0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Critical success factors for sustainable construction: a literature review

      Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The purpose of this paper is to synthesize and evaluate the available literature with respect to critical success factors (CSFs) for sustainable construction (SC).

          Design/methodology/approach

          A systematic literature review (SLR) was undertaken to assist in the identification of the most pertinent papers from three publishers: Emerald, Elsevier and Wiley. The literature findings were assessed and presented relative to publication, author and contents as determined by review.

          Findings

          The SLR was conducted using a number of search criteria. A final set of 31 publications were detected for further examination. The characteristics in terms of publications, authors and contents of the extracted publication set were examined and discussed. A total of 35 factors were identified, distributed in five research categories. The frequency of the extracted factors within the publication set was investigated and enabled valuable quantitative and qualitative observations of current trends for SC. Interestingly, all research categories were represented in the top-counted factors, demonstrating a holistic perception of SC. Given the publication set, in most aspects, the research area examined seems to demonstrate features of an emerging field, which is not yet well established.

          Research limitations/implications

          SLR cannot ensure that all pertinent publications were identified, because it was tailored to a number of search criteria, although certain actions were taken to moderate this limitation. However, the outcome adequately identifies trends and offers valuable information and knowledge for SC and its successful implementation.

          Originality/value

          The present study presents a broad list of factors for SC, integrated from a variety of disciplines and stakeholders. The findings, therefore, provide a valuable reference for both construction professionals and practitioners attempting to implement SC. Furthermore, the list can be of use to academic scholars for further empirical work and basis for future research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references105

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions.

            Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing large bodies of evidence and helping to explain differences among studies on the same question. A systematic review involves the application of scientific strategies, in ways that limit bias, to the assembly, critical appraisal, and synthesis of all relevant studies that address a specific clinical question. A meta-analysis is a type of systematic review that uses statistical methods to combine and summarize the results of several primary studies. Because the review process itself (like any other type of research) is subject to bias, a useful review requires clear reporting of information obtained using rigorous methods. Used increasingly to inform medical decision making, plan future research agendas, and establish clinical policy, systematic reviews may strengthen the link between best research evidence and optimal health care.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal
                MEQ
                Emerald
                1477-7835
                January 14 2019
                January 14 2019
                : 30
                : 1
                : 176-196
                Article
                10.1108/MEQ-02-2018-0043
                0eb22a2f-fde3-4ba8-8e2a-e52857d94bcc
                © 2019

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article