1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A possible role for sarcosine in the management of schizophrenia

      The British Journal of Psychiatry
      Royal College of Psychiatrists

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Sarcosine, which is freely sold as a dietary supplement, has pharmacological activity to boost functioning of the glutamatergic N-methyl- d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) and hence it is a biologically rational treatment for schizophrenia. The small number of studies carried out to date provide some evidence for its efficacy and psychiatrists could consider suggesting its use to their patients.

          Declaration of interest

          D.C. is involved in schizophrenia-related genetics research that implicates the same system as is targeted by sarcosine.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A phase II/III trial of bitopertin monotherapy compared with placebo in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia - results from the CandleLyte study.

          Bitopertin is a glycine reuptake inhibitor postulated to improve N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor hypofunction by increasing synaptic glycine concentrations. This randomised, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase II/III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of bitopertin monotherapy over 4 weeks in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Of 301 patients randomised, 299 received placebo (n=80), bitopertin 10mg (n=80) or 30mg (n=77), or olanzapine 15mg (n=62). The primary endpoint, change from baseline in mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score, showed non-statistically significant improvements with bitopertin 30mg and olanzapine vs. placebo: bitopertin 10mg (-11.7; standard error [SE], 1.89; p=0.945), bitopertin 30mg (-15.3; SE, 1.87; p=0.211), olanzapine (-14.9; SE, 2.13; p=0.295) and placebo (-11.9; SE, 1.90). The PANSS positive subscale score, a secondary endpoint, also showed improvement with bitopertin 30mg (p=0.030) whereas a trend was observed with olanzapine (p=0.072) vs. placebo. Although not statistically significant, bitopertin 30mg and olanzapine reduced overall illness severity (Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale; p=0.098 and p=0.126, respectively). More patients receiving bitopertin 30mg (51.3%) or olanzapine (52.5%) than placebo (32.9%) were ready for hospital discharge at Week 4 (bitopertin, p=0.014; olanzapine, p=0.024). In summary, this study failed due to lack of statistical separation of either bitopertin or olanzapine (active control) from placebo on the primary endpoint. Of interest, improved positive symptoms and readiness for hospital discharge were associated with both bitopertin and olanzapine treatment. Bitopertin was safe and well tolerated in this study.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Serum levels of TNF-alpha in patients with chronic schizophrenia during treatment augmentation with sarcosine (results of the PULSAR study)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmacological assessment of the role of the glycine transporter GlyT-1 in mediating high-affinity glycine uptake by rat cerebral cortex and cerebellum synaptosomes.

              Two distinct types of glycine transporter, GlyT-1 and GlyT-2, have been characterised. GlyT-1 and GlyT-2 are known to be differentially expressed amongst CNS areas, but direct functional evidence for their relative contributions to high-affinity glycine uptake by brain tissues is lacking. In the present study, we have used the selective GlyT-1 inhibitor N[3-(4"-fluorophenyl)-3-(4"-phenylphenoxy)propyl]sarcosine (NFPS) to investigate the role of GlyT-1 in mediating glycine uptake. HEK293 cells expressing human GlyT-1c or GlyT-2 showed high levels of Na(+)-dependent glycine uptake, with K(m) values of 117+/-13 and 200+/-22 microM, respectively. NFPS potently inhibited uptake in GlyT-1c cells (IC(50) value 0.22+/-0.03 microM), being around 500-fold more potent than glycine or sarcosine, but had no effect on uptake in GlyT-2 cells (IC(50) >10 microM). Efflux of pre-loaded [3H]-glycine from GlyT-1c cells was increased by glycine or sarcosine, whereas NFPS had no effect on its own but blocked the effects of glycine or sarcosine. These results confirm that NFPS is a potent, selective and non-transportable GlyT-1 inhibitor. Rat cortex and cerebellum synaptosomes also showed a high-affinity Na(+)-dependent component of glycine uptake, with affinities similar to those observed for uptake in GlyT-1c or GlyT-2 cells. In cortex synaptosomes, NFPS and sarcosine produced the same maximal inhibition of uptake as glycine itself. However, in cerebellum synaptosomes, the maximal inhibition produced by NFPS and sarcosine was only half that produced by glycine. In both tissues NFPS was around 1000-fold more potent than glycine or sarcosine. Overall, our findings indicate that high-affinity glycine uptake in cerebral cortex occurs predominantly via GlyT-1. However, in cerebellum, only a part of the high-affinity uptake is mediated by GlyT-1, with the remaining NFPS-insensitive component most likely mediated by GlyT-2.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The British Journal of Psychiatry
                Br J Psychiatry
                Royal College of Psychiatrists
                0007-1250
                1472-1465
                September 10 2019
                : 1-2
                Article
                10.1192/bjp.2019.194
                31685041
                14fd17a2-6085-475f-a0f3-65fd0adba7bc
                © 2019

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article