18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Conspiracy beliefs, COVID-19 vaccine uptake and adherence to public health interventions during the pandemic in Europe

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Conspiracy beliefs can be a major hindrance causing a lack of compliance with public health measures, including vaccination. We examined the relationship between individual attitudes, socio-demographic factors, conspiracy beliefs, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and preferences about pandemic policies in Europe.

          Methods

          We used data from the 10th round of the European Social Survey, conducted in 2021–22 in 17 European countries. Both a conspiracy index and a personal attitude index for each participant were built by using a Latent Class Analysis model. Then, we used a multilevel regression model to investigate the relationship between a personal attitudes index, socio-demographic factors and country of residence, and a conspiracy index. We descriptively analyse the relationship between the conspiracy index and four main items related to COVID-19.

          Results

          We found that a higher probability of believing in conspiracy theories was associated with male gender, middle age, lower levels of education, unemployment, lower levels of trust and satisfaction and right-wing political orientation. The country of residence was a contextual factor, with eastern European countries having higher levels of conspiracy beliefs. Individuals who expressed conspiracy beliefs had lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake, were less satisfied with the way health services coped with the pandemic and less supportive of governmental restrictions.

          Conclusions

          This study provides valuable insights into the factors associated with conspiracy beliefs and their potential impact on public health. The findings highlight the need for effective strategies to address the underlying factors driving conspiracy beliefs, reduce vaccine hesitancy and promote acceptance of public health interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.

          Rationale The COVID-19 pandemic poses extraordinary challenges to public health. Objective Because the novel coronavirus is highly contagious, the widespread use of preventive measures such as masking, physical distancing, and eventually vaccination is needed to bring it under control. We hypothesized that accepting conspiracy theories that were circulating in mainstream and social media early in the COVID-19 pandemic in the US would be negatively related to the uptake of preventive behaviors and also of vaccination when a vaccine becomes available. Method A national probability survey of US adults (N = 1050) was conducted in the latter half of March 2020 and a follow-up with 840 of the same individuals in July 2020. The surveys assessed adoption of preventive measures recommended by public health authorities, vaccination intentions, conspiracy beliefs, perceptions of threat, belief about the safety of vaccines, political ideology, and media exposure patterns. Results Belief in three COVID-19-related conspiracy theories was highly stable across the two periods and inversely related to the (a) perceived threat of the pandemic, (b) taking of preventive actions, including wearing a face mask, (c) perceived safety of vaccination, and (d) intention to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Conspiracy beliefs in March predicted subsequent mask-wearing and vaccination intentions in July even after controlling for action taken and intentions in March. Although adopting preventive behaviors was predicted by political ideology and conservative media reliance, vaccination intentions were less related to political ideology. Mainstream television news use predicted adopting both preventive actions and vaccination. Conclusions Because belief in COVID-related conspiracy theories predicts resistance to both preventive behaviors and future vaccination for the virus, it will be critical to confront both conspiracy theories and vaccination misinformation to prevent further spread of the virus in the US. Reducing those barriers will require continued messaging by public health authorities on mainstream media and in particular on politically conservative outlets that have supported COVID-related conspiracy theories.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predictors of Intention to Vaccinate Against COVID-19: Results of a Nationwide Survey

            Highlights • Nationwide survey finds that nearly two in five adults reported hesitancy about getting a COVID-19 vaccine when one becomes available. • Significant demographic predictors of intent to vaccinate included being male, older, white, non-Hispanic, married, and higher socio-economic status. • Democrats were more likely to vaccinate than Republicans, and social media users had weaker vaccination intentions than nonusers. • Health predictors of intent to vaccinate included having multiple pre-existing conditions and being currently immunized against influenza. • COVID-19 vaccine promotion requires formative research into the concerns of hesitant people.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire

              Conspiracy theories are ubiquitous when it comes to explaining political events and societal phenomena. Individuals differ not only in the degree to which they believe in specific conspiracy theories, but also in their general susceptibility to explanations based on such theories, that is, their conspiracy mentality. We present the Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire (CMQ), an instrument designed to efficiently assess differences in the generic tendency to engage in conspiracist ideation within and across cultures. The CMQ is available in English, German, and Turkish. In four studies, we examined the CMQ’s factorial structure, reliability, measurement equivalence across cultures, and its convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity. Analyses based on a cross-cultural sample (Study 1a; N = 7,766) supported the conceptualization of conspiracy mentality as a one-dimensional construct across the three language versions of the CMQ that is stable across time (Study 1b; N = 141). Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the CMQ items. The instrument could therefore be used to examine differences in conspiracy mentality between European, North American, and Middle Eastern cultures. In Studies 2–4 (total N = 476), we report (re-)analyses of three datasets demonstrating the validity of the CMQ in student and working population samples in the UK and Germany. First, attesting to its convergent validity, the CMQ was highly correlated with another measure of generic conspiracy belief. Second, the CMQ showed patterns of meaningful associations with personality measures (e.g., Big Five dimensions, schizotypy), other generalized political attitudes (e.g., social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism), and further individual differences (e.g., paranormal belief, lack of socio-political control). Finally, the CMQ predicted beliefs in specific conspiracy theories over and above other individual difference measures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Eur J Public Health
                Eur J Public Health
                eurpub
                The European Journal of Public Health
                Oxford University Press
                1101-1262
                1464-360X
                August 2023
                08 June 2023
                08 June 2023
                : 33
                : 4
                : 717-724
                Affiliations
                Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Largo Francesco Vito 1, Rome 00168, Italy
                Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Largo Francesco Vito 1, Rome 00168, Italy
                Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Largo Francesco Vito 1, Rome 00168, Italy
                National Institute for the Analysis of Public Policies (INAPP) , Rome, Italy
                National Institute for the Analysis of Public Policies (INAPP) , Rome, Italy
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Chiara Cadeddu, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy, e-mail: chiara.cadeddu@ 123456unicatt.it
                [*]

                These authors share first authorship.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0189-7687
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0149-1078
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4436-8216
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5453-2294
                Article
                ckad089
                10.1093/eurpub/ckad089
                10393495
                37290405
                0d55e9fb-fae3-4d88-9557-4b5f5e3e7eba
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Categories
                Covid-19
                Editor's Choice
                AcademicSubjects/MED00860
                AcademicSubjects/SOC01210
                AcademicSubjects/SOC02610

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article