45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analysis of Resin-Dentin Interface Morphology and Bond Strength Evaluation of Core Materials for One Stage Post-Endodontic Restorations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Restoration of endodontically treated teeth using fiber posts in a one-stage procedure gains more popularity and aims to create a secondary monoblock. Data of detailed analyses of so called “post-and-core-systems” with respect to morphological characteristics of the resin-dentin interface in combination with bond strength measurements of fiber posts luted with these materials are scarce. The present study aimed to analyze four different post-and-core-systems with two different adhesive approaches (self-etch and etch-and-rinse).

          Materials and Methods

          Human anterior teeth (n = 80) were endodontically treated and post space preparations and post placement were performed using the following systems: Rebilda Post/Rebilda DC/Futurabond DC (Voco) (RB), Luxapost/Luxacore Z/Luxabond Prebond and Luxabond A+B (DMG) (LC), X Post/Core X Flow/XP Bond and Self Cure Activator (Dentsply DeTrey) (CX), FRC Postec/MultiCore Flow/AdheSE DC (Ivoclar Vivadent) (MC). Adhesive systems and core materials of 10 specimens per group were labeled using fluorescent dyes and resin-dentin interfaces were analyzed using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM). Bond strengths were evaluated using a push-out test. Data were analyzed using repeated measurement ANOVA and following post-hoc test.

          Results

          CLSM analyses revealed significant differences between groups with respect to the factors hybrid layer thickness (p<0.0005) and number of resin tags (p = 0.02; ANOVA). Bond strength was significantly affected by core material (p = 0.001), location inside the root canal (p<0.0005) and incorporation of fluorescent dyes (p = 0.036; ANOVA). CX [7.7 (4.4) MPa] demonstrated significantly lower bond strength compared to LC [14.2 (8.7) MPa] and RB [13.3 (3.7) MPa] (p<0.05; Tukey HSD) but did not differ significantly from MC [11.5 (3.5) MPa].

          Conclusion

          It can be concluded that bond strengths inside the root canal were not affected by the adhesive approach of the post-and-core-system. All systems demonstrated homogenous hybrid layer formation and penetration into the dentinal tubules in spite of the complicating conditions for adhesion inside the root canal.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives.

          Dental adhesives are designed to bond composite resins to enamel and dentin. Their chemical formulation determines to a large extent their adhesive performance in clinic. Irrespective of the number of bottles, an adhesive system typically contains resin monomers, curing initiators, inhibitors or stabilizers, solvents and sometimes inorganic filler. Each one of these components has a specific function. The aim of this article is to systematically review the ingredients commonly used in current dental adhesives as well as the properties of these ingredients. This paper includes an extensive table with the chemical formulation of contemporary dental adhesives.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            State of the art of self-etch adhesives.

            This paper reflects on the state of the art of self-etch adhesives anno 2010. After presenting the general characteristics of self-etch adhesives, the major shortcomings of the most simple-to-use one-step (self-etch) adhesives are addressed. Special attention is devoted to the AD-concept and the benefit of chemical interfacial interaction with regard to bond durability. Finally, issues like the potential interference of surface smear and the more challenging bond to enamel for 'mild' self-etch adhesives are discussed. Copyright © 2010 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal.

              The term monoblock has become familiar in the endodontic literature with recent interest in the application of dentin adhesive technology to endodontics. Endodontic monoblocks have generated controversial discussions among academicians and clinicians as to whether they are able to improve the quality of seal in root fillings and to strengthen roots. This review attempts to provide a broader meaning to the term monoblock and to see how this definition may be applied to the materials that have been used in the past and present for rehabilitation of the root canal space. The potential of currently available bondable materials to achieve mechanically homogeneous units with root dentin is then discussed in relation to the classical concept in which the term monoblock was first employed in restorative dentistry and subsequently in endodontics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                28 February 2014
                : 9
                : 2
                : e86294
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department for Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University School of Dental Medicine, CharitéCentrum 3, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Medical Informatics Biometry and Epidemiology, CharitéCentrum 4, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
                University Hospital of the Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Germany
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: For the present study the authors received the following donations: VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany provided 20 Fiber posts and the corresponding luting and adhesive system. Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany supplied 20 Fiber posts and the corresponding luting and adhesive system. Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein gave 20 Fiber posts and the corresponding luting and adhesive system. Finally, DMG, Hamburg, Germany provided 20 Fiber posts and the corresponding luting and adhesive system. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: KB UB RF. Performed the experiments: KB CG. Analyzed the data: KB KN. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KB CG UB. Wrote the paper: KB UB KN RF.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-42663
                10.1371/journal.pone.0086294
                3938409
                24586248
                0ccb8b39-43e5-4f33-9a25-e086b706ed2b
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 18 October 2013
                : 13 December 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                This study was supported by VOCO, Dentsply DeTrey, Ivoclar Vivadent, and DMG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Biotechnology
                Bioengineering
                Medical devices
                Biomaterials
                Engineering
                Bioengineering
                Medical devices
                Materials science
                Biomaterials
                Material properties
                Friction
                Medicine
                Oral medicine
                Dentistry

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article