12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Coronary risk factors, endothelial function, and atherosclerosis: A review

      Clinical Cardiology
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The traditional risk factors for coronary heart disease, which include hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, and high-fat diet, have all been associated with impairments in endothelial function. Impaired endothelium function may promote the development of atherosclerosis through its effects on vasoregulation, platelet and monocyte adhesion, vascular smooth muscle cell growth, and coagulation. Increased oxidative stress may be another mechanism by which endothelial dysfunction contributes to atherosclerosis, although controversy exists on this issue. Risk factor modification, particularly lowering elevated concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, improves endothelial function. At least seven clinical studies have demonstrated improved endothelial function with cholesterol reductions in patients with markedly elevated or even borderline elevations in cholesterol concentrations, whether or not coronary heart disease is present. Other interventions that improve endothelial function include blood pressure reduction, smoking cessation, and administration of estrogen to postmenopausal women.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine.

          Despite its very potent vasodilating action in vivo, acetylcholine (ACh) does not always produce relaxation of isolated preparations of blood vessels in vitro. For example, in the helical strip of the rabbit descending thoracic aorta, the only reported response to ACh has been graded contractions, occurring at concentrations above 0.1 muM and mediated by muscarinic receptors. Recently, we observed that in a ring preparation from the rabbit thoracic aorta, ACh produced marked relaxation at concentrations lower than those required to produce contraction (confirming an earlier report by Jelliffe). In investigating this apparent discrepancy, we discovered that the loss of relaxation of ACh in the case of the strip was the result of unintentional rubbing of its intimal surface against foreign surfaces during its preparation. If care was taken to avoid rubbing of the intimal surface during preparation, the tissue, whether ring, transverse strip or helical strip, always exhibited relaxation to ACh, and the possibility was considered that rubbing of the intimal surface had removed endothelial cells. We demonstrate here that relaxation of isolated preparations of rabbit thoracic aorta and other blood vessels by ACh requires the presence of endothelial cells, and that ACh, acting on muscarinic receptors of these cells, stimulates release of a substance(s) that causes relaxation of the vascular smooth muscle. We propose that this may be one of the principal mechanisms for ACh-induced vasodilation in vivo. Preliminary reports on some aspects of the work have been reported elsewhere.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Beyond cholesterol. Modifications of low-density lipoprotein that increase its atherogenicity.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Close relation of endothelial function in the human coronary and peripheral circulations.

              The relation between endothelium-dependent vasodilator function in the brachial and coronary arteries was determined in the same subjects. Coronary artery endothelial dysfunction precedes the development of overt atherosclerosis and is important in its pathogenesis. A noninvasive assessment of endothelial function in a peripheral conduit vessel, the brachial artery, was recently described, but the relation between brachial artery function and coronary artery vasodilator function has not been explored. In 50 patients referred to the catheterization laboratory for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (mean age +/- SD 56 +/- 10 years), the coronary vasomotor response to serial intracoronary infusions of the endothelium-dependent agonist acetylcholine (10(-8) to 10(-6) mol/liter), was studied. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was also assessed in the brachial artery by measuring the change in brachial artery diameter in response to reactive hyperemia. Patients with coronary artery endothelial dysfunction manifested as vasoconstriction in response to acetylcholine had significantly impaired flow-mediated vasodilation in the brachial artery compared with that of patients with normal coronary endothelial function (4.8 +/- 5.5% vs. 10.8 +/- 7.6%, p < 0.01). Patients with coronary artery disease also had an attenuated brachial artery vasodilator response compared with that of patients with angiographically smooth coronary arteries (4.5 +/- 4.6% vs. 9.7 +/- 8.1%, p < 0.02). By multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of reduced brachial dilator responses to flow were baseline brachial artery diameter (p < 0.001), coronary endothelial dysfunction (p = 0.003), the presence of coronary artery disease (p = 0.007) and cigarette smoking (p = 0.016). The brachial artery vasodilator response to sublingual nitroglycerin was independent of coronary endothelial responses or the presence of coronary artery disease. The positive predictive value of abnormal brachial dilation ( < 3%) in predicting coronary endothelial dysfunction is 95%. This study demonstrated a close relation between coronary artery endothelium-dependent vasomotor responses to acetylcholine and flow-mediated vasodilation in the brachial artery. This noninvasive method may become a useful surrogate in assessing the predisposition to atherosclerosis in patients with cardiac risk factors.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                CLC
                Clinical Cardiology
                Clin Cardiol
                Wiley
                01609289
                19328737
                May 1997
                May 1997
                : 20
                : 5
                : 426-432
                Article
                10.1002/clc.4960200505
                6656192
                9134272
                14f70785-6662-4713-919d-8e51e84ef9d3
                © 1997

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article