29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reducing repeat pregnancies in adolescence: applying realist principles as part of a mixed-methods systematic review to explore what works, for whom, how and under what circumstances

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Previous research has demonstrated emotional, psychological and educational harm to young mothers following unintended conceptions. The UK has one of the highest rates of pregnancies in adolescence in Western Europe with a high proportion of these being repeat pregnancies, making it a topic of interest for public health policy makers, and health and social care practitioners. As part of a wider mixed-methods systematic review, realist principles were applied to synthesise evidence about interventions aiming to reduce repeat pregnancies in adolescence.

          Methods

          A multi-streamed, mixed-methods systematic review was conducted searching 11 major electronic databases and 9 additional databases from 1995 onwards, using key terms such as pregnancy, teen or adolescent. The principles of realist synthesis were applied to all included literature to uncover theories about what works, for whom, how and in what context. Initial theory areas were developed through evidence scoping, group discussion by the authors and stakeholder engagement to uncover context + mechanism = outcome (CMO) configurations and related narratives.

          Results

          The searches identified 8,664 documents initially, and 403 in repeat searches, filtering to 81 included studies, including qualitative studies, randomised controlled trials, quantitative studies and grey literature. Three CMO configurations were developed. The individual experiences of young mothers’ triggered self-efficacy, notions of perceived risks, susceptibility and benefits of pregnancy, resulting in the adolescent taking control of their fertility and sexual encounters. The choice between motherhood and other goals triggered notions of motivations, resulting in the adolescent managing their expectations of motherhood and controlling their fertility and sexual encounters. Barriers and facilitators to accessing services triggered notions of connectedness and self-determination; resulting in interventions that are tailored so they are relevant to young persons, and improve access to services and engagement with the issue of pregnancy in adolescence.

          Conclusions

          Pregnancy in adolescence is a complex issue with many factors to consider. The conceptual platform described here could help guide policy makers and professionals towards a number of areas that need to be attended to in order to increase the likelihood of an intervention working to prevent rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescence.

          Trial Registration

          PROSPERO CRD42012003168

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1066-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

          The Health Belief Model, social learning theory (recently relabelled social cognitive theory), self-efficacy, and locus of control have all been applied with varying success to problems of explaining, predicting, and influencing behavior. Yet, there is conceptual confusion among researchers and practitioners about the interrelationships of these theories and variables. This article attempts to show how these explanatory factors may be related, and in so doing, posits a revised explanatory model which incorporates self-efficacy into the Health Belief Model. Specifically, self-efficacy is proposed as a separate independent variable along with the traditional health belief variables of perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, and barriers. Incentive to behave (health motivation) is also a component of the model. Locus of control is not included explicitly because it is believed to be incorporated within other elements of the model. It is predicted that the new formulation will more fully account for health-related behavior than did earlier formulations, and will suggest more effective behavioral interventions than have hitherto been available to health educators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Childhood and Society

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                j.charles@bangor.ac.uk
                j.rycroft-malone@bangor.ac.uk
                rabeeah.aslam@gmail.com
                m.hendry@bangor.ac.uk
                d.pasterfield@bangor.ac.uk
                Rhiannon@whitres.co.uk
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                20 September 2016
                20 September 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 271
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Health Economics & Medicines Evaluation, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2PZ UK
                [2 ]School of Healthcare Sciences, Fron Heulog, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2EF UK
                [3 ]Liverpool Review and Implementation Group, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB UK
                [4 ]North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Gwenfro Units 4-8, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, UK
                [5 ]Whitaker Research Ltd. Cae Ffos, Treborth Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2RJ UK
                Article
                1066
                10.1186/s12884-016-1066-x
                5029024
                27644695
                1601d32b-a34d-46b1-b7f5-5085810b2917
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 14 June 2016
                : 10 September 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000664, Health Technology Assessment Programme;
                Award ID: 11/141/05
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                realist synthesis,mixed-methods systematic review,adolescent,teen,pregnancy

                Comments

                Comment on this article