11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Habitat use, preference, and utilization distribution of two crane species (Genus: Grus) in Huize National Nature Reserve, Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Understanding the habitat use and spatial distribution of wildlife can help conservationists determine high-priority areas and enhance conservation efforts. We studied the wintering habitat use, preference, and utilization distribution of two crane species, that is, the black-necked crane ( Grus nigricollis, Przevalski, 1876) and common crane ( Grus grus, Linnaeus, 1758), in Huize National Natural Reserve, Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau, southwestern China. Line transects indicated that anthropogenic farmland habitat was highly utilized and was positively selected by both crane species (>90% of flocks observed for both species). Black-necked cranes preferred marshland in spring (February and March) but avoided grassland during the entire wintering period, whereas common cranes avoided both marshland and grassland throughout the entire period. The two cranes species had communal nightly roosting sites and separate daily foraging sites. Black-necked cranes were distributed within two km (1.89 ± 0.08 km) of the roosting site, covering an area of 283.84 ha, with the core distribution area encompassing less than 100 ha. In contrast, common cranes were distributed far from the roosting site (4.38 ± 0.11 km), covering an area of 558.73 ha, with the core distribution area encompassing 224.81 ha. Thus, interspecies competition may have influenced the habitat preference and spatial distribution divergence of these two phylogenetically related species. This study should help guide habitat management as well as functional zoning development and adjustment in the future. Based on our results, we recommend restoration of additional wetlands, retention of large areas of farmland, and protection of areas that cranes use most frequently.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Quantitative measurement of food selection

          The forage ratio and Ivlev's electivity index are common measures to quantify food selection but the values of both indices depend not only on the extent of selection but also on the relative abundances of the food types in the environment. They are therefore useless when food types with different relative abundances are compared, or when the relation between selection and relative abundance is studied. Modified versions of both indices are proposed which are based directly on the rates of decrement (mortality) of the food due to feeding, and are independent of the relative abundance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Ecological Consequences of Shared Natural Enemies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Habitat preference modelling as a conservation tool: proposals for marine protected areas for cetaceans in southern Spanish waters

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ
                PeerJ Inc. (San Francisco, USA )
                2167-8359
                18 July 2018
                2018
                : 6
                : e5105
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Kunming, Yunnan, China
                [2 ]Key Laboratory of Special Biological Resource Development and Utilization of Universities in Yunnan Province, Kunming University , Kunming, Yunnan, China
                [3 ]College of Wetland, Southwest Forestry University , Kunming, Yunnan, China
                [4 ]Yunnan Institute of Environmental Science , Kunming, Yunnan, China
                [5 ]Administrative Bureau, National Nature Reserve of Black-Necked Cranes in Huize , Huize, Yunnan, China
                Article
                5105
                10.7717/peerj.5105
                6054782
                30042879
                0cb14d43-23d4-4b5e-acc3-407a4a3df9a4
                © 2018 Kong et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

                History
                : 1 November 2017
                : 5 June 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China
                Award ID: 31201725
                Funded by: Applicable Basic Research Project of Yunnan Province
                Award ID: 2012FB186
                This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31201725) and the Applicable Basic Research Project of Yunnan Province (2012FB186). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Conservation Biology
                Ecology
                Zoology
                Science Policy
                Natural Resource Management

                spatial distribution,habitat use,grus grus,habitat management,coexistence,grus nigricollis

                Comments

                Comment on this article