0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Strategic use of observer-perspective questions in couples therapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Questions are one of the most frequently used strategies in therapy. There is a body of theoretical work on the kinds of questions that are preferred in specific treatment approaches. However, research on the use of questions in general, how they are formed and what specific therapeutic work they do, is relatively scarce in the literature. In this study, we use the conceptual framework and methods of conversation analysis (CA) to examine how systemic questions soliciting clients' perspective on the partners' thoughts and intents (Observer-Perspective Questions; OPQs) are realized interactively in actual clinical practice and the range of therapeutic work they perform in couples therapy. We identified 78 OPQs from archival data of videotaped time-limited couples therapies, a clinical population working with a professional therapist. From this set of 78 OPQs, five excerpts representing diverse use of OPQs were selected. These excerpts were transcribed in detail capturing not only the textual content but also the prosodic, gestural, and non-verbal aspects of these episodes. Using CA methodology, we identified four specific kinds of changes these questions can promote: progress toward relational optimism, support of positive aspects of the couple's relationship, promoting the concept that the couples' experiences and emotions are interlinked, and introducing new creative relational options. Detailed CA analyses of these clinical excerpts allowed us to identify how the OPQ sequences were built to realize these therapeutically useful moves using various conversational resources progressively and interactively. The conversational analysis of these sequences facilitated the exploration of relationships between the ways the questions are formed, timed, and delivered and the specific functions they perform to move the therapy forward. In conclusion, we make the general argument that examining important therapy events through a CA perspective provides a significant complementary vector to quantitative research on the therapy process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Sequence Organization in Interaction

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Lectures on Conversation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                31 August 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1229991
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University , Burnaby, BC, Canada
                [2] 2Department of Translation, Interpreting and Communication, Ghent University , Ghent, Belgium
                Author notes

                Edited by: Lisa Chiara Fellin, University of Bergamo, Italy

                Reviewed by: Stella Guarnieri, University of Bergamo, Italy; Jarl Wahlström, University of Jyväskylä, Finland

                *Correspondence: Peter Muntigl muntigl@ 123456sfu.ca

                †ORCID: Peter Muntigl orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-1948

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1229991
                10501453
                37720637
                168aa5c1-c103-4109-86b6-f30764b3871b
                Copyright © 2023 Muntigl and Horvath.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 May 2023
                : 24 July 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 65, Pages: 20, Words: 12704
                Funding
                This study was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant No. 435-2012-0302).
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Psychology for Clinical Settings

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                conversation analysis,epistemics,questions,reflexive questions,relationship,couples therapy,emotions

                Comments

                Comment on this article