3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Grassland vertical height heterogeneity predicts flower and bee diversity: an UAV photogrammetric approach

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The ecosystem services offered by pollinators are vital for supporting agriculture and ecosystem functioning, with bees standing out as especially valuable contributors among these insects. Threats such as habitat fragmentation, intensive agriculture, and climate change are contributing to the decline of natural bee populations. Remote sensing could be a useful tool to identify sites of high diversity before investing into more expensive field survey. In this study, the ability of Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles (UAV) images to estimate biodiversity at a local scale has been assessed while testing the concept of the Height Variation Hypothesis (HVH). This hypothesis states that the higher the vegetation height heterogeneity (HH) measured by remote sensing information, the higher the vegetation vertical complexity and the associated species diversity. In this study, the concept has been further developed to understand if vegetation HH can also be considered a proxy for bee diversity and abundance. We tested this approach in 30 grasslands in the South of the Netherlands, where an intensive field data campaign (collection of flower and bee diversity and abundance) was carried out in 2021, along with a UAV campaign (collection of true color-RGB-images at high spatial resolution). Canopy Height Models (CHM) of the grasslands were derived using the photogrammetry technique “Structure from Motion” (SfM) with horizontal resolution (spatial) of 10 cm, 25 cm, and 50 cm. The accuracy of the CHM derived from UAV photogrammetry was assessed by comparing them through linear regression against local CHM LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) data derived from an Airborne Laser Scanner campaign completed in 2020/2021, yielding an \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$R^2$$\end{document} of 0.71. Subsequently, the HH assessed on the CHMs at the three spatial resolutions, using four different heterogeneity indices (Rao’s Q, Coefficient of Variation, Berger–Parker index, and Simpson’s D index), was correlated with the ground-based flower and bee diversity and bee abundance data. The Rao’s Q index was the most effective heterogeneity index, reaching high correlations with the ground-based data (0.44 for flower diversity, 0.47 for bee diversity, and 0.34 for bee abundance). Interestingly, the correlations were not significantly influenced by the spatial resolution of the CHM derived from UAV photogrammetry. Our results suggest that vegetation height heterogeneity can be used as a proxy for large-scale, standardized, and cost-effective inference of flower diversity and habitat quality for bees.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification.

          Ecosystem services are critical to human survival; in selected cases, maintaining these services provides a powerful argument for conserving biodiversity. Yet, the ecological and economic underpinnings of most services are poorly understood, impeding their conservation and management. For centuries, farmers have imported colonies of European honey bees (Apis mellifera) to fields and orchards for pollination services. These colonies are becoming increasingly scarce, however, because of diseases, pesticides, and other impacts. Native bee communities also provide pollination services, but the amount they provide and how this varies with land management practices are unknown. Here, we document the individual species and aggregate community contributions of native bees to crop pollination, on farms that varied both in their proximity to natural habitat and management type (organic versus conventional). On organic farms near natural habitat, we found that native bee communities could provide full pollination services even for a crop with heavy pollination requirements (e.g., watermelon, Citrullus lanatus), without the intervention of managed honey bees. All other farms, however, experienced greatly reduced diversity and abundance of native bees, resulting in insufficient pollination services from native bees alone. We found that diversity was essential for sustaining the service, because of year-to-year variation in community composition. Continued degradation of the agro-natural landscape will destroy this "free" service, but conservation and restoration of bee habitat are potentially viable economic alternatives for reducing dependence on managed honey bees.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                duccio.rocchini@unibo.it
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                8 January 2024
                8 January 2024
                2024
                : 14
                : 809
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bolzano/Bozen, ( https://ror.org/012ajp527) Piazza Universitá/Universitätsplatz 1, 39100 Bolzano/Bozen, Italy
                [2 ]BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, ( https://ror.org/01111rn36) via Irnerio 42, 40126 Bologna, Italy
                [3 ]Department of Spatial Sciences, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, ( https://ror.org/0415vcw02) Kamýcka 129, Praha - Suchdol, 16500 Czech Republic
                [4 ]GRID grid.4818.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0791 5666, Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, , Wageningen University, ; Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708PB The Netherlands
                [5 ]Remote Sensing Centre for Earth System Research (RSC4Earth), Leipzig University, ( https://ror.org/03s7gtk40) Leipzig, Germany
                [6 ]GRID grid.421064.5, ISNI 0000 0004 7470 3956, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, ; Leipzig, Germany
                [7 ]Department of Remote Sensing, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, ( https://ror.org/000h6jb29) Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
                [8 ]Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University and Research, ( https://ror.org/04qw24q55) P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [9 ]Eurac Research, Inst. for Alpine Environment, ( https://ror.org/01xt1w755) Bolzano, Italy
                [10 ]Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, ( https://ror.org/00wjc7c48) Milan, Italy
                [11 ]Visual art, FEIMC, Bolzano, Italy
                Article
                50308
                10.1038/s41598-023-50308-9
                10774354
                38191639
                1762936b-485e-416c-9dda-d676ccf92244
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 August 2023
                : 18 December 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Excellent Science (H2020 Priority Excellent Science)
                Award ID: 862480
                Award ID: 862480
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Excellent Science (H2020 Priority Excellent Science)
                Award ID: 862480
                Award ID: 862480
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2024

                Uncategorized
                biodiversity,environmental impact,ecosystem services,grassland ecology
                Uncategorized
                biodiversity, environmental impact, ecosystem services, grassland ecology

                Comments

                Comment on this article