27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neuraxial Dexmedetomidine: Wonder Drug or Simply Harmful

      editorial
      1 , * , 2
      Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
      Kowsar
      Dexmedetomidine, Anesthesia, Analgesia

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In current anesthesia practice, neuraxial anesthesia is a major method among all anesthesia modalities. The most frequently performed neuraxial blocks are consecutively subarachnoid, epidural, and caudal blocks. Major indications are intraoperative anesthesia and analgesia, postoperative analgesia, analgesia for vaginal delivery, and management of chronic pain. For these purpose, local anesthetics (LA) are widely used alone or in combination with adjuvants. Adjuvants are mixed with LA to shorten the onset of action, increase the quality of block, increase the duration of anesthesia and analgesia, and to decrease the dose of LA. Benzodiazepines (e.g. midazolam), opioids (e.g. morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil), α-adrenergic agonists (e.g. epinephrine or phenylephrine), ketamine, and ∝2-adrenergic receptor agonists (e.g. clonidine or dexmedetomidine [DEX]) are adjuvants of common use. Mechanisms of action are also different. Out of these, ∝2-adrenergic receptor agonists are relatively newer and their uses are increasing. DEX, a dextrorotatory S-enantiomer of medetomidine, is an ∝2-adrenergic receptor agonist with the chemical structure being (S)-4-[1-(2, 3-dimethylphenyl) ethyl]-3H-Imidazole (Figure 1). Figure 1. Chemical Structure of Dexmedetomidine Like clonidine, DEX also acts on both α1 and α2 receptors. The α1 to α2 receptors binding ratio of 1:1620 makes it a highly selective α2 agonist in comparison to clonidine. Hence, the advantage of DEX over clonidine is decreased incidence of adverse effects due to involvement of α1 receptors (1). In 1999, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved DEX use for short-term sedation and analgesia (< 24 hours) in the intensive care units (ICU). In perioperative period, intravenous infusion of DEX acts as an anxiolytic and analgesic that blunts sympathetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation (2-4), decreases sympathetic response and emergent reaction on extubation with no delay in recovery or prolonged sedation (5, 6), and decreases the need for anesthetic agents (intravenous and inhalational), cardiovascular stabilization, neuroprotection, renoprotection, and no or minimal respiratory depression, reduced postoperative shivering (7). In critically ill patients, DEX is a useful sedative agent with analgesic properties, hemodynamic stability, and ability to recover respiratory function in mechanically ventilated patients facilitating early weaning. Other claimed advantages are reduced ICU stay, decreased duration of ventilation, and reduced agitation (8, 9). Although FDA has not approved DEX as an adjuvant in neuraxial blocks, it is widely used and is still in use in anesthesia practice as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia for both epidural and intrathecal modalities. Most of these trials, which had used DEX in intrathecal and epidural block, were conducted with or without prior approval of Institutional Ethics Committees. FDA and Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) do not approve "off-label use" of DEX as intrathecal or epidural adjuvant. Although outcome of most of these studies is favorable for its use as an adjuvant for neuraxial anesthesia, approval by FDA and DCGI is desirable for its uncontroversial use in anesthesia practice. Adding an adjuvant to the LA in subarachnoid or epidural space needs complete information regarding its specific gravity, pH, and compatibility as well as stability of the LA and adjuvant mixture; at present, no study has done or at least reported such information. In neuraxial anesthesia, DEX mediates its analgesic effects via spinal α2 receptors by depressing the release of C-fiber neurotransmitters and by hyperpolarization of postsynaptic dorsal horn neurons (10). Binding of α2 adrenoceptor agonists to motor neurons in the dorsal horn explains the motor effect of DEX. When used as an adjuvant to LA for neuraxial block, DEX leads to (10-14): Reduced onset time of sensory and motor block, increased duration of sensory block, delayed motor regression, prolonged postoperative analgesia and reduced total dose of analgesic, Delayed need of first rescue analgesic, Decreased postoperative shivering. Effects are usually dose dependent. Until now, there is no specific recommended dose of DEX for this purpose. Dose can be varied from 3 to 15 µg as an adjuvant to LA in spinal anesthesia. Solanki et al. stated that in comparison to clonidine (50 µg), equipotent dose of intrathecal DEX (5 µg) significantly prolonged postoperative analgesia (10). When compared to other adjuvants (fentanyl, magnesium sulfate, or buprenorphine), DEX showed prolonged postoperative analgesia with delayed and decreased need of rescue analgesics (11-13). For caudal epidural block, 1 to 2 µg/kg of DEX along with bupivacaine led to prolonged analgesia without significant side effects (14, 15). Moreover, use of epidural DEX significantly decreases the anesthetic requirements, prevents awareness during anesthesia, and improves intraoperative oxygenation and postoperative analgesia (16, 17). DEX along with LA for epidural analgesia during labor pains shows good maternal satisfaction without deleterious effect on uteroplacental circulation and newborns outcome (18). In a review and meta-analysis of perineural DEX, Abdallah et al. (19) showed an association between intrathecal or epidural DEX, as adjuvant to LA, and onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade; moreover, the time to first analgesic request was prolonged. They also mentioned that these results might be due to publication bias because of the source studies may or may not reflect less stringent Institutional Review Board and/or editorial board policies. DEX has also been used as an adjuvant in peripheral nerve blocks and has shown to prolong the sensory and motor block duration (20). The most common reported adverse effects are bradycardia and hypotension. Bradycardia due to DEX is resistant to atropine and higher doses are needed; although rare, even cardiac arrest might occur. Reported fatal complications of DEX were mainly related to its intravenous use as infusion in the elderly and in patients with cardiac disease (21, 22). Hypotension is due to decrease in central sympathetic outflow. When a large dose of DEX is used, it is preceded by hypertensive episode due to stimulation of α-2B receptors. Klinger et al. (23) in a retrospective analysis of 15656 patients concluded that there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of intraoperative hypotension (5.3% in DEX group, 6% in control group) or bradycardia (0.4% in both groups); however phenylephrine or atropine were more required in DEX group (23% vs. 15%; P < 0.0001). DEX should not be used as a sole anesthetic for neuraxial anesthesia. Konakci et al. (24), in their study on rabbits, observed that when epidural DEX was administered without LA, it would induce neurotoxicity (evidence of demyelination of the oligodendrocytes in the white matter in DEX group) in doses as high as 6.1 µg/kg. None of the human randomized studies have used DEX doses > 0.2 µg/kg for spinal adjuvant and > 1 µg/kg for epidural adjuvant. In addition, intrathecal DEX has shown a neuroprotective effect similar to methylprednisolone (25, 26), and no long-term and irreversible harmful effect of neuraxial DEX has been reported yet. In conclusion, DEX is a good LA adjuvant that can hasten the onset and prolong the duration of sensory and motor blockade when used in intrathecal or epidural block and appears to be safe; however, there are insufficient safety data to support the use of neuraxial DEX in the clinical setting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans.

          This study determined the responses to increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans. Ten healthy men (20-27 yr) provided informed consent and were monitored (underwent electrocardiography, measured arterial, central venous [CVP] and pulmonary artery [PAP] pressures, cardiac output, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide [ETCO2], respiration, blood gas, and catecholamines). Hemodynamic measurements, blood sampling, and psychometric, cold pressor, and baroreflex tests were performed at rest and during sequential 40-min intravenous target infusions of dexmedetomidine (0.5, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, 3.2, 5.0, and 8.0 ng/ml; baroreflex testing only at 0.5 and 0.8 ng/ml). The initial dose of dexmedetomidine decreased catecholamines 45-76% and eliminated the norepinephrine increase that was seen during the cold pressor test. Catecholamine suppression persisted in subsequent infusions. The first two doses of dexmedetomidine increased sedation 38 and 65%, and lowered mean arterial pressure by 13%, but did not change central venous pressure or pulmonary artery pressure. Subsequent higher doses increased sedation, all pressures, and calculated vascular resistance, and resulted in significant decreases in heart rate, cardiac output, and stroke volume. Recall and recognition decreased at a dose of more than 0.7 ng/ml. The pain rating and mean arterial pressure increase to cold pressor test progressively diminished as the dexmedetomidine dose increased. The baroreflex heart rate slowing as a result of phenylephrine challenge was potentiated at both doses of dexmedetomidine. Respiratory variables were minimally changed during infusions, whereas acid-base was unchanged. Increasing concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans resulted in progressive increases in sedation and analgesia, decreases in heart rate, cardiac output, and memory. A biphasic (low, then high) dose-response relation for mean arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, and vascular resistances, and an attenuation of the cold pressor response also were observed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine in humans. II. Hemodynamic changes.

            Dexmedetomidine (DMED) is a novel clonidine-like compound known to have sedative, analgesic, and cardiovascular stabilizing qualities. DMED is a more highly selective alpha 2-adrenergic agonist than clonidine. This investigation examined the hemodynamic effects of four selected iv doses in consenting healthy male volunteers. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial subjects received 0 (n = 9), 0.25 (n = 6) 0.5 (n = 6), 1.0 (n = 6), or 2.0 (n = 10) micrograms/kg of DMED by infusion (2 min). ECG, heart rate (HR), arterial blood pressure (MABP), bioimpedance cardiac output (CO), and plasma catecholamines concentrations (CA) were monitored from 90 min before to 360 min after infusion. Plasma DMED concentrations were measured. DMED produced a maximum decrease in MABP at 60 min of 14%, 16%, 23%, and 27% for the 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 micrograms/kg groups, respectively (P < .05). At 330 min MABP remained below baseline by 8% and 17% at the two largest doses (P < .05). Both HR and CO decreased maximally by both 17% at 105 min. The two largest doses produced a transient (peak at 3 min lasting < 11 min) increased in MABP (16 +/- 2.5 and 24 +/- 10 mmHg, respectively; P < .05) with a concomitantly reduced CO (41%, 2 micrograms/kg; P < .05) and HR (22%, 2 micrograms/kg; P < .05), whereas systemic vascular resistance doubled. Even the lowest dose decreased CA immediately to values close to 20 pg/ml for 5 h. A 2-min iv infusion of DMED produced a transient increase in MABP and a longer lasting decrease in MABP and CA. These DMED doses were well tolerated in the healthy volunteers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Facilitatory effects of perineural dexmedetomidine on neuraxial and peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Nerve blocks improve postoperative analgesia, but their benefits may be short-lived. This quantitative review examines whether perineural dexmedetomidine as a local anaesthetic (LA) adjuvant for neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks can prolong the duration of analgesia compared with LA alone. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of dexmedetomidine as an LA adjuvant to LA alone on neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks were reviewed. Sensory block duration, motor block duration, block onset times, analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic request, and side-effects were analysed. were combined using random-effects modelling. A total of 516 patients were analysed from nine RCTs. Five trials investigated dexmedetomidine as part of spinal anaesthesia and four as part of a brachial plexus (BP) block. Sensory block duration was prolonged by 150 min [95% confidence interval (CI): 96, 205, P<0.00001] with intrathecal dexmedetomidine. Perineural dexmedetomidine used in BP block may prolong the mean duration of sensory block by 284 min (95% CI: 1, 566, P=0.05), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Motor block duration and time to first analgesic request were prolonged for both intrathecal and BP block. Dexmedetomidine produced reversible bradycardia in 7% of BP block patients, but no effect on the incidence of hypotension. No patients experienced respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine is a potential LA adjuvant that can exhibit a facilitatory effect when administered intrathecally as part of spinal anaesthesia or peripherally as part of a BP block. However, there are presently insufficient safety data to support perineural dexmedetomidine use in the clinical setting.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Anesth Pain Med
                Anesth Pain Med
                10.5812/aapm
                Kowsar
                Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
                Kowsar
                2228-7523
                2228-7531
                30 March 2015
                April 2015
                : 5
                : 2
                : e22651
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
                [2 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, India
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Sohan Lal Solanki, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Tel: +91-2224177053, Fax: +91-2224146937, E-mail: me_sohans@ 123456yahoo.co.in
                Article
                10.5812/aapm.22651
                4389101
                0e1110e6-c245-4955-8a64-2df4c8588a44
                Copyright © 2015, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM).

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 August 2014
                : 31 August 2014
                : 21 September 2014
                Categories
                Editorial

                dexmedetomidine,anesthesia,analgesia
                dexmedetomidine, anesthesia, analgesia

                Comments

                Comment on this article