19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found
      , , ,
      Meat Science
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In this study, a convenient, sensitive and specific real-time PCR assay was described for the species identification and their quantification in raw and cooked meat products. Specific primers and TaqMan probes were designed on the mitochondrial ND2, ND5 and ATP 6-8 genes for donkey, pork and horse, respectively, and the performance of the method was tested. In the results, no cross-reaction was observed between the donkey and pork species specific primer-probe systems and non-target species (bovine, ovine, chicken and turkey). Only one cross reaction was observed between the horse species specific primer-probe set and 100ng pork DNA at the ct 33.01 level (corresponding to 0.01ng horse DNA). The real-time quantitative assay used in this study allowed the detection of as little as 0.0001ng template DNA from pure meat for each species investigated and experimental meat mixtures. In conclusion, it can be suggested that the TaqMan probe assay used in this research might be a rapid and sensitive method for the routine meat species identifications studies in raw or cooked meat products.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Meat Science
          Meat Science
          Elsevier BV
          03091740
          August 2009
          August 2009
          : 82
          : 4
          : 444-449
          Article
          10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.02.019
          20416686
          0e2b7fd1-79b1-4ad2-a92f-9fd718d61cd9
          © 2009

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article