25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Epidemiology and Health Impacts of Neuroendocrine Tumors

      Submit here before August 30, 2024

      About Neuroendocrinology: 3.2 Impact Factor I 8.3 CiteScore I 1.009 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Real-World Clinical Experience with SGLT2 Inhibitors: Use of Special Screening Tool for Type 2 Diabetes Patients to Avoid Serious Adverse Events: A Single-Centre Prospective Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Promising results of clinical trials involving SGLT2 inhibitors urge every clinician managing diabetes to use them. However, upcoming real-world data still show increased incidence of adverse events, but efficacy is comparable to clinical trials. Objectives: Genitourinary infection is the most commonly reported adverse effect with SGLT2 inhibitors. We evaluated effectiveness of patient screening protocol and advice of hygiene and hydration to avoid adverse effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in real-world setting. Method: This was a prospective observational longitudinal study which included consecutive subjects with uncontrolled T2DM recommended with SGLT2i after a simple screening protocol from December 2017 to November 2018. The adverse effects and metabolic parameters were evaluated at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months for each patient. Results: Of 413 patients recommended for SGLT2 inhibitors, 335 patients started the medication. At baseline, average age, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and weight were 53 years, 9.5%, and 82 kg, respectively. Data of 332, 299, 270, and 231 patients were available at the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months for safety follow-up, respectively. Genitourinary tract infection was the most common adverse effect (8%) followed by ketosis (4%). Two patients needed to stop the drug permanently due to recurrent transient ischaemic attack and emphysematous pyelonephritis. Significant reduction in mean weight and HbA1c was observed at 6 months ( n = 270): 2.9 kg and 1.1%, respectively, and at 12 months ( n = 231): 3.8 kg and 1.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Simple screening protocol for patients considered for SGLT2i significantly reduced incidence of genitourinary adverse events.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

          Correction of hyperglycaemia and prevention of glucotoxicity are important objectives in the management of type 2 diabetes. Dapagliflozin, a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, reduces renal glucose reabsorption in an insulin-independent manner. We assessed the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin. In this phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial, 546 adults with type 2 diabetes who were receiving daily metformin (>/=1500 mg per day) and had inadequate glycaemic control were randomly assigned to receive one of three doses of dapagliflozin (2.5 mg, n=137; 5 mg, n=137; or 10 mg, n=135) or placebo (n=137) orally once daily. Randomisation was computer generated and stratified by site, implemented with a central, telephone-based interactive voice response system. Patients continued to receive their pre-study metformin dosing. The primary outcome was change from baseline in haemoglobin A(1c)(HbA(1c)) at 24 weeks. All randomised patients who received at least one dose of double-blind study medication and who had both a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement (last observation carried forward) were included in the analysis. Data were analysed by use of ANCOVA models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00528879. 534 patients were included in analysis of the primary endpoint (dapagliflozin 2.5 mg, n=135; dapagliflozin 5 mg, n=133; dapagliflozin 10 mg, n=132; placebo, n=134). At week 24, mean HbA(1c) had decreased by -0.30% (95% CI -0.44 to -0.16) in the placebo group, compared with -0.67% (-0.81 to -0.53, p=0.0002) in the dapagliflozin 2.5 mg group, -0.70% (-0.85 to -0.56, p<0.0001) in the dapagliflozin 5 mg group, and -0.84% (-0.98 to -0.70, p<0.0001) in the dapagliflozin 10 mg group. Symptoms of hypoglycaemia occurred in similar proportions of patients in the dapagliflozin (2-4%) and placebo groups (3%). Signs, symptoms, and other reports suggestive of genital infections were more frequent in the dapagliflozin groups (2.5 mg, 11 patients [8%]; 5 mg, 18 [13%]; 10 mg, 12 [9%]) than in the placebo group (seven [5%]). 17 patients had serious adverse events (four in each of the dapagliflozin groups and five in the placebo group). Addition of dapagliflozin to metformin provides a new therapeutic option for treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin alone. Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial of Triple Therapy With Dapagliflozin Add-on to Saxagliptin Plus Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes.

            To compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with dapagliflozin versus that with placebo add-on to saxagliptin plus metformin in patients whose type 2 diabetes is inadequately controlled with saxagliptin plus metformin treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Why Do SGLT2 Inhibitors Inhibit Only 30–50% of Renal Glucose Reabsorption in Humans?

              Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibition is a novel and promising treatment for diabetes under late-stage clinical development. It generally is accepted that SGLT2 mediates 90% of renal glucose reabsorption. However, SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical development inhibit only 30–50% of the filtered glucose load. Why are they unable to inhibit 90% of glucose reabsorption in humans? We will try to provide an explanation to this puzzle in this perspective analysis of the unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical trials and examine possible mechanisms and molecular properties that may be responsible.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                DDE
                10.1159/issn.2673-1738
                International Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism
                S. Karger AG
                2673-1797
                2673-1738
                2020
                December 2020
                09 September 2020
                : 26
                : 1
                : 38-43
                Affiliations
                [_a] aDepartment of Medicine, BAPS Shastriji Maharaj Hospital, Vadodara, India
                [_b] bDepartment of Epidemiology, ICMR-National JALMA Institute of Leprosy and Other Mycobacterial Diseases, Agra, India
                Author notes
                *Vishwa B. Unadkat, Consultant Physician &amp; Diabetologist, BAPS Shastriji Maharaj Hospital, Vadodara 390012 (India), vishw_u4u@yahoo.com
                Article
                510262 Dubai Diabetes Endocrinol J 2020;26:38–43
                10.1159/000510262
                16527aa2-de4e-4d31-bc54-f9dbf47d0a24
                © 2020 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

                This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 16 April 2020
                : 19 July 2020
                Page count
                Tables: 5, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Research Article

                Endocrinology & Diabetes,Neurology,Nutrition & Dietetics,Sexual medicine,Internal medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Screening of patients,Type 2 diabetes,Safety,SGLT2 inhibitor,Real world,Effectiveness

                Comments

                Comment on this article