10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology

      Submit here before September 30, 2024

      About Digestion: 3.2 Impact Factor I 6.4 CiteScore I 0.914 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Advances in Laparoscopic Surgery

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          After a brief account of the origins of laparoscopy and of its development into an interventional technique thanks to technical improvement, the author gives a dynamic state of the art in laparoscopic surgery, beginning with a description of his original classification method for laparoscopic procedures according to their level of use. Before tackling the highly controversial issue of laparoscopic surgery for cancer, he reviews in detail the various operations successfully performed by laparoscopy for the treatment of nonmalignant abdominal disorders and acute syndromes, all the while checking their results against those obtained with their open counterparts. As the various procedures are described, the interest of the laparoscopic approach becomes clearly visible, based on the excellent view of the operative field that allows diagnostic accuracy, thus avoiding unnecessary operations, and precise dissection with minimal damage. However, the laparoscopic approach is highly dependent on the surgeon’s proficiency, itself depending on experience and therefore on the frequency of occurrence of the disorder, and on the progress in and availability of adequate equipments. The last chapter looks into the future of this ever-expanding approach and defines two great trends in its evolution, one accessible to the individual surgeon, the gradual adaptation of open procedures into laparoscopic ones, the other at the institutional level, in view of the huge financial support involved if high technologies are to be systematically integrated in this new surgery. What will the future be like?

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

          The authors examined indications, evaluations, and outcomes after laparoscopic fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux through this single-institution study. Laparoscopic fundoplication has been performed for less than 5 years, yet the early and intermediate results suggest that this operation is safe and equivalent in efficacy to open techniques of antireflux surgery. Over a 4-year period, 300 patients underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (252) or laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (48) for gastroesophageal reflux refractory to medical therapy or requiring daily therapy with omeprazole or high-dose H2 antagonists. Preoperative evaluation included symptom assessment, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 24-hour pH evaluation, and esophageal motility study. Physiologic follow-up included 24-hour pH study and esophageal motility study performed 6 weeks and 1 to 3 years after operation. The most frequent indication for surgery was the presence of residual typical and atypical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (64%) despite standard doses of proton pump inhibitors. At preoperative evaluation, 51% of patients had erosive esophagitis, stricture, or Barrett's metaplasia. Ninety-eight percent of patients had an abnormal 24-hour pH study. Seventeen percent had impaired esophageal motility and 2% had aperistalsis. There were four conversions to open fundoplication (adhesions, three; large liver, one). Intraoperative technical difficulties occurred in 19(6%) patients and were dealt with intraoperatively in all but 1 patient (bleeding from enlarged left liver lobe). Minor complications occurred in 6% and major complications in 2%. There was no mortality. Median follow-up was 17 months. One year after operation, heartburn was absent in 93%. Four percent took occasional H2 antagonists, and 3% were back on daily therapy. Atypical reflux symptoms (e.g., asthma, hoarseness, chest pain, or cough) were eliminated or improved in 87% and no better in 13%. Overall patient satisfaction was 97%. Four patients have subsequently undergone laparotomy for repair of gastric perforation (1 year after operation), severe dumping, "slipped" Nissen, and repair of acute paraesophageal herniation. Two patients had laparoscopic revision of herniated fundoplications. Results of follow-up 24-hour pH studies were normal in 91% of patients more than 1 year after operation. In patients with poor esophageal motility, esophageal body pressure improved 1 year after operation in 75% and worsened in 10%. Although long-term efficacy data are lacking, intermediate follow-up shows laparoscopic fundoplication to be safe and effective. A physiologic approach to evaluation and follow-up of patients with gastroesophageal disease allows the surgeon to tailor antireflux surgery to esophageal body function and follow the function of the fundoplication and esophagus after operation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Laparoscopic treatment of nonparasitic liver cysts: adequate selection of patients and surgical technique.

            Results of laparoscopic fenestration in patients with a highly symptomatic solitary liver cyst (17 patients) or polycystic liver disease (PLD) (9 patients) were prospectively evaluated in a multicenter practice of general surgeons. Conversion to laparotomy was required in two patients because of inaccessible deep liver cyst in one and a diffuse form of PLD in the other. There was no mortality or major morbidity. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.6 days after successful laparoscopic procedures. During a mean follow-up of 9 months, 23% of the patients had recurrence of symptoms and 38% had radiographic reappearance of cysts. Factors predicting failure included previous surgical treatment, deepsited cysts, incomplete deroofing technique, location in the right posterior segments of the liver, and a diffuse form of PLD with small cysts. Adequate selection of patients and type of cystic liver disease and meticulous and aggressive surgical technique are recommended.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Selection criteria for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory care setting.

              The ambulatory care center offers patient convenience and reduced costs after uneventful laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospectively accumulated database of 1,750 cholecystectomies performed by one surgeon in a hospital setting was analyzed to test criteria for ambulatory cholecystectomy. Proposed criteria included age less than 65, absence of upper abdominal operations, and elective operations in healthy patients at low risk for common bile duct stones. Of 1,750 cholecystectomies, only 605 patients met all criteria for outpatient care. Discharge (from the in-hospital setting) was accomplished within 24 h of operation in 92% (first 3 years) and 98% (last 4 years) of selected cases. Only one patient (0.2%, 1/605) was converted to an open procedure; another was readmitted 30 h postoperatively with hemorrhage from the liver bed. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in an ambulatory care setting, given careful selection and education of patients and documented experience of the surgical team.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                DIG
                Digestion
                10.1159/issn.0012-2823
                Digestion
                S. Karger AG
                0012-2823
                1421-9867
                1998
                August 1998
                17 August 1998
                : 59
                : 5
                : 606-618
                Affiliations
                Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire de Bordeaux, France
                Article
                7535 Digestion 1998;59:606–618
                10.1159/000007535
                9705542
                101cb137-1343-49d3-835d-c11e3afe75c6
                © 1998 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Categories
                Paper

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Gastroenterology & Hepatology,Surgery,Nutrition & Dietetics,Internal medicine
                History of surgery,Robotics,Television surgery,Interventional endoscopy,Laparoscopic surgery for cancer,Virtual reality,Training in laparoscopic surgery,Minimally invasive therapy,Laparoscopic surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article