1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      West Nile virus in Europe: after action reviews of preparedness and response to the 2018 transmission season in Italy, Slovenia, Serbia and Greece

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          After Action Reviews (AAR) with a One Health perspective were performed in Slovenia, Italy, Serbia and Greece following a severe West Nile virus (WNV) transmission season in 2018. A protocol combining traditional techniques and organizational process analysis was developed and then implemented in each country.

          Results

          In 2018, response to the unusually intense transmission season of WNV in Slovenia, Italy, Serbia and Greece took place through routine response mechanisms. None of the four countries declared a national or subnational emergency. We found a very strong consensus on the strengths identified in responding to this event. All countries indicated the availability of One Health Plans for surveillance and response; very high laboratory diagnostic capacity in the human, veterinary and entomology sectors and strong inter-sectoral collaboration with strong commitment of engaged institutions as critical in the management of the event. Finally, countries implementing One Health surveillance for WNV (in terms of early warning and early activation of prevention measures) consistently reported a positive impact on their activities, in particular when combining mosquito and bird surveillance with surveillance of cases in humans and equids. Recurring priority areas for improvement included: increasing knowledge on vector-control measures, ensuring the sustainability of vector monitoring and surveillance, and improving capacity to manage media pressure.

          Conclusions

          The AARs presented here demonstrate the benefit of cross-sectoral and cross-disciplinary approaches to preparedness for West Nile virus outbreaks in Europe. In the coming years, priorities include fostering and strengthening arrangements that: enable coordinated One Health surveillance and response during WNV transmission seasons; ensure adequate laboratory capacities; strengthen risk communication; and fund longer-term research to address the knowledge gaps identified in this study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Incubation periods of mosquito-borne viral infections: a systematic review.

          Mosquito-borne viruses are a major public health threat, but their incubation periods are typically uncited, non-specific, and not based on data. We systematically review the published literature on six mosquito-borne viruses selected for their public health importance: chikungunya, dengue, Japanese encephalitis, Rift Valley fever, West Nile, and yellow fever viruses. For each, we identify the literature's consensus on the incubation period, evaluate the evidence for this consensus, and provide detailed estimates of the incubation period and distribution based on published experimental and observational data. We abstract original data as doubly interval-censored observations. Assuming a log-normal distribution, we estimate the median incubation period, dispersion, 25th and 75th percentiles by maximum likelihood. We include bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals for each estimate. For West Nile and yellow fever viruses, we also estimate the 5th and 95th percentiles of their incubation periods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Early start of the West Nile fever transmission season 2018 in Europe

            In Europe, surveillance indicates that the 2018 West Nile fever transmission season started earlier than in previous years and with a steeper increase of locally-acquired human infections. Between 2014 and 2017, European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) and EU enlargement countries notified five to 25 cases in weeks 25 to 31 compared with 168 cases in 2018. Clinicians and public health authorities should be alerted to ensure timely implementation of prevention measures including blood safety measures.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence and molecular epidemiology of West Nile and Usutu virus infections in Croatia in the ‘One health’ context, 2018

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                flavia.riccardo@iss.it
                Journal
                Global Health
                Global Health
                Globalization and Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1744-8603
                18 May 2020
                18 May 2020
                2020
                : 16
                : 47
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.416651.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9120 6856, Department of Infectious Diseases, , National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ISS), ; Rome, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.21003.30, ISNI 0000 0004 1762 1962, OrgLab, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, ; Cassino, Italy
                [3 ]GRID grid.414776.7, Nacionalni inštitut za javno zdravje, ; Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [4 ]Institut za Javno Zdravlje Srbije “Dr Milan Jovanović Batut”, Belgrade, Serbia
                [5 ]GRID grid.415788.7, ISNI 0000 0004 1756 9674, Italian Ministry of Health, ; Rome, Italy
                [6 ]Hellenic National Public Health Organization, Athens, Greece
                [7 ]GRID grid.418914.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1791 8889, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), ; Stockholm, Sweden
                Article
                568
                10.1186/s12992-020-00568-1
                7236470
                32423479
                156671e4-668a-42c5-ade4-ce9784590d00
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 9 September 2019
                : 9 April 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000805, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control;
                Award ID: ECD.9147
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Health & Social care
                preparedness,west nile virus,after action reviews,epidemics,outbreaks,infectious disease,mosquito-borne disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article