9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Delays in Achieving Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Targets for 2021 and 2030 in Liberia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: The Government of Liberia has set ambitious national health targets for 2021 to reduce the high maternal, newborn, and child mortality rate and to improve the related health services. Additionally, Sustainable Development Goal 3 provides a long-term target for 2030. The objective of this article is to analyze the gaps between the targets and collected data.

          Materials and Methods: Relevant national documents were scrutinized to identify targets and related indicators which can serve as benchmarks for future achievements in Liberia's maternal, newborn, and child health. For each indicator, progress observed will be compared with that needed to meet the target, based on the indicator value in a baseline year, a later observed value, and the expected value in 2021 and 2030, respectively.

          Results: The Gap Analysis reveals achievements and serious delays for 21 health and health system indicators. Based on national data the reduction of the maternal mortality ratio will take an additional −8.2 years for the 2021 target and −12.5 years for the 2030 target. The Neonatal Mortality rate is experiencing similar delays of −7.9 years for 2021 and −12.9 for 2030 whereas the targets for the Under-5-Mortality rate can be achieved with small delays of −1.8 and −1.7 years.

          Conclusions: The Government of Liberia requires persistent efforts and international support to achieve its national targets and the Sustainable Development Goal 3 for health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          United Nations Millennium Declaration

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Role of maternity waiting homes in the reduction of maternal death and stillbirth in developing countries and its contribution for maternal death reduction in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

            Background Every family expect to have a healthy mother and new born baby after pregnancy. Especially for parents, pregnancy is a time of great anticipation. Access to maternal and child health care insures safer pregnancy and its outcome. MWHs is one the strategy. The objective was to synthesize the best available evidence on effectiveness of maternity waiting homes on the reduction of maternal mortality and stillbirth in developing countries. Methods Before conducting this review non-occurrences of the same review is verified. To avoid introduction of bias because of errors, two independent reviewers appraised each article. Maternal death and stillbirth were the primary outcomes. Review Manager 5 were used to produce a random-effect meta-analysis. Grade Pro software were used to produce risk of bias summary and summary of findings. Result In developing countries, maternity waiting homes users were 80% less likely to die than non-users (OR = 0. 20, 95% CI [0.08, 0.49]) and there was 73% less occurrence of stillbirth among users (OR = 0.27, 95% CI [0.09, 0.82]). In Ethiopia, there was a 91% reduction of maternal death among maternity waiting homes users unlike non-users (OR = 0.09, 95% CI [0.04, 0.19]) and it contributes to the reduction of 83% stillbirth unlike non-users (OR = 0.17, 95% CI [0.05, 0.58]). Conclusion Maternity waiting home contributes more than 80% to the reduction of maternal death among users in developing countries and Ethiopia. Its contribution for reduction of stillbirth is good. More than 70% of stillbirth is reduced among the users of maternity waiting homes. In Ethiopia maternity waiting homes contributes to the reduction of more than two third of stillbirths. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3559-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Maternity waiting facilities for improving maternal and neonatal outcome in low-resource countries.

              A Maternity Waiting Home (MWH) is a facility, within easy reach of a hospital or health centre which provides Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC). Women may stay in the MWH at the end of their pregnancy and await labour. Once labour starts, women move to the health facility so that labour and giving birth may be assisted by a skilled birth attendant. The aim of the MWH is to improve accessibility and thus reduce morbidity and mortality for mother and neonate should complications arise. Some studies report a favourable effect on the outcomes for women and their newborn. Others show that utilisation is low and barriers exist. However these data are limited in reliability. To assess the effects of a maternity waiting facility on maternal and perinatal health. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (April 2009), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2009), EMBASE (1980 to April 2009), CINAHL (1982 to April 2009), African Journals Online (AJOL) (April 2009), POPLINE (April 2009), Dissertation Abstracts (April 2009) and the National Research Register archive (March 2008). Randomised controlled trials including quasi-randomised and cluster-randomised trials that compared perinatal and maternal outcome in women using a MWH and women who did not. There were no randomised controlled trials or cluster-randomised trials identified from the search. There were no randomised controlled trials or cluster-randomised trials identified from the search. There is insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of Maternity Waiting Facilities for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                13 December 2019
                2019
                : 7
                : 386
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Section of International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University , Bielefeld, Germany
                [2] 2EPOS Health Management , Bad Homburg, Germany
                [3] 3College of Business Administration, INHA University , Incheon, South Korea
                [4] 4Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health and Management, University of Belgrade , Belgrade, Serbia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jonathan Ling, University of Sunderland, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Ranjeet Kumar Sinha, Patna Medical College, India; Michelle L. Munro-Kramer, University of Michigan, United States

                *Correspondence: Ulrich Laaser ulrich.laaser@ 123456uni-bielefeld.de

                This article was submitted to Public Health Policy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2019.00386
                6923216
                31921750
                0e9f7b39-909f-4ba1-ab33-7db4ba47056f
                Copyright © 2019 Laaser, Broniatowski, Byepu and Bjegovic-Mikanovic.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 20 November 2018
                : 29 November 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 6, Equations: 3, References: 33, Pages: 8, Words: 6372
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research

                gap analysis,delays in progress,health targets,maternal health,newborn health,child health,liberia

                Comments

                Comment on this article