21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Urinary estrogen metabolites and prostate cancer: a case-control study and meta-analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To investigate prostate cancer (Pca) risk in relation to estrogen metabolism, expressed as urinary 2-hydroxyestrone (2-OHE1), 16α-hydroxyestrone (16α-OHE1) and 2-OHE1 to 16α-OHE1 ratio.

          Methods

          We conducted a case-control study within the Western New York Health Cohort Study (WNYHCS) from 1996 to 2001. From January 2003 through September 2004, we completed the re-call and follow-up of 1092 cohort participants. Cases (n = 26) and controls (n = 110) were matched on age, race and recruitment period according to a 1:4 ratio. We used the unconditional logistic regression to compute crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confident interval (CI) of Pca in relation to 2-OHE1, 16αOHE1 and 2-OHE1 to 16α-OHE1 by tertiles of urine concentrations (stored in a biorepository for an average of 4 years). We identified age, race, education and body mass index as covariates. We also conducted a systematic review of the literature which revealed no additional studies, but we pooled the results from this study with those from a previously conducted case-control study using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects method.

          Results

          We observed a non-significant risk reduction in the highest tertile of 2-OHE1 (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.25-2.10). Conversely, the odds in the highest tertile of 16α-OHE1 showed a non-significant risk increase (OR 1.76 95% CI 0.62-4.98). There was a suggestion of reduced Pca risk for men in the highest tertile of 2-OHE1 to 16α-OHE1 ratio (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.19-1.68). The pooled estimates confirmed the association between an increased Pca risk and higher urinary levels of 16α-OHE1 (third vs. first tertile: OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.09-3.05) and the protective effect of a higher 2-OHE 1 to 16α-OHE1 ratio (third vs. first tertile: OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.90).

          Conclusion

          Our study and the pooled results provide evidence for a differential role of the estrogen hydroxylation pathway in Pca development and encourage further study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prospective study of sex hormone levels and risk of prostate cancer.

          Sex steroids, particularly androgens, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. Data from previous studies comparing circulating hormone levels in men with and without prostate cancer are difficult to interpret, since the studies were limited in size, hormone levels were analyzed in blood drawn after the diagnosis of cancer, nonrepresentative control subjects were used, and hormone and hormone-binding protein levels were not simultaneously adjusted. We conducted a prospective, nested case-control study to investigate whether plasma hormone and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels in healthy men were related to the subsequent development of prostate cancer. Among participants in the Physicians' Health Study who provided plasma samples in 1982, we identified 222 men who developed prostate cancer by March 1992. Three hundred ninety control subjects, matched to the case patients on the bases of age, smoking status, and length of follow-up, were also identified. Immunoassays were used to measure the levels of total testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), 3 alpha-androstanediol glucuronide (AAG), estradiol, SHBG, and prolactin in the stored (at -82 degrees C) plasma samples. Correlations between individual hormone levels and between hormone levels and SHBG in the plasma of control subjects were assessed by use of Spearman correlation coefficients (r). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) specifying the prostate cancer risk associated with quartile levels of individual hormones, before and after adjustment for other hormones and SHBG, were calculated by use of conditional logistic regression modeling. Reported P values are two-sided. No clear associations were found between the unadjusted levels of individual hormones or SHBG and the risk of prostate cancer. However, a strong correlation was observed between the levels of testosterone and SHBG (r = .55), and weaker correlations were detected between the levels of testosterone and the levels of both estradiol (r = .28) and DHT (r = .32) (all P 2.5 ng/mL) were excluded from the analyses. High levels of circulating testosterone and low levels of SHBG-both within normal endogenous ranges-are associated with increased risks of prostate cancer. Low levels of circulating estradiol may represent an additional risk factor. Circulating levels of DHT and AAG do not appear to be strongly related to prostate cancer risk.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Functional role of estrogen metabolism in target cells: review and perspectives.

            Cytochrome P450 enzymes that metabolize estrogens are expressed in the mammary gland, uterus, brain and other target tissues for estrogen action, and this results in the formation of hydroxylated estrogens in these tissues. Estradiol metabolites formed in target tissues at or near estrogen receptors may either be inactive or have important biological effects, and changes in the activities of estrogen-metabolizing enzymes in target tissues may profoundly influence estrogen action. Although some active estrogen metabolites exert hormonal effects in target tissues by interaction with the classical estrogen receptor, other metabolites appear to elicit unique biological responses that are not associated with activation of this receptor. Therefore, some of the many actions of estradiol may not be caused by estradiol per se, but may result from the formation of active estrogen metabolite(s) which function as local mediators or may activate their own unique receptors or effectors. This is an important area in need of more research. The present paper represents a review of the literature and perspectives by the authors on the functional role of estrogen metabolism in target tissues.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Estrogen metabolism and risk of breast cancer: a prospective study of the 2:16alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

              Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that 16alpha-hydroxylated estrogen metabolites, biologically strong estrogens, are associated with breast cancer risk, while 2-hydroxylated metabolites, with lower estrogenic activity, are weakly related to this disease. This study analyzes the association of breast cancer risk with estrogen metabolism, expressed as the ratio of 2-hydroxyestrone to 16alpha-hydroxyestrone, in a prospective nested case-control study. Between 1987 and 1992, 10,786 women (ages 35-69 years) were recruited to a prospective study on breast cancer in Italy, the "Hormones and Diet in the Etiology of Breast Cancer" (ORDET) study. Women with a history of cancer and women on hormone therapy were excluded at baseline. At recruitment, overnight urine was collected from all participants and stored at -80 degrees C. After an average of 5.5 years of follow-up, 144 breast cancer cases and four matched controls for each case were identified among the participants of the cohort. Among premenopausal women, a higher ratio of 2-hydroxyestrone to 16alpha-hydroxyestrone at baseline was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer: women in the highest quintile of the ratio had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for breast cancer of 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.25-1.34]. The corresponding adjusted OR in postmenopausal women was 1.29 (95% CI = 0.53-3.10). Results of this prospective study support the hypothesis that the estrogen metabolism pathway favoring 2-hydroxylation over 16alpha-hydroxylation is associated with a reduced risk of invasive breast cancer risk in premenopausal women.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Exp Clin Cancer Res
                Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR
                BioMed Central
                0392-9078
                1756-9966
                2009
                8 October 2009
                : 28
                : 1
                : 135
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Environmental, Agricultural and Occupational Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
                [3 ]Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
                [4 ]Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ]Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
                [6 ]Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
                [7 ]Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism & Diabetes, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
                [8 ]Translation Oncogenomics Unit/Lab B, National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
                [9 ]Department of Urology, National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
                [10 ]Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
                [11 ]Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
                [12 ]Scientific Direction, National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, Rome, Italy
                Article
                1756-9966-28-135
                10.1186/1756-9966-28-135
                2766371
                19814782
                1651abcb-a8d6-49ae-b84b-b50781cec148
                Copyright © 2009 Barba et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 July 2009
                : 8 October 2009
                Categories
                Review

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article