi, after a median time of 9 months. A moderate RDS occurred in 10 out of 34 (29.4%) patients, after a median time from RUX stop of 8.5 days (range, 3–20) and comparable to mild RDS. Moderate RDS was represented by symptomatic spleen enlargement (seven patients), or constitutional symptoms appearance/increase (three patients). RDS therapy consisted in corticosteroids (eight patients) or enrollment in a clinical trial with a non-JAKi. Three patients received RUX rechallenge after an average time of 2.6 years from first discontinuation. A total of three cases of severe RDS were observed and consisted of: spleen rupture causing splenectomy (case 1); fever, dyspnea, confusion, and dizziness requiring hospitalization (case 2); severe ARDS treated in intensive care unit (case 3) (Supplemental Figure 2). Severe RDS occurred within 48 h after RUX discontinuation and the patient’s condition rapidly improved after RUX rechallenge. No fatal cases of RDS were observed. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, only platelet count <100 × 109/l (HR 2.98, 95%CI 1.29–6.90) and spleen ≥10 cm BCM (HR 2.03, 95%CI 1.01–4.17) at RUX stop were significantly associated with higher probability of RDS (Fig. 1a). Overall, 19 out of 251 patients (7.6%) re-started RUX after drug discontinuation. RDS was significantly associated with the need of RUX rechallenge, with 8/34 (23.5%) RDS patients eventually resuming RUX (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1b). Notably, the occurrence of RDS did not significantly influence overall survival. Fig. 1 Risk factors at ruxolitinib discontinuation associated with subsequent discontinuation syndrome (a) and probability of RUX rechallenge according to RDS (b). a Risk factors were identified with a Cox regression model. In order to use a parsimonious model owing to the small number of events, only variables with p value < 0.05 in univariate analysis were considered for multivariable analysis. Moreover, collinearity amongst variables was detected by means of Pearson correlation test. Ultimately only platelet count and spleen size were considered in multivariable analysis and both remained statistically significant. b Given that RDS is a time-dependent covariate, the curves were obtained with the Simon-Makuch technique to take the change in an individual’s covariate status over time into account. One week from ruxolitinib stop, which is the median time from RUX stop to RDS occurrence, was chosen as the landmark time point. Overall, this study shows that symptoms and/or splenomegaly significantly increase in ~15% of patients soon after RUX stop, with sometimes considerable clinical deterioration in already frail patients. This frequency is consistent with the report by Shanavas et al. 11 , who found that 10 out of 66 (15%) patients treated with RUX before HCT developed RDS. RDS was mild to moderate in eight cases, and severe in two cases, eventually leading to HCT delay. In our cohort, the incidence of severe RDS appeared to be lower (1%) than initially reported (11%) 6 . Whether this difference is related to the smaller number or to a more advanced disease of patients enrolled in phase I–II study, compared with those treated with RUX in subsequent years, remains to be defined. Indeed, compared with patients included in the phase I/II trial, that were all at intermediate-2/high risk and mostly (92%) affected by severe splenomegaly, this study included many patients that started RUX while at intermediate-1 risk (47.2%), with a lower incidence of baseline large splenomegaly (63.3%) or thrombocytopenia (15.4%). Also, owing to its retrospective nature, an underestimation of RDS cannot be fully ruled out in the present study. However, both experiences highlight that re-expansion of MF after RUX can be sudden and potentially life-threatening, and that a rapid diagnosis of RDS is critical, as the reintroduction of RUX can quickly improve clinical status in most cases. Since RDS is an early event, any other therapy should be started as close as possible to RUX discontinuation, as already observed and indicated in the context of RUX as bridge to HCT 13 . Importantly, the possible occurrence of RDS may be anticipated in a substantial fraction of patients that discontinue RUX during the screening phase of clinical trials enrolling patients with failure or suboptimal response to RUX. In these cases, careful monitoring, and disclosure of potential risk of RDS to the patients are recommended. This real-world experience also highlights that, despite specific indications 14 , prevention strategies of RDS were infrequent and inconsistent across different Centers, with only a minority of patients gradually reducing the dose or introducing prophylactic corticosteroids. This has probably prevented the detection of a correlation between tapering and RDS reduction. Despite these limitations, implementation and standardization of discontinuation strategies should be pursued for a better RDS prevention in the future. Finally, we observed that the risk of RDS was significantly higher in patients with a greater burden of the disease at the time of discontinuation. Particularly, the increased incidence of RDS in patients with large splenomegaly may indicate that unexpectedly, in at least some patients deemed refractory to RUX, the maintenance of JAK2 inhibition has a non-negligible activity. In this context, the re-use of a JAKi may be particularly reasonable. The reintroduction of RUX has already shown to achieve some clinical responses 15 . Possibly, second-generation JAKi may have an even greater clinical relevance in this setting. In conclusion, these results confirm the need for a careful surveillance of MF patients at the time of RUX discontinuation. A quick switch to alternative treatments, if clinically indicated, should be planned particularly for patients who stop RUX with large splenomegaly. In the absence of available alternatives, the occurrence of RDS may indicate a residual disease control activity and identify a population that can still benefit from JAK2i. Supplementary information Supplemental Table 1 Supplemental Figure 1 Supplemental Figure 2

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis.

          Myelofibrosis is a Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with cytopenias, splenomegaly, poor quality of life, and shortened survival. About half of patients with myelofibrosis carry a gain-of-function mutation in the Janus kinase 2 gene (JAK2 V617F) that contributes to the pathophysiology of the disease. INCB018424 is a potent and selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK2 inhibitor. We conducted a phase 1−2 trial of INCB018424 in patients with JAK2 V617F−positive or JAK2 V617F−negative primary myelofibrosis, post–essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, or post–polycythemia vera myelofibrosis. A total of 153 patients received INCB018424 for a median duration of more than 14.7 months. The initial dose-escalation phase established 25 mg twice daily or 100 mg once daily as maximum tolerated doses, on the basis of reversible thrombocytopenia. A dose-dependent suppression of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), a marker of JAK signaling, was demonstrated in patients with wild-type JAK2 and in patients with the JAK2 V617F mutation. We studied additional doses and established that a 15-mg twice-daily starting dose, followed by individualized dose titration, was the most effective and safest dosing regimen. At this dose, 17 of 33 patients (52%) had a rapid objective response (≥50% reduction of splenomegaly) lasting for 12 months or more, and this therapy was associated with grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events (mainly myelosuppression) in less than 10% of patients. Patients with debilitating symptoms, including weight loss, fatigue, night sweats, and pruritus, had rapid improvement. Clinical benefits were associated with a marked diminution of levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines that are commonly elevated in myelofibrosis. INCB018424 was associated with marked and durable clinical benefits in patients with myelofibrosis for whom no approved therapies existed. (Funded by Incyte; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00509899.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

            Treatment options for myelofibrosis are limited. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib, a potent and selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor, as compared with the best available therapy, in patients with myelofibrosis. We assigned 219 patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis to receive oral ruxolitinib or the best available therapy. The primary end point and key secondary end point of the study were the percentage of patients with at least a 35% reduction in spleen volume at week 48 and at week 24, respectively, as assessed with the use of magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. A total of 28% of the patients in the ruxolitinib group had at least a 35% reduction in spleen volume at week 48, as compared with 0% in the group receiving the best available therapy (P<0.001); the corresponding percentages at week 24 were 32% and 0% (P<0.001). At 48 weeks, the mean palpable spleen length had decreased by 56% with ruxolitinib but had increased by 4% with the best available therapy. The median duration of response with ruxolitinib was not reached, with 80% of patients still having a response at a median follow-up of 12 months. Patients in the ruxolitinib group had an improvement in overall quality-of-life measures and a reduction in symptoms associated with myelofibrosis. The most common hematologic abnormalities of grade 3 or higher in either group were thrombocytopenia and anemia, which were managed with a dose reduction, interruption of treatment, or transfusion. One patient in each group discontinued treatment owing to thrombocytopenia, and none discontinued owing to anemia. Nonhematologic adverse events were rare and mostly grade 1 or 2. Two cases of acute myeloid leukemia were reported with the best available therapy. Continuous ruxolitinib therapy, as compared with the best available therapy, was associated with marked and durable reductions in splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms, improvements in role functioning and quality of life, and modest toxic effects. An influence on overall survival has not yet been shown. (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00934544.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Serious adverse events during ruxolitinib treatment discontinuation in patients with myelofibrosis.

              Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) is a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor recently evaluated for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) in early- and advanced-phase clinical trials. In 2 recent communications that focused on short-term and long-term ruxolitinib treatment outcome, respectively, the drug was shown to be effective in controlling constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly but was also associated with important adverse effects, including moderate to severe thrombocytopenia and anemia. The most recent of the 2 communications focused on 51 Mayo Clinic patients who participated in the original phase 1/2 ruxolitinib clinical trial and highlighted a high treatment discontinuation rate (92% after a median time of 9.2 months), primarily for loss of treatment benefit but also because of drug-associated adverse effects. The report also discussed the occurrence of sometimes severe withdrawal symptoms during ruxolitinib treatment discontinuation. This "ruxolitinib withdrawal syndrome" was characterized by acute relapse of disease symptoms, accelerated splenomegaly, worsening of cytopenias, and occasional hemodynamic decompensation, including a septic shocklike syndrome. In the current sponsor-independent analysis, we describe the details of these events in 5 severely affected cases (11%) among 47 Mayo Clinic patients with MF in whom ruxolitinib therapy had been discontinued. Our experience calls for full disclosure of the ruxolitinib withdrawal syndrome to patients with MF before initiating ruxolitinib therapy, and treatment discontinuation must be done under close physician supervision and preferably in a tapering schedule.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                francesca.palandri@unibo.it
                Journal
                Blood Cancer J
                Blood Cancer J
                Blood Cancer Journal
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2044-5385
                7 January 2021
                7 January 2021
                January 2021
                : 11
                : 1
                : 4
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.412311.4, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, IRCCS Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, , Dipartimento di Oncologia e di Ematologia, ; Bologna, Italia
                [2 ]GRID grid.8158.4, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 1969, Department of Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Tecnologie Avanzate “G.F. Ingrassia”, , University of Catania, ; Catania, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.415025.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1756 8604, Hematology Division, , San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza, ; Monza, Italy
                [4 ]GRID grid.7637.5, ISNI 0000000417571846, Unit of Blood Diseases and Stem Cells Transplantation, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, , University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, ; Brescia, Italy
                [5 ]Division of Hematology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Torino, Italy
                [6 ]GRID grid.414504.0, ISNI 0000 0000 9051 0784, Division of Hematology, , Azienda Ospedaliera ‘Bianchi Melacrino Morelli’, ; Reggio Calabria, Italy
                [7 ]GRID grid.416628.f, ISNI 0000 0004 1760 4441, Division of Hematology, , Ospedale S. Eugenio, ; Roma, Italy
                [8 ]GRID grid.5390.f, ISNI 0000 0001 2113 062X, Division of Hematology and BMT, Department of Medical Area, , University of Udine, ; Udine, Italy
                [9 ]Department of Hematology, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
                [10 ]GRID grid.7841.a, Division of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, , University Sapienza, ; Roma, Italy
                [11 ]GRID grid.8484.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 2064, Division of Hematology, , University of Ferrara, ; Ferrara, Italy
                [12 ]GRID grid.410345.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1756 7871, Clinic of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine (DiMI), , IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, ; Genova, Italy
                [13 ]GRID grid.5608.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 3470, Unit of Hematology and Clinical Immunology, , University of Padova, ; Padova, Italy
                [14 ]GRID grid.411482.a, Haematology and BMT Centre, , Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, ; Parma, Italy
                [15 ]Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Center, AORMN Hospital, Pesaro, Italy
                [16 ]GRID grid.7763.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1755 3242, Hematology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, , University of Cagliari, ; Cagliari, Italy
                [17 ]GRID grid.9613.d, ISNI 0000 0001 1939 2794, Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Oncology, , Friedrich-Schiller-University Medical Center, ; Jena, Germany
                [18 ]GRID grid.4691.a, ISNI 0000 0001 0790 385X, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Hematology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Center, , University of Naples Federico II, ; Napoli, Italy
                [19 ]GRID grid.476050.0, Division of Hematology, , AUSL di Piacenza, ; Piacenza, Italy
                [20 ]GRID grid.414818.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 8749, Hematology Division, , Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, ; Milano, Italy
                [21 ]GRID grid.5611.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1763 1124, Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology, , University of Verona, ; Verona, Italy
                [22 ]GRID grid.8158.4, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 1969, Division of Hematology, AOU Policlinico V. Emanuele, , University of Catania, ; Catania, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8367-5668
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1859-6319
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6297-9697
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-6491
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9449-2621
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6585-5187
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2438-1955
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2714-5109
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2036-2896
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0565-150X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7280-2040
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6061-4595
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4401-0812
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1163-6162
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-1686
                Article
                392
                10.1038/s41408-020-00392-1
                7791065
                33414394
                0c17a51d-e9aa-4da1-af60-314a8b13a442
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 25 September 2020
                : 2 November 2020
                : 10 November 2020
                Categories
                Correspondence
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                myeloproliferative disease,haematological diseases
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                myeloproliferative disease, haematological diseases

                Comments

                Comment on this article