7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In silico dynamics of COVID-19 phenotypes for optimizing clinical management

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          A distinctive feature of COVID-19 is its extreme heterogeneity—illness ranges from minimally symptomatic to life threatening. Heterogeneity results from a poorly understood combination of patient factors, viral dynamics, antiviral and immune modulating therapies, and dynamics of the innate and adaptive immune responses. In order to better understand clinical heterogeneity and optimal treatment, we developed a comprehensive mathematical model incorporating elements of the innate and adaptive immune responses, the renin−angiotensin system (which the virus exploits for cellular entry), rates of viral replication, inflammatory cytokines, and the coagulation cascade. Our model reveals divergent treatment responses and clinical outcomes as a function of comorbidities, age, and details of the innate and adaptive immune responses which can provide a framework for understanding individual patients’ trajectories.

          Abstract

          Understanding the underlying mechanisms of COVID-19 progression and the impact of various pharmaceutical interventions is crucial for the clinical management of the disease. We developed a comprehensive mathematical framework based on the known mechanisms of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, incorporating the renin−angiotensin system and ACE2, which the virus exploits for cellular entry, key elements of the innate and adaptive immune responses, the role of inflammatory cytokines, and the coagulation cascade for thrombus formation. The model predicts the evolution of viral load, immune cells, cytokines, thrombosis, and oxygen saturation based on patient baseline condition and the presence of comorbidities. Model predictions were validated with clinical data from healthy people and COVID-19 patients, and the results were used to gain insight into identified risk factors of disease progression including older age; comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, and hypertension; and dysregulated immune response. We then simulated treatment with various drug classes to identify optimal therapeutic protocols. We found that the outcome of any treatment depends on the sustained response rate of activated CD8 + T cells and sufficient control of the innate immune response. Furthermore, the best treatment—or combination of treatments—depends on the preinfection health status of the patient. Our mathematical framework provides important insight into SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and could be used as the basis for personalized, optimal management of COVID-19.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 — Final Report

          Abstract Background Although several therapeutic agents have been evaluated for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), none have yet been shown to be efficacious. Methods We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous remdesivir in adults hospitalized with Covid-19 with evidence of lower respiratory tract involvement. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remdesivir (200 mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 100 mg daily for up to 9 additional days) or placebo for up to 10 days. The primary outcome was the time to recovery, defined by either discharge from the hospital or hospitalization for infection-control purposes only. Results A total of 1063 patients underwent randomization. The data and safety monitoring board recommended early unblinding of the results on the basis of findings from an analysis that showed shortened time to recovery in the remdesivir group. Preliminary results from the 1059 patients (538 assigned to remdesivir and 521 to placebo) with data available after randomization indicated that those who received remdesivir had a median recovery time of 11 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 12), as compared with 15 days (95% CI, 13 to 19) in those who received placebo (rate ratio for recovery, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.55; P<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality by 14 days were 7.1% with remdesivir and 11.9% with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.04). Serious adverse events were reported for 114 of the 541 patients in the remdesivir group who underwent randomization (21.1%) and 141 of the 522 patients in the placebo group who underwent randomization (27.0%). Conclusions Remdesivir was superior to placebo in shortening the time to recovery in adults hospitalized with Covid-19 and evidence of lower respiratory tract infection. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ACTT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04280705.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            OpenSAFELY: factors associated with COVID-19 death in 17 million patients

            COVID-19 has rapidly impacted on mortality worldwide. 1 There is unprecedented urgency to understand who is most at risk of severe outcomes, requiring new approaches for timely analysis of large datasets. Working on behalf of NHS England we created OpenSAFELY: a secure health analytics platform covering 40% of all patients in England, holding patient data within the existing data centre of a major primary care electronic health records vendor. Primary care records of 17,278,392 adults were pseudonymously linked to 10,926 COVID-19 related deaths. COVID-19 related death was associated with: being male (hazard ratio 1.59, 95%CI 1.53-1.65); older age and deprivation (both with a strong gradient); diabetes; severe asthma; and various other medical conditions. Compared to people with white ethnicity, black and South Asian people were at higher risk even after adjustment for other factors (HR 1.48, 1.29-1.69 and 1.45, 1.32-1.58 respectively). We have quantified a range of clinical risk factors for COVID-19 related death in the largest cohort study conducted by any country to date. OpenSAFELY is rapidly adding further patients’ records; we will update and extend results regularly.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Remdesivir in adults with severe COVID-19: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial

              Summary Background No specific antiviral drug has been proven effective for treatment of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Remdesivir (GS-5734), a nucleoside analogue prodrug, has inhibitory effects on pathogenic animal and human coronaviruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro, and inhibits Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, SARS-CoV-1, and SARS-CoV-2 replication in animal models. Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial at ten hospitals in Hubei, China. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) admitted to hospital with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, with an interval from symptom onset to enrolment of 12 days or less, oxygen saturation of 94% or less on room air or a ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen of 300 mm Hg or less, and radiologically confirmed pneumonia. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to intravenous remdesivir (200 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg on days 2–10 in single daily infusions) or the same volume of placebo infusions for 10 days. Patients were permitted concomitant use of lopinavir–ritonavir, interferons, and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement up to day 28, defined as the time (in days) from randomisation to the point of a decline of two levels on a six-point ordinal scale of clinical status (from 1=discharged to 6=death) or discharged alive from hospital, whichever came first. Primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and safety analysis was done in all patients who started their assigned treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04257656. Findings Between Feb 6, 2020, and March 12, 2020, 237 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment group (158 to remdesivir and 79 to placebo); one patient in the placebo group who withdrew after randomisation was not included in the ITT population. Remdesivir use was not associated with a difference in time to clinical improvement (hazard ratio 1·23 [95% CI 0·87–1·75]). Although not statistically significant, patients receiving remdesivir had a numerically faster time to clinical improvement than those receiving placebo among patients with symptom duration of 10 days or less (hazard ratio 1·52 [0·95–2·43]). Adverse events were reported in 102 (66%) of 155 remdesivir recipients versus 50 (64%) of 78 placebo recipients. Remdesivir was stopped early because of adverse events in 18 (12%) patients versus four (5%) patients who stopped placebo early. Interpretation In this study of adult patients admitted to hospital for severe COVID-19, remdesivir was not associated with statistically significant clinical benefits. However, the numerical reduction in time to clinical improvement in those treated earlier requires confirmation in larger studies. Funding Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Emergency Project of COVID-19, National Key Research and Development Program of China, the Beijing Science and Technology Project.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                19 January 2021
                05 January 2021
                05 January 2021
                : 118
                : 3
                : e2021642118
                Affiliations
                [1] aCancer Biophysics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus , 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus;
                [2] bDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology , Tehran, Iran, 11155;
                [3] cEdwin L. Steele Laboratories, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02114;
                [4] dDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02114;
                [5] eDepartment of Medicine/Renal Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115;
                [6] fDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02114;
                [7] gDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02114
                Author notes

                Contributed by Rakesh K. Jain, December 2, 2020 (sent for review October 20, 2020; reviewed by Narendra M. Dixit and Libin Rong)

                Author contributions: C.C.H., A.B.P., A.V., M.J.K., S.D., T.S., L.L.M., and R.K.J. designed research; C.V., and M.R.N. performed research; C.V., M.R.N., T.S., and L.L.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; C.V., M.R.N., C.C.H., A.B.P., A.V., M.J.K., S.D., T.S., L.L.M., and R.K.J. analyzed data; C.V., M.R.N., C.C.H., A.B.P., A.V., M.J.K., S.D., T.S., L.L.M., and R.K.J. wrote the paper; and R.K.J. supervised the project.

                Reviewers: N.M.D., Indian Institute of Science Bangalore; and L.R., University of Florida.

                1C.V. and M.R.N. contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9497-6327
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3093-1696
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7571-3548
                Article
                202021642
                10.1073/pnas.2021642118
                7826337
                33402434
                15afe5c2-e626-4841-bc27-36214ae0a298
                Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) 100000054
                Award ID: R01-CA208205
                Award Recipient : Lance L Munn Award Recipient : Rakesh K Jain
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) 100000054
                Award ID: U01-CA 224348
                Award Recipient : Lance L Munn Award Recipient : Rakesh K Jain
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) 100000054
                Award ID: R35-CA197743
                Award Recipient : Lance L Munn Award Recipient : Rakesh K Jain
                Funded by: HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI) 100000054
                Award ID: R01-CA2044949
                Award Recipient : Lance L Munn Award Recipient : Rakesh K Jain
                Funded by: EC | FP7 | FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (FP7 Ideas) 100011199
                Award ID: ERC-2018-PoC-838414
                Award Recipient : Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos
                Funded by: EC | FP7 | FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (FP7 Ideas) 100011199
                Award ID: ERC-2019-CoG-863955
                Award Recipient : Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos
                Funded by: American Society of Nephrology (ASN) 100001463
                Award ID: Joseph A. Carlucci Research Fellowship
                Award Recipient : Ankit B Patel
                Categories
                Biological Sciences
                Medical Sciences
                Physical Sciences
                Engineering
                Custom metadata
                free

                sars-cov-2,covid-19,mathematical model,simulation
                sars-cov-2, covid-19, mathematical model, simulation

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content115

                Cited by16

                Most referenced authors3,008