10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Taking the ‘care’ out of care homes: The moral dilemma of institutional long‐term care provision during COVID‐19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Little is known on how the pandemic has changed care home care delivery. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of COVID‐19 on care provision and visits in care homes from staff and family members’ perspectives. For this purpose, we conducted a telephone‐ and zoom‐based qualitative semi‐structured interview study. Care home staff and family carers of people living with dementia (PLWD) across the UK were recruited via convenience sampling and participated via telephone or online. Participants took part in a semi‐structured remote interview. Data were collected between October and November 2020. Anonymised transcripts were analysed separately by two research team members using thematic analysis, with codes discussed and themes generated jointly, supported by research team input. 42 participants (26 family carers and 16 care home staff) took part. Five themes were generated: (a) Care home reputation and financial implications; (b) Lack of care; (c) Communication or lack thereof; (d) Visiting rights/changes based on residents’ needs; (e) Deterioration of residents. With a lack of clear guidance throughout the pandemic, care homes delivered care differently with disparities in the levels and types of visiting allowed for family members. Lack of communication between care homes and family members, but also government and care homes, led to family carers feeling excluded and concerned about the well‐being of their relative. Improved communication and clear guidance for care homes and the public are required to negate the potentially damaging effects of COVID‐19 restrictions upon residents, their families and the carers who support them.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal observational study

            Background There is major concern about the impact of the global COVID-19 outbreak on mental health. Several studies suggest that mental health deteriorated in many countries before and during enforced isolation (ie, lockdown), but it remains unknown how mental health has changed week by week over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to explore the trajectories of anxiety and depression over the 20 weeks after lockdown was announced in England, and compare the growth trajectories by individual characteristics. Methods In this prospective longitudinal observational study, we analysed data from the UCL COVID-19 Social Study, a panel study weighted to population proportions, which collects information on anxiety (using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder assessment) and depressive symptoms (using the Patient Health Questionnaire) weekly in the UK since March 21, 2020. We included data from adults living in England who had at least three repeated measures between March 23 and Aug 9, 2020. Analyses were done using latent growth models, which were fitted to account for sociodemographic and health covariates. Findings Between March 23, and Aug 9, data from over 70 000 adults were collected in the UCL COVID-19 Social Study. When including participants living in England with three follow-up measures and no missing values, our analytic sample consisted of 36 520 participants. The average depression score was 6·6 (SD=6·0, range 0–27) and the average anxiety score 5·7 (SD=5·6, range 0–21) in week 1. Anxiety and depression levels both declined across the first 20 weeks following the introduction of lockdown in England (b=–1·93, SE=0·26, p<0·0001 for anxiety; b=–2·52, SE=0·28, p<0·0001 for depressive symptoms). The fastest decreases were seen across the strict lockdown period (between weeks 2 and 5), with symptoms plateauing as further lockdown easing measures were introduced (between weeks 16 and 20). Being a woman or younger, having lower educational attainment, lower income, or pre-existing mental health conditions, and living alone or with children were all risk factors for higher levels of anxiety and depression at the start of lockdown. Many of these inequalities in experiences were reduced as lockdown continued, but differences were still evident 20 weeks after the start of lockdown. Interpretation These data suggest that the highest levels of depression and anxiety occurred in the early stages of lockdown but declined fairly rapidly, possibly because individuals adapted to circumstances. Our findings emphasise the importance of supporting individuals in the lead-up to future lockdowns to try to reduce distress, and highlight that groups already at risk for poor mental health before the pandemic have remained at risk throughout lockdown and its aftermath. Funding Nuffield Foundation, UK Research and Innovation, Wellcome Trust.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of COVID-19 related social support service closures on people with dementia and unpaid carers: a qualitative study

              Accessing social care and social support services is key to support the well-being of people living with dementia (PLWD) and unpaid carers. COVID-19 has caused sudden closures or radical modifications of these services, and is resulting in prolonged self-isolation. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of COVID-19 related social care and support service changes and closures on the lives of PLWD and unpaid carers.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Clarissa.giebel@liverpool.ac.uk
                Journal
                Health Soc Care Community
                Health Soc Care Community
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2524
                HSC
                Health & Social Care in the Community
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0966-0410
                1365-2524
                21 November 2021
                21 November 2021
                : 10.1111/hsc.13651
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Primary Care & Mental Health University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
                [ 2 ] NIHR ARC NWC Liverpool UK
                [ 3 ] Lewy Body Society Wigan UK
                [ 4 ] Sefton Advocacy Sefton UK
                [ 5 ] Palliative Care Unit University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
                [ 6 ] SURF Liverpool Liverpool UK
                [ 7 ] Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Trust Lancaster UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Clarissa Giebel, Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, 1‐5 Brownlow Street, Waterhouse Building, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK.

                Email: Clarissa.giebel@ 123456liverpool.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-0566
                Article
                HSC13651
                10.1111/hsc.13651
                9011824
                34806233
                100f9cfe-9fcc-448c-b33c-e62cef9df2fa
                © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 15 September 2021
                : 09 May 2021
                : 08 November 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 10, Words: 8744
                Funding
                Funded by: Geoffrey and Pauline Martin Trust
                Funded by: NIHR , doi 10.13039/501100000272;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.4 mode:remove_FC converted:15.04.2022

                Health & Social care
                care delivery,care homes,covid‐19,dementia,nursing,staff
                Health & Social care
                care delivery, care homes, covid‐19, dementia, nursing, staff

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content118

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors327