9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phase II Randomized Trial of Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Belimumab for the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To assess the safety, mechanism of action, and preliminary efficacy of rituximab followed by belimumab in the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis (LN).

          Methods

          In a multicenter, randomized, open‐label clinical trial, 43 patients with recurrent or refractory LN were treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide (CYC), and glucocorticoids followed by weekly belimumab infusions until week 48 (RCB group), or treated with rituximab and CYC but no belimumab infusions (RC group). Patients were followed up until week 96. Percentages of total and autoreactive B cell subsets in the patients’ peripheral blood were analyzed by flow cytometry.

          Results

          Treatment with belimumab did not increase the incidence of adverse events in patients with refractory LN. At week 48, a complete or partial renal response occurred in 11 (52%) of 21 patients receiving belimumab, compared to 9 (41%) of 22 patients in the RC group who did not receive belimumab ( P = 0.452). Lack of improvement in or worsening of LN was the major reason for treatment failure. B cell depletion occurred in both groups, but the percentage of B cells remained lower in those receiving belimumab (geometric mean number of B cells at week 60, 53 cells/μl in the RCB group versus 11 cells/μl in the RC group; P = 0.0012). Percentages of total and autoreactive transitional B cells increased from baseline to week 48 in both groups. However, percentages of total and autoreactive naive B cells decreased from baseline to week 48 in the belimumab group compared to the no belimumab RC group ( P = 0.0349), a finding that is consistent with the observed impaired maturation of naive B cells and enhanced censoring of autoreactive B cells.

          Conclusion

          The addition of belimumab to a treatment regimen with rituximab and CYC was safe in patients with refractory LN. This regimen diminished maturation of transitional to naive B cells during B cell reconstitution, and enhanced the negative selection of autoreactive B cells. Clinical efficacy was not improved with rituximab and CYC in combination with belimumab when compared to a therapeutic strategy of B cell depletion alone in patients with LN.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.

          The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) group revised and validated the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria in order to improve clinical relevance, meet stringent methodology requirements, and incorporate new knowledge regarding the immunology of SLE. The classification criteria were derived from a set of 702 expert-rated patient scenarios. Recursive partitioning was used to derive an initial rule that was simplified and refined based on SLICC physician consensus. The SLICC group validated the classification criteria in a new validation sample of 690 new expert-rated patient scenarios. Seventeen criteria were identified. In the derivation set, the SLICC classification criteria resulted in fewer misclassifications compared with the current ACR classification criteria (49 versus 70; P = 0.0082) and had greater sensitivity (94% versus 86%; P < 0.0001) and equal specificity (92% versus 93%; P = 0.39). In the validation set, the SLICC classification criteria resulted in fewer misclassifications compared with the current ACR classification criteria (62 versus 74; P = 0.24) and had greater sensitivity (97% versus 83%; P < 0.0001) but lower specificity (84% versus 96%; P < 0.0001). The new SLICC classification criteria performed well in a large set of patient scenarios rated by experts. According to the SLICC rule for the classification of SLE, the patient must satisfy at least 4 criteria, including at least one clinical criterion and one immunologic criterion OR the patient must have biopsy-proven lupus nephritis in the presence of antinuclear antibodies or anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis.

            Recent studies have suggested that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may offer advantages over intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) for the treatment of lupus nephritis, but these therapies have not been compared in an international randomized, controlled trial. Here, we report the comparison of MMF and IVC as induction treatment for active lupus nephritis in a multinational, two-phase (induction and maintenance) study. We randomly assigned 370 patients with classes III through V lupus nephritis to open-label MMF (target dosage 3 g/d) or IVC (0.5 to 1.0 g/m(2) in monthly pulses) in a 24-wk induction study. Both groups received prednisone, tapered from a maximum starting dosage of 60 mg/d. The primary end point was a prespecified decrease in urine protein/creatinine ratio and stabilization or improvement in serum creatinine. Secondary end points included complete renal remission, systemic disease activity and damage, and safety. Overall, we did not detect a significantly different response rate between the two groups: 104 (56.2%) of 185 patients responded to MMF compared with 98 (53.0%) of 185 to IVC. Secondary end points were also similar between treatment groups. There were nine deaths in the MMF group and five in the IVC group. We did not detect significant differences between the MMF and IVC groups with regard to rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, or infections. Although most patients in both treatment groups experienced clinical improvement, the study did not meet its primary objective of showing that MMF was superior to IVC as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis: the Lupus Nephritis Assessment with Rituximab study.

              To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial in patients with lupus nephritis treated concomitantly with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids. Patients (n = 144) with class III or class IV lupus nephritis were randomized 1:1 to receive rituximab (1,000 mg) or placebo on days 1, 15, 168, and 182. The primary end point was renal response status at week 52. Rituximab depleted peripheral CD19+ B cells in 71 of 72 patients. The overall (complete and partial) renal response rates were 45.8% among the 72 patients receiving placebo and 56.9% among the 72 patients receiving rituximab (P = 0.18); partial responses accounted for most of the difference. The primary end point (superior response rate with rituximab) was not achieved. Eight placebo-treated patients and no rituximab-treated patients required cyclophosphamide rescue therapy through week 52. Statistically significant improvements in serum complement C3, C4, and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels were observed among patients treated with rituximab. In both treatment groups, a reduction in anti-dsDNA levels greater than the median reduction was associated with reduced proteinuria. The rates of serious adverse events, including infections, were similar in both groups. Neutropenia, leukopenia, and hypotension occurred more frequently in the rituximab group. Although rituximab therapy led to more responders and greater reductions in anti-dsDNA and C3/C4 levels, it did not improve clinical outcomes after 1 year of treatment. The combination of rituximab with MMF and corticosteroids did not result in any new or unexpected safety signals. Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bdiamond@northwell.edu
                Journal
                Arthritis Rheumatol
                Arthritis Rheumatol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2326-5205
                ART
                Arthritis & Rheumatology (Hoboken, N.j.)
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2326-5191
                2326-5205
                01 December 2020
                January 2021
                : 73
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/art.v73.1 )
                : 121-131
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Feinstein Institute for Medical Research Manhasset New York
                [ 2 ] Immune Tolerance Network Bethesda Maryland
                [ 3 ] Rho Durham North Carolina
                [ 4 ] National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases NIH Bethesda Maryland
                [ 5 ] Columbia University Medical Center New York New York
                [ 6 ] University of Colorado Denver
                [ 7 ] University of Alabama at Birmingham San Francisco
                [ 8 ] Medical University of South Carolina Charleston
                [ 9 ] UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
                [ 10 ] Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York
                [ 11 ] Emory University Atlanta Georgia
                [ 12 ] Medical Center of Aurora Aurora Colorado
                [ 13 ] University of California Los Angeles
                [ 14 ] Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio
                [ 15 ] University of North Carolina Kidney Center Chapel Hill
                [ 16 ] NYU School of Medicine New York New York
                [ 17 ] University of California San Francisco
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Address correspondence to Betty Diamond, MD, Feinstein Institute, North Shore Hospital, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030. Email: bdiamond@ 123456northwell.edu .

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9005-1690
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2361-0787
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8350-3428
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3250-3804
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8440-8702
                Article
                ART41466
                10.1002/art.41466
                7839443
                32755035
                179ec468-c491-466a-bc2a-7d3458b7f163
                © 2020 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 02 March 2020
                : 22 July 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 11, Words: 9627
                Funding
                Funded by: Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100006492;
                Award ID: 1UM1AI09565
                Categories
                Full Length
                Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.6 mode:remove_FC converted:27.01.2021

                Comments

                Comment on this article