6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The Utility of Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting Ease of Performance of Spinal Anesthesia in an Orthopedic Patient Population :

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Anticoagulants and spinal-epidural anesthesia.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ultrasonography of the adult thoracic and lumbar spine for central neuraxial blockade.

            The role of ultrasound in central neuraxial blockade has been underappreciated, partly because of the relative efficacy of the landmark-guided technique and partly because of the perceived difficulty in imaging through the narrow acoustic windows produced by the bony framework of the spine. However, this also is the basis for the utility of ultrasound: an interlaminar window that permits passage of sound waves into the vertebral canal also will permit passage of a needle. In addition, ultrasound aids in identification of intervertebral levels, estimation of the depth to epidural and intrathecal spaces, and location of important landmarks, including the midline and interlaminar spaces. This can facilitate neuraxial blockade, particularly in patients with difficult surface anatomic landmarks. In this review article, the authors summarize the current literature, describe the key ultrasonographic views, and propose a systematic approach to ultrasound imaging for the performance of spinal and epidural anesthesia in the adult patient.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predictors of successful neuraxial block: a prospective study.

              The epidural and subarachnoid spaces should be identified at the first attempt, since multiple punctures increase the risk of postdural puncture headache, epidural haematoma and neural trauma. The study aimed to describe the predictors of successful neuraxial blocks at the first attempt. After institutional Review Board approval, 1481 patients undergoing spinal or epidural anaesthesia were prospectively enrolled. For each block we recorded: gender, age, height, weight, body habitus, anatomical landmarks (palpability of the spinous processes), spinal anatomy, patient positioning, premedication, needle type and gauge, approach, spinal level of the block, and the provider's level of experience. Retrieval of cerebrospinal fluid or loss of resistance to saline or air identified the subarachnoid and epidural spaces, respectively. The outcome variable was the first attempt success or failure (whether or not the needle was correctly located with one skin puncture and produced adequate surgical anaesthesia). Backward stepwise logistic regression tested its association with the other variables. The first-attempt rate of success was 61.51%. Independent predictors (Odds ratio, 95% confidence limits) were the quality of anatomical landmarks (1.92 (1.57; 2.35)), the provider's level of experience (1.24 (1.15; 1.33)) and the adequacy of patient positioning (3.84 (2.84; 5.19)). The successful location of the subarachnoid or the epidural space at the first attempt is influenced by the quality of patients' anatomical landmarks, the adequacy of patient positioning and the provider's level of experience.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
                Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                1098-7339
                2013
                2013
                : 38
                : 1
                : 34-38
                Article
                10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182734927
                23143015
                11fd91ae-9d90-4195-b2e6-3eb1d308c22b
                © 2013
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article