44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Fatigue and health-related quality of life in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis after 2 years glatiramer acetate treatment are predicted by changes at 6 months: an observational multi-center study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Observational studies of up to 12 months duration showed that glatiramer acetate (GA) treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis may result in decreased fatigue and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with no changes in disability or mood. We investigated whether in the second year of treatment these improvements are sustained, disability or mood yet improved, and 2-year changes may be predicted by changes in the first 6 or 12 months. The multi-center FOCUS-Extension study was a prospective extension of the 12-month, international, observational FOCUS study and included 67 patients (38 treatment-naïve, 29 pre-treated) of the Dutch FOCUS cohort. Fatigue, HRQoL, depression and disability were measured by the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (LMSQoL) questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory-Short Form and the Guy’s Neurological Disability Scale. A 2-year period of GA treatment was associated with −0.52 and +0.66 standard deviation changes in mean FIS and LMSQoL scores compared to baseline, whereas disability and mood remained unchanged. For FIS and LMSQoL, the Pearson correlation coefficients between 6-month changes and 2-year scores were 0.47 and 0.50, and between 12-month changes and 2-year scores 0.65 and 0.62. After 2 years GA treatment, the improvements in fatigue and HRQoL observed at 1 year are sustained, whereas disability and mood remain unchanged compared to baseline. Moreover, the levels of fatigue and HRQoL at 2 years GA treatment are predicted by the improvements at 6 months.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation of the fatigue impact scale.

          The fatigue impact scale (FIS) was developed to improve our understanding of the effects of fatigue on quality of life. The FIS examines patients' perceptions of the functional limitations that fatigue has caused over the past month. FIS items reflect perceived impact on cognitive, physical, and psychosocial functioning. This study compared 145 patients referred for investigation of chronic fatigue (ChF) with 105 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 34 patients with mild hypertension (HT). Internal consistency for the FIS and its three subscales was > .87 for all analyses. Fatigue impact was highest for the ChF group although the MS group's reported fatigue also exceeded that of the HT group. Discriminant function analysis correctly classified 80.0% of the ChF group and 78.1% of the MS group when these groups were compared. This initial validation study indicates that the FIS has considerable merit as a measure of patient's attribution of functional limitations to symptoms of fatigue.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Short form of depression inventory: cross-validation.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population.

              Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients accumulate both physical and mental health problems along with disease progression. Valid and sensitive outcome measures are important to measure disease effects and the effect of treatment. The objective of this study was to test the performance of the physical and mental summary scales of SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36. The scales were evaluated by comparing the scores of a cohort of 194 MS patients with general population data and using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the Incapacity Status Scale-mental as criterion variables for physical functioning and mental health. All 3 physical summary scales were markedly reduced and correlated highly with the EDSS. The SF-36 mental summary score was only slightly reduced among MS patients (0.2 SD) compared with the general population, despite significantly reduced scores on all 4 health scales being most related to mental health and despite a high prevalence of mental health problems. This results from the poor physical functioning (mean scale score, 2.3 SD below the general population) and the orthogonal factor rotation used to derive independent measures of physical and mental health. Similar results were found for the SF-12. The nonorthogonal RAND-36 physical and mental summary scores were both markedly reduced. This is more compatible with the disease progression in MS and the results of the other measures of physical and mental health used in the study. The SF-36 and SF-12 mental health summary scales appear to overestimate mental health in people with MS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-24-3239146 , +31-6-14037368 , ms4ri@kpnmail.nl
                Journal
                J Neurol
                J. Neurol
                Journal of Neurology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0340-5354
                1432-1459
                3 May 2014
                3 May 2014
                2014
                : 261
                : 1469-1476
                Affiliations
                [ ]MS4 Research Institute, Ubbergseweg 34, 6522 KJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Nuvisan GmbH, Wegenerstraße 13, 89231 Neu-Ulm, Germany
                [ ]Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, PO Box 3200, 4380 DD Vlissingen, The Netherlands
                [ ]St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
                [ ]Academic Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Viecuri Medical Centre, Merseloseweg 130, 5801 CE Venray, The Netherlands
                [ ]St. Laurentius Hospital, Monseigneur Driessenstraat 6, 6043 CV Roermond, The Netherlands
                [ ]St. Elisabeth Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [ ]Bernhoven Hospital, Nistelrodeseweg 10, 5406 PT Uden, The Netherlands
                [ ]St. Franciscus Hospital, Boerhaavelaan 25, 4708 AE Roosendaal, The Netherlands
                [ ]St. Anna Hospital, Bogardeind 2, 5664 EH Geldrop, The Netherlands
                Article
                7363
                10.1007/s00415-014-7363-2
                4119257
                24792727
                1318b706-7fb4-4c28-9017-77f5ffc482c3
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

                History
                : 6 March 2014
                : 18 April 2014
                : 18 April 2014
                Categories
                Original Communication
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

                Neurology
                multiple sclerosis,relapsing remitting,glatiramer acetate,fatigue,quality of life
                Neurology
                multiple sclerosis, relapsing remitting, glatiramer acetate, fatigue, quality of life

                Comments

                Comment on this article