21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      QSPR Modeling of Potentiometric Mg 2+ /Ca 2+ Selectivity for PVC‐plasticized Sensor Membranes

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles.

          It is expected that the number and variety of engineered nanoparticles will increase rapidly over the next few years, and there is a need for new methods to quickly test the potential toxicity of these materials. Because experimental evaluation of the safety of chemicals is expensive and time-consuming, computational methods have been found to be efficient alternatives for predicting the potential toxicity and environmental impact of new nanomaterials before mass production. Here, we show that the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) method commonly used to predict the physicochemical properties of chemical compounds can be applied to predict the toxicity of various metal oxides. Based on experimental testing, we have developed a model to describe the cytotoxicity of 17 different types of metal oxide nanoparticles to bacteria Escherichia coli. The model reliably predicts the toxicity of all considered compounds, and the methodology is expected to provide guidance for the future design of safe nanomaterials.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Computer Aided Drug Design: Success and Limitations.

            Over the last few decades, computer-aided drug design has emerged as a powerful technique playing a crucial role in the development of new drug molecules. Structure-based drug design and ligand-based drug design are two methods commonly used in computer-aided drug design. In this article, we discuss the theory behind both methods, as well as their successful applications and limitations. To accomplish this, we reviewed structure based and ligand based virtual screening processes. Molecular dynamics simulation, which has become one of the most influential tool for prediction of the conformation of small molecules and changes in their conformation within the biological target, has also been taken into account. Finally, we discuss the principles and concepts of molecular docking, pharmacophores and other methods used in computer-aided drug design.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Computational methods in developing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR): a review.

              Virtual filtering and screening of combinatorial libraries have recently gained attention as methods complementing the high-throughput screening and combinatorial chemistry. These chemoinformatic techniques rely heavily on quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis, a field with established methodology and successful history. In this review, we discuss the computational methods for building QSAR models. We start with outlining their usefulness in high-throughput screening and identifying the general scheme of a QSAR model. Following, we focus on the methodologies in constructing three main components of QSAR model, namely the methods for describing the molecular structure of compounds, for selection of informative descriptors and for activity prediction. We present both the well-established methods as well as techniques recently introduced into the QSAR domain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Electroanalysis
                Electroanalysis
                Wiley
                1040-0397
                1521-4109
                April 2020
                January 13 2020
                April 2020
                : 32
                : 4
                : 792-798
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of ChemistrySaint-Petersburg State University, Peterhof Universitetsky Prospect, 26 Saint-Petersburg 198504 Russia
                [2 ]A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and ElectrochemistryRussian Academy of Sciences Leninskiy Prosp., 31 119071 Moscow Russia
                [3 ]Laboratoire de Chémoinformatique, UMR 7140 CNRSUniversité de Strasbourg 4, rue Blaise Pascal 67000 Strasbourg France
                Article
                10.1002/elan.201900648
                170c3773-0f88-4368-8bae-d418f46bc9c1
                © 2020

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article