0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Use and safety of unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation during maintenance hemodialysis.

      American Journal of Kidney Diseases
      Anticoagulants, adverse effects, therapeutic use, Blood Coagulation, drug effects, Diabetic Nephropathies, Disease Progression, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Follow-Up Studies, Hemorrhage, chemically induced, prevention & control, Heparin, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, etiology, therapy, Kidney Function Tests, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, methods, Patient Safety, Renal Dialysis, Risk Assessment, Severity of Illness Index, Thromboembolism, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Anticoagulation is essential to hemodialysis, and unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the most commonly used anticoagulant in the United States. However, there is no universally accepted standard for its administration in long-term hemodialysis. Dosage schedules vary and include weight-based protocols and low-dose protocols for those at high risk of bleeding, as well as regional anticoagulation with heparin and heparin-coated dialyzers. Adjustments are based largely on clinical signs of under- and overanticoagulation. Risks of UFH use include bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, anaphylaxis, and possibly bone mineral disease, hyperkalemia, and catheter-associated sepsis. Alternative anticoagulants include low-molecular-weight heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors, heparinoids, and citrate. Anticoagulant-free hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis also are potential substitutes. However, some of these alternative treatments are not as available as or are more costly than UFH, are dependent on country and health care system, and present dosing challenges. When properly monitored, UFH is a relatively safe and economical choice for anticoagulation in long-term hemodialysis for most patients. Copyright © 2012 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article