21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Three-year results from the Retro-IDEAL study: Real-world data from diabetic macular edema (DME) patients treated with ILUVIEN ® (0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide implant)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          The Retro-IDEAL (ILUVIEN Implant for chronic DiabEtic MAcuLar edema) study is a retrospective study designed to assess real-world outcomes achieved with the ILUVIEN® (0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc)) in patients with chronic diabetic macular edema (DME) in clinical practices in Germany.

          Methods:

          This study was conducted across 16 sites in Germany and involved 81 eyes (63 patients) with persistent or recurrent DME and a prior suboptimal response to a first-line intravitreal therapy (primarily anti-VEGF intravitreal therapies).

          Results:

          Patients were followed-up for 30.8 ± 11.3 months (mean ± standard deviation) and had a mean age of 68.0 ± 10.4 years. Best-recorded visual acuity (BRVA) improved by +5.5 letters at month 9 (P ⩽ 0.005, n=56; from a baseline of 49 letters) and this was maintained through to month 30 (P ⩽ 0.05, n = 42). There was a concurrent improvement in central macular thickness with a reduction from 502 µm at baseline to 338 µm at year 1 (P ⩽ 0.0001, n = 43). This effect was sustained to year 3 (i.e. 318 µm; P ⩽ 0.0001, n = 29). Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) remained constant between baseline and year 3 with a peak change of 1.9 mm Hg occurring at year 1. Elevated IOP was observed in a similar percentage of patients prior to (22.2% of cases) and following (27.2%) treatment with the FAc implant. In the majority of cases, these elevations were managed effectively with IOP medications.

          Conclusions:

          Despite substantial amounts of prior intravitreal treatments – primarily with anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs – this real-world study showed that sustained structural and functional improvements can last for up to 3 years with a single FAc implant.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Novel method for analyzing snellen visual acuity measurements.

          Most retrospective reviews convert Snellen visual acuity measurements obtained during routine clinic visits to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units so that statistical manipulations can be performed. However, visual acuity measurements expressed as logMAR units are not intuitively interpretable by clinicians. A more intuitive approach is presented here which uses the conversion of Snellen visual acuity fractions to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter scores for statistical manipulations. Snellen visual acuity measurements were converted to approximate ETDRS (approxETDRS) letter scores for statistical manipulations and then converted back to Snellen equivalent fractions. The formula to convert Snellen visual acuity measurements to approxETDRS letter scores is 85 + 50 x log (Snellen fraction), which may be rounded to the nearest letter. A linear relationship exists between true ETDRS letter scores, approxETDRS letter scores, and logMAR units. The interconversion between Snellen visual acuity measurements, logMAR units, and approxETDRS letter scores was prepared in a tabular form for easy reference. The same outcomes (in Snellen fractions) were obtained with statistical manipulation of either approxETDRS letter scores or logMAR conversions. Conversion of Snellen visual acuity fractions to approxETDRS letter scores for the purpose of performing statistical manipulations provides more readily interpretable outcomes compared with the current strategy of converting Snellen visual acuity fractions to logMAR units.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevention of leukostasis and vascular leakage in streptozotocin-induced diabetic retinopathy via intercellular adhesion molecule-1 inhibition.

            Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of adult vision loss and blindness. Much of the retinal damage that characterizes the disease results from retinal vascular leakage and nonperfusion. This study shows that diabetic retinal vascular leakage and nonperfusion are temporally and spatially associated with retinal leukocyte stasis (leukostasis) in the rat model of streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Retinal leukostasis increases within days of developing diabetes and correlates with the increased expression of retinal intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). ICAM-1 blockade with a mAb prevents diabetic retinal leukostasis and vascular leakage by 48.5% and 85.6%, respectively. These data identify the causal role of leukocytes in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy and establish the potential utility of ICAM-1 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for the prevention of diabetic retinopathy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Long-term benefit of sustained-delivery fluocinolone acetonide vitreous inserts for diabetic macular edema.

              To assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreal inserts releasing 0.2 μg/day (low dose) or 0.5 μg/day (high dose) fluocinolone acetonide (FA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Two parallel, prospective, randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trials. Subjects with persistent DME despite at least 1 macular laser treatment were randomized 1:2:2 to sham injection (n = 185), low-dose insert (n = 375), or high-dose insert (n = 393). Subjects received study drug or sham injection at baseline and after 6 weeks were eligible for rescue laser. Based on retreatment criteria, additional study drug or sham injections could be given after 1 year. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with improvement from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Trial (ETDRS) letter score of 15 or more at month 24. Secondary outcomes included other parameters of visual function and foveal thickness (FTH). The percentage of patients with improvement from baseline ETDRS letter score of 15 or more at month 24 was 28.7 and 28.6 in the low- and high-dose insert groups, respectively, compared with 16.2 in the sham group (P = 0.002 for each). Benefit occurred for both doses compared with sham at 3 weeks and all subsequent time points. The mean improvement in BCVA letter score between baseline and month 24 was 4.4 and 5.4 in the low- and high-dose groups, respectively, compared with 1.7 in the sham group (P = 0.02 and P = 0.016). At all time points compared with sham, there was significantly more improvement in FTH. Subjects requiring cataract surgery were more frequent in the insert groups, and their visual benefit was similar to that of subjects who were pseudophakic at baseline. Glaucoma requiring incisional surgery occurred in 3.7%, 7.6%, and 0.5% of the low-dose, high-dose, and sham groups, respectively. Both low- and high-dose FA inserts significantly improved BCVA in patients with DME over 2 years, and the risk-to-benefit ratio was superior for the low-dose insert. This is the first pharmacologic treatment that can be administered by an outpatient injection to provide substantial benefit in patients with DME for at least 2 years. Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur J Ophthalmol
                Eur J Ophthalmol
                EJO
                spejo
                European Journal of Ophthalmology
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1120-6721
                1724-6016
                18 March 2019
                March 2020
                : 30
                : 2
                : 382-391
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Augenklinik, Department of Ophthalmology, Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
                [2 ]Augenklinik Universitätsallee, Bremen, Germany
                [3 ]Augenklinik Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany
                [4 ]Universitäts-Augenklinik Bonn, Bonn, Germany
                [5 ]Universitäts-Augenklinik Dresden, Germany
                [6 ]Augenzentrum Lüdenscheid, Germany
                [7 ]Universitäts-Augenklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
                [8 ]MVZ Augenzentrum, München, Germany
                [9 ]Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
                [10 ]Universitäts-Augenklinik Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
                [11 ]Universitäts-Augenklinik, Marburg, Germany
                [12 ]Universitäts-Augenklinik des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
                [13 ]Makula Zentrum, Institut für Augenheilkunde Halle, Halle, Germany
                [14 ]Augenklinik am Glacis, Torgau, Germany
                [15 ]Augenklinik, Dietrich-Bonhoeffer-Klinikum, Neubrandenburg, Germany
                [16 ]Augenpraxisklinik Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
                Author notes
                [*]Albert J Augustin, Augenklinik, Department of Ophthalmology, Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe 76133, Germany. Email: albertjaugustin@ 123456googlemail.com
                Article
                10.1177_1120672119834474
                10.1177/1120672119834474
                7079293
                30884972
                17bbc8eb-bd7e-451e-9c8f-138b6ab90ef2
                © The Author(s) 2019

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 4 October 2018
                : 7 February 2019
                Categories
                Original Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                steroid,iluvien,dme,microdosing,retro-ideal,3 years
                steroid, iluvien, dme, microdosing, retro-ideal, 3 years

                Comments

                Comment on this article