1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Paravertebral block: anatomy and relevant safety issues

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Paravertebral block, especially thoracic paravertebral block, is an effective regional anesthetic technique that can provide significant analgesia for numerous surgical procedures, including breast surgery, pulmonary surgery, and herniorrhaphy. The technique, although straightforward, is not devoid of potential adverse effects. Proper anatomic knowledge and adequate technique may help decrease the risk of these effects. In this brief discourse, we discuss the anatomy and technical aspects of paravertebral blocks and emphasize the importance of appropriate needle manipulation in order to minimize the risk of complications. We propose that, when using a landmark-based approach, limiting medial and lateral needle orientation and implementing caudal (rather than cephalad) needle redirection may provide an extra margin of safety when performing this technique. Likewise, recognizing a target that is not in close proximity to the neurovascular bundle when using ultrasound guidance may be beneficial.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blockade: a cadaveric study.

          Multiple approaches to the paravertebral space have been described to produce analgesia after thoracic surgery. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has the potential to improve efficacy and reduce complications via real-time visualization of the paravertebral space, surrounding structures, and the approaching needle. We compared a single- versus dual-injection technique for ultrasound-guided paravertebral blockade in a cadaver model, evaluating the spread of contrast dye and location of a catheter. Thirty paravertebral injections and 20 catheter placements were performed on 10 fresh cadavers. The paravertebral space was identified using an ultrasound probe in the transverse plane using a linear transducer. An in-plane needle approach was used. Using analine contrast dye, a single 20-mL injection at T6-7 on one side and a dual-injection technique of 10 mL at T3-4 and T7-8 on the contralateral side were performed on each cadaver, followed by insertion of a catheter through the needle. The cadaver was then dissected to evaluate spread of contrast dye and catheter location. The paravertebral space was easily identified with ultrasound on each cadaver. Contrast dye was seen to surround somatic and sympathetic nerves in the paravertebral, intercostal, and epidural spaces. Contrast dye was present in 19 of 20 paravertebral spaces over 3 to 4 segments (range, 0-10) with no significant differences between single- and dual-injection techniques. Contrast dye spread more extensively across intercostal segments with 4.5 spaces (range, 2-10) covered with a single injection and 6 spaces (range, 2-8) covered with a dual-injection technique (P = 0.03). There was epidural spread of contrast in 40% of paravertebral injections in both single- and dual-injection techniques. Catheters were located in the paravertebral space (60%), prevertebral space (20%), and epidural space (5%). Transverse in-plane ultrasound-guided needle insertion into the thoracic paravertebral space is both feasible and reliable. However, paravertebral spread of contrast is highly variable with intercostal and epidural spread likely contributing significantly to the analgesic efficacy. A dual-injection technique at separate levels seems to cover more thoracic dermatomes because of greater segmental intercostal spread (rather than paravertebral spread) than a single-injection approach. Catheters are located in nonideal positions in 40% of cases using this in-plane technique.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications.

            The failure rate and complications were studied prospectively in 367 paediatric and adult patients who had received a thoracic or lumbar paravertebral block. The overall failure rate was 10.1%; adults 10.7%; children 6.2%. The frequency of complications were: hypotension: 4.6%; vascular puncture: 3.8%; pleural puncture: 1.1%; pneumothorax: 0.5%. Since these results are similar to those found with alternative methods, e.g. epidural, intrapleural and intercostal blocks, paravertebral block can be recommended as an effective, safe technique for unilateral analgesia in both adults and children.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of the Spread of Local Anesthetic Solution after Ultrasound-guided Lateral Thoracic Paravertebral Blockade

              This study was designed to examine the spread of local anesthetic (LA) via magnetic resonance imaging after a standardized ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blockade.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Anesthesiol
                Korean J Anesthesiol
                KJA
                Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
                Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
                2005-6419
                2005-7563
                October 2020
                16 March 2020
                : 73
                : 5
                : 394-400
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
                [2 ]Department of Anesthesiology, Olympia Anesthesia Associates, Providence St. Peter Hospital, Olympia, WA, USA
                [3 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Alberto E Ardon, M.D., M.P.H. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224 Tel: +1-904-956-3327 Fax: +1-904-956-3332 Email: ardon.alberto@ 123456mayo.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9860-5811
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7226-4000
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6354-7447
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-7564
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9732-0286
                Article
                kja-20065
                10.4097/kja.20065
                7533185
                32172551
                123efb4d-db78-4e0a-bd09-83010b552210
                Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2020

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 February 2020
                : 5 March 2020
                : 15 March 2020
                Categories
                Review Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                anatomy,paravertebral,postoperative pain,regional anesthesia,safety,truncal nerve block

                Comments

                Comment on this article