4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of GC4419 Versus Placebo to Reduce Severe Oral Mucositis Due to Concurrent Radiotherapy and Cisplatin For Head and Neck Cancer

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , MD 2 , , DMD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD 5 , , MD 6 , , MD 7 , , DDS, PhD 8 , , MD 9 , , MD 10 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MD 13 , , MD 14 , , MD 15 , 16 , , MD, PhD 17 , , MD, PhD 18 , , MD 18 , , MD 19 , , MD 20 , , MD 21 , , MD 22 , , BA 22 , , MPH 23 , , DMD, DMSc 24 , , MD 25 , , MD 1
      Journal of Clinical Oncology
      American Society of Clinical Oncology

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          Oral mucositis (OM) remains a common, debilitating toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. The goal of this phase IIb, multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of GC4419, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, with placebo to reduce the duration, incidence, and severity of severe OM (SOM).

          PATIENTS AND METHODS

          A total of 223 patients (from 44 institutions) with locally advanced oral cavity or oropharynx cancer planned to be treated with definitive or postoperative intensity-modulated RT (IMRT; 60 to 72 Gy [≥ 50 Gy to two or more oral sites]) plus cisplatin (weekly or every 3 weeks) were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg (n = 73) or 90 mg (n = 76) of GC4419 or to receive placebo (n = 74) by 60-minute intravenous administration before each IMRT fraction. WHO grade of OM was assessed biweekly during IMRT and then weekly for up to 8 weeks after IMRT. The primary endpoint was duration of SOM tested for each active dose level versus placebo (intent-to-treat population, two-sided α of .05). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, was used for adverse event grading.

          RESULTS

          Baseline patient and tumor characteristics as well as treatment delivery were balanced. With 90 mg GC4419 versus placebo, SOM duration was significantly reduced ( P = .024; median, 1.5 v 19 days). SOM incidence (43% v 65%; P = .009) and severity (grade 4 incidence, 16% v 30%; P = .045) also were improved. Intermediate improvements were seen with the 30-mg dose. Safety was comparable across arms, with no significant GC4419-specific toxicity nor increase of known toxicities of IMRT plus cisplatin. The 2-year follow-up for tumor outcomes is ongoing.

          CONCLUSION

          GC4419 at a dose of 90 mg produced a significant, clinically meaningful reduction of SOM duration, incidence, and severity with acceptable safety. A phase III trial (ROMAN; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03689712) has begun.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiation treatment for head and neck carcinoma.

          The current study was conducted to characterize the risks and clinical consequences of oral mucositis (OM) in patients with head and neck carcinoma (HNC) who are receiving radiation therapy. Data regarding 450 HNC patients who had received radiation therapy were collected via chart review from 154 U.S. medical and radiation oncologists. Information obtained included patient characteristics, treatments received, highest recorded grade of OM during radiation therapy (none, mild, moderate, or severe), and outcomes potentially associated with mucosal injury. The mean age (+/- standard deviation [SD]) of the study subjects was 61.3 years (12.3 yrs); the majority of patients (80%) were men. Primary tumor locations included the oropharynx (26.4%), larynx (26.4%), oral cavity including the lip (24.4%), hypopharynx (13.6%), and nasopharynx (9.1%). The majority of tumors were new and were classified as AJCC Stages III or IV. The majority of patients (83%) received standard radiation therapy; the mean (+/- SD) cumulative dose was 6285 centigrays (cGy) (+/- 1158 cGy). Approximately 33% of the patients received concomitant chemotherapy. The majority of patients (83%) developed OM; 29% developed severe OM. Patients with severe OM were more likely to have nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal tumors (adjusted odds ratio [OR] of 10.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.1-49.9] and 6.9 [95% CI, 2.4-19.7], respectively), and to have received cumulative radiation doses > 5000 cGy (OR of 10.4; 95% CI, 2.9-37.1) and concomitant chemotherapy (OR of 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4-8.0). Patients with OM had more unplanned breaks in radiation therapy (OR of 3.8; 95% CI, 1.7-8.5) and hospital admissions (OR of 3.5; 95% CI, 1.3-9.5). HNC patients with nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal tumors, and those who receive cumulative radiation doses > 5000 cGy or concomitant chemotherapy, are more likely to develop OM. Patients with OM are at a higher risk of unplanned breaks in radiation therapy and hospitalization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient-reported measurements of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: demonstration of increased frequency, severity, resistance to palliation, and impact on quality of life.

            The risk, severity, and patient-reported outcomes of radiation-induced mucositis among head and neck cancer patients were prospectively estimated. A validated, patient-reported questionnaire (OMDQ), the FACT quality of life (QOL), and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) fatigue scales were used to measure mucositis (reported as mouth and throat soreness), daily functioning, and use of analgesics. Patients were studied before radiotherapy (RT), daily during RT, and for 4 weeks after RT. Contrary to previous reports, the risk of mucositis was virtually identical in the 126 patients with oral cavity or oropharynx tumors (99% overall; 85% grade 3-4) compared with 65 patients with tumors of the larynx or hypopharynx (98% overall; 77% grade 3-4). The mean QOL score decreased significantly during RT, from 85.1 at baseline to 69.0 at Week 6, corresponding with the peak of mucositis severity. The mean functional status score decreased by 33% from 18.3 at baseline to 12.3 at Week 6. The impact of mucositis on QOL was proportional to its severity, although even a score of 1 or 2 (mild or moderate) was associated with a significant reduction in QOL (from 93.6 at baseline to 74.7 at Week 6). Despite increases in analgesic use from 34% at baseline to 80% at Week 6, mean mucositis scores exceeded 2.5 at Week 6. Mucositis occurs among virtually all patients who are undergoing radiation treatment of head and neck cancers. The detrimental effects on QOL and functional status are significant, and opioid analgesia provides inadequate relief. Preventive rather than symptom palliation measures are needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Radiation treatment breaks and ulcerative mucositis in head and neck cancer.

              Unplanned radiation treatment breaks and prolongation of the radiation treatment time are associated with lower survival and locoregional control rates when radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy is used in the curative treatment of head and neck cancer. Treatment of head and neck cancer is intense, involving high-dose, continuous radiotherapy, and often adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy. As the intensity of treatment regimens has escalated in recent years, clinical outcomes generally have improved. However, more intensive therapy also increases the incidence of treatment-related toxicities, particularly those impacting the mucosal lining of the oral cavity, pharynx, and cervical esophagus, and results in varying degrees of ulcerative mucositis. Ulcerative mucositis is a root cause of unscheduled radiation treatment breaks, which prolongs the total radiation treatment time. Alterations in radiotherapy and chemotherapy, including the use of continuous (i.e., 7 days/week) radiotherapy to ensure constant negative proliferative pressure, may improve efficacy outcomes. However, these approaches also increase the incidence of ulcerative mucositis, thereby increasing the incidence of unplanned radiation treatment breaks. Conversely, the reduction of ulcerative mucositis to minimize unplanned breaks in radiotherapy may enhance not only tolerability, but also efficacy outcomes. Several strategies to prevent ulcerative mucositis in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer have been evaluated, but none have demonstrated strong efficacy. Continued investigation is needed to identify superior radiation treatment regimens, technology, and supportive care that reduce unplanned radiation treatment breaks with the goal of improving clinical outcomes in head and neck cancer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Oncol
                J. Clin. Oncol
                jco
                jco
                JCO
                Journal of Clinical Oncology
                American Society of Clinical Oncology
                0732-183X
                1527-7755
                1 December 2019
                16 October 2019
                16 October 2019
                : 37
                : 34
                : 3256-3265
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
                [ 2 ]Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA
                [ 3 ]North East Cancer Centre, Health Sciences North, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
                [ 4 ]Spartanburg Medical Center, Spartanburg, SC
                [ 5 ]University of Louisville/James Graham Brown Cancer Center, Louisville, KY
                [ 6 ]University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA
                [ 7 ]HOPE Cancer Center of East Texas, Tyler, TX
                [ 8 ]East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
                [ 9 ]Texas Oncology, Plano West, Plano, TX
                [ 10 ]Pasco Pinellas Cancer Center, Holiday, FL
                [ 11 ]Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
                [ 12 ]Renown Regional Medical Center, Reno, NV
                [ 13 ]Mountain States Health Alliance, Johnson City, TN
                [ 14 ]Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ
                [ 15 ]Ashland-Bellefonte Cancer Center, Ashland, KY
                [ 16 ]Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
                [ 17 ]Goshen Center for Cancer Care, Goshen, IN
                [ 18 ]James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
                [ 19 ]St Luke’s Cancer Center and Temple University, Easton, PA
                [ 20 ]Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
                [ 21 ]University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
                [ 22 ]Galera Therapeutics, Malvern, PA
                [ 23 ]Statistics Collaborative, Washington, DC
                [ 24 ]Primary Endpoint Solutions, Watertown, MA
                [ 25 ]Willis-Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA
                Author notes
                Carryn M. Anderson, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, 52242; e-mail: carryn-anderson@ 123456uiowa.edu .
                Article
                1901507
                10.1200/JCO.19.01507
                6881100
                31618127
                10d22f79-60ca-414d-915d-9dc2ac2bfa66
                © 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

                Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 10 September 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 28, Pages: 17
                Categories
                HNC6, Combined Modality
                HNC4, Radiation
                CMPL4, Treatment-Related Complications: Supportive Care
                SPEC15, Specialty: Radiation Oncology
                SPEC10, Otolaryngology
                ORIGINAL REPORTS
                Head and Neck Cancer
                Custom metadata
                v1

                Comments

                Comment on this article