39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative Analysis Highlights Variable Genome Content of Wheat Rusts and Divergence of the Mating Loci

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Three members of the Puccinia genus, Puccinia triticina ( Pt), P. striiformis f.sp. tritici ( Pst), and P. graminis f.sp. tritici ( Pgt), cause the most common and often most significant foliar diseases of wheat. While similar in biology and life cycle, each species is uniquely adapted and specialized. The genomes of Pt and Pst were sequenced and compared to that of Pgt to identify common and distinguishing gene content, to determine gene variation among wheat rust pathogens, other rust fungi, and basidiomycetes, and to identify genes of significance for infection. Pt had the largest genome of the three, estimated at 135 Mb with expansion due to mobile elements and repeats encompassing 50.9% of contig bases; in comparison, repeats occupy 31.5% for Pst and 36.5% for Pgt. We find all three genomes are highly heterozygous, with Pst [5.97 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)/kb] nearly twice the level detected in Pt (2.57 SNPs/kb) and that previously reported for Pgt. Of 1358 predicted effectors in Pt, 784 were found expressed across diverse life cycle stages including the sexual stage. Comparison to related fungi highlighted the expansion of gene families involved in transcriptional regulation and nucleotide binding, protein modification, and carbohydrate degradation enzymes. Two allelic homeodomain pairs, HD1 and HD2, were identified in each dikaryotic Puccinia species along with three pheromone receptor ( STE3) mating-type genes, two of which are likely representing allelic specificities. The HD proteins were active in a heterologous Ustilago maydis mating assay and host-induced gene silencing (HIGS) of the HD and STE3 alleles reduced wheat host infection.

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods

          Strand-specific, massively-parallel cDNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is a powerful tool for novel transcript discovery, genome annotation, and expression profiling. Despite multiple published methods for strand-specific RNA-Seq, no consensus exists as to how to choose between them. Here, we developed a comprehensive computational pipeline to compare library quality metrics from any RNA-Seq method. Using the well-annotated Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptome as a benchmark, we compared seven library construction protocols, including both published and our own novel methods. We found marked differences in strand-specificity, library complexity, evenness and continuity of coverage, agreement with known annotations, and accuracy for expression profiling. Weighing each method’s performance and ease, we identify the dUTP second strand marking and the Illumina RNA ligation methods as the leading protocols, with the former benefitting from the current availability of paired-end sequencing. Our analysis provides a comprehensive benchmark, and our computational pipeline is applicable for assessment of future protocols in other organisms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            DAGchainer: a tool for mining segmental genome duplications and synteny.

            Given the positions of protein-coding genes along genomic sequence and probability values for protein alignments between genes, DAGchainer identifies chains of gene pairs sharing conserved order between genomic regions, by identifying paths through a directed acyclic graph (DAG). These chains of collinear gene pairs can represent segmentally duplicated regions and genes within a single genome or syntenic regions between related genomes. Automated mining of the Arabidopsis genome for segmental duplications illustrates the use of DAGchainer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Wheat leaf rust caused by Puccinia triticina.

              Leaf rust, caused by Puccinia triticina, is the most common rust disease of wheat. The fungus is an obligate parasite capable of producing infectious urediniospores as long as infected leaf tissue remains alive. Urediniospores can be wind-disseminated and infect host plants hundreds of kilometres from their source plant, which can result in wheat leaf rust epidemics on a continental scale. This review summarizes current knowledge of the P. triticina/wheat interaction with emphasis on the infection process, molecular aspects of pathogenicity, rust resistance genes in wheat, genetics of the host parasite interaction, and the population biology of P. triticina. Puccinia triticina Eriks.: kingdom Fungi, phylum Basidiomycota, class Urediniomycetes, order Uredinales, family Pucciniaceae, genus Puccinia. Telial/uredinial (primary) hosts: common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), durum wheat (T. turgidum L. var. durum), cultivated emmer wheat (T. dicoccon) and wild emmer wheat (T. dicoccoides), Aegilops speltoides, goatgrass (Ae. cylindrica), and triticale (X Triticosecale). Pycnial/aecial (alternative) hosts: Thalictrum speciosissimum (= T. flavum glaucum) and Isopyrum fumaroides. Leaf rust is characterized by the uredinial stage. Uredinia are up to 1.5 mm in diameter, erumpent, round to ovoid, with orange to brown uredinia that are scattered on both the upper and the lower leaf surfaces of the primary host. Uredinia produce urediniospores that are sub-globoid, average 20 microm in diameter and are orange-brown, with up to eight germ pores scattered in thick, echinulate walls. Wheat varieties that are fully susceptible have large uredinia without causing chlorosis or necrosis in the host tissues. Resistant wheat varieties are characterized by various responses from small hypersensitive flecks to small to moderate size uredinia that may be surrounded by chlorotic and/or necrotic zones. USDA Cereal Disease Laboratory: http://www.ars.usda.gov/mwa/cdl.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                G3 (Bethesda)
                Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
                Genetics Society of America
                2160-1836
                1 December 2016
                February 2017
                : 7
                : 2
                : 361-376
                Affiliations
                [* ]Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
                []Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland Research and Development Centre, British Columbia V0H 1Z0, Canada
                []Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Morden Research and Development Centre, Manitoba R6M 1Y5, Canada
                [§ ]The Institute for Cereal Crops Improvement, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel
                [** ]Department of Plant Pathology, Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Manhattan, Kansas 66506
                [†† ]Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164
                [‡‡ ]Cereal Disease Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
                [§§ ]Wheat Health, Genetics, and Quality Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Pullman, Washington 99164
                Author notes
                [1 ]Corresponding authors: Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge MA 02142. E-mail: cuomo@ 123456broadinstitute.org ; 4200 Hwy 97 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland Research and Development Centre, Summerland, BC, V0H 1Z0, Canada. E-mail: Guus.Bakkeren@ 123456agr.gc.ca ; and Department of Plant Pathology, Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 4004 Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506. E-mail: john.fellers@ 123456ars.usda.gov
                [2]

                Present address: Plant Biotechnology Institute, National Research Council Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0WN, Canada.

                [3]

                Present address: Department of Biology, Université de Moncton, New Brunswick E1A 3E9, Canada.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5778-960X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-6989
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3872-2909
                Article
                GGG_032797
                10.1534/g3.116.032797
                5295586
                27913634
                0e186916-b293-4df0-9f5e-af99d64908d8
                Copyright © 2017 Cuomo et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 June 2016
                : 24 October 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 97, Pages: 16
                Categories
                Investigations

                Genetics
                puccinia,genome comparisons,effectors,mating-type genes,sexual stage
                Genetics
                puccinia, genome comparisons, effectors, mating-type genes, sexual stage

                Comments

                Comment on this article