123
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      吉西他滨调整方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的Ⅱ期临床试验 Translated title: Phase Ⅱ Trial of Improved Regimen with Gemcitabine in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          背景与目的

          吉西他滨与铂类的联合化疗是晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)最常用的治疗方案。通常3周方案中的吉西他滨需间隔1周给药。为提高依从性,本研究将吉西他滨第8天给药时间调整为第5天,并评价调整方案一线治疗晚期NSCLC的疗效及安全性。

          方法

          2007年10月-2009年10月共入组83例晚期NSCLC患者,采用吉西他滨1, 000 mg/m 2-1, 250 mg/m 2第1天、第5天静脉滴注30 min,联合顺铂75 mg/m 2,或联合卡铂(AUC=5)第1天静滴,每21天为1周期,每例至少完成2周期治疗后评价疗效,观察毒性反应及无进展生存期和总生存期。

          结果

          83例患者的客观有效率为37.3%,中位无进展生存期和中位生存期分别为6.1个月和15.0个月,1年、2年生存率分别为57.8%与16.2%。调整方案的主要不良反应为血液学毒性与胃肠道反应,Ⅲ度-Ⅳ度白细胞、血红蛋白、血小板减少发生率分别为26.5%、10.8%、7.2%,联合顺铂治疗组Ⅲ度-Ⅳ度胃肠道反应发生率为27.5%。无治疗相关死亡。

          结论

          吉西他滨联合铂类5天调整方案一线治疗晚期NSCLC疗效肯定,毒副反应可耐受,值得进一步开展随机对照研究。

          Translated abstract

          Background and objective

          Gemcitabine-platinum-combined with chemotherapy is the most common treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gemcitabine is administered once a week in a general three-week schedule. In the present study, gemcitabine is administered on d1 and d5 to improve compliance, and the efficacy and safety of the improved regimen is evaluated in untreated patients with advanced NSCLC.

          Methods

          A total of 83 patients were enrolled between October 2007 and October 2009. In each cycle, gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1, 000 mg/m 2-1, 250 mg/m 2 via a 30 min intravenous infusion on d1 and d5 followed by cisplatin at a dose of 75 mg/m 2 or carboplatin (AUC=5) on d1 every three weeks. At least two cycles of chemotherapy were completed in each case, and clinical response and toxicity of the regimen were observed.

          Results

          The objective response rate was 37.3%. The median progression free survival and overall survival time were 6.1 months and 15.0 months, respectively. The one-year and two-year survival rates were 57.8% and 16.2%, respectively. Myelosuppression and gastrointestinal responses were the main toxicities. The incidence of grade 3/4 of leucopenia, hypohemia, and thrombocytopenia were 26.5%, 10.8% and 7.2%, respectively. A total of 27.5% of the patients in the cisplatin group had grade 3/4 gastrointestinal responses. Treatment related deaths were not observed in this study.

          Conclusion

          The regimen is active and well-tolerated in untreated patients with advanced NSCLC. Further randomized controlled studies are necessary.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Systemic chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: recent advances and future directions.

          Systemic therapy improves the survival and quality of life of patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several new therapeutic options have emerged for advanced NSCLC, incorporating novel cytotoxic agents (taxanes, gemcitabine, pemetrexed) and molecular-targeted agents (erlotinib, bevacizumab). Efforts to improve the outcome of first-line therapy for advanced and metastatic NSCLC have primarily focused on the addition of targeted agents to platinum-based two-drug regimens. Bevacizumab, an antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, is the first drug to demonstrate superior outcomes when added to systemic chemotherapy in advanced disease. Evaluation of the role of maintenance therapy following four to six cycles of first-line combination chemotherapy is ongoing. Both cytotoxic agents and targeted agents are suitable for evaluation in the maintenance setting. Promising results have been noted with single-agent paclitaxel as maintenance therapy following four cycles of combination therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Phase III studies are now under way to evaluate the roles of gemcitabine, pemetrexed, and erlotinib as maintenance therapies for patients who experience a response or disease stabilization after four cycles of combination chemotherapy. Whether this approach will be successful in extending the survival of a select group of patients remains to be seen.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phase III randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

            To evaluate whether two commonly used newer platinum-based regimens offer any advantage over vinorelbine-cisplatin (reference regimen) in response rate for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 2 every 21 days (GC arm), or paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) (3-hour infusion) then carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg/mL x min), both on day 1 every 21 days (PCb arm), or vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2)/wk for 12 weeks then every other week plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) day 1 every 28 days (VC arm). Six hundred twelve patients were randomized to treatment (205 GC, 204 PCb, and 203 VC). Overall response rates for the GC (30%) and PCb (32%) arms were not significantly different from that of the VC arm (30%). There were no differences in overall survival, time to disease progression, or time to treatment failure. Median survival for the GC, PCb, and VC groups was 9.8, 9.9, and 9.5 months, respectively. Neutropenia was significantly higher on the VC arm (GC 17% or PCb 35% v VC 43% of cycles, P <.001), as was thrombocytopenia on the GC arm (GC 16% v VC 0.1% of cycles, P <.001). Alopecia and peripheral neurotoxicity were most common on the PCb arm, as was nausea/vomiting on the VC arm (P <.05). Efficacy end points were not significantly different between experimental and reference arms, although toxicities showed differences. These findings suggest that chemotherapy in NSCLC has reached a therapeutic plateau.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine.

              A novel deoxycytidine analog, gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine [dFdC]), has been studied in a phase I clinical and pharmacology trial. Doses ranging from 10 to 1,000 mg/m2 were administered over 30 minutes weekly times 3 weeks every 4 weeks. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was 790 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, with thrombocytopenia and anemia quantitatively more important than granulocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was minimal. Two responses in patients with adenocarcinomas of the colon and lung were documented. The maximum dFdC plasma concentration, reached after 15 minutes of infusion, was proportional to the total dose administered. Elimination, due mainly to deamination, was rapid (terminal half-life [t1/2], 8.0 minutes) and dose independent. The deamination product 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU) was eliminated with biphasic kinetics characterized by a long terminal phase (t1/2, 14 hours); it was the sole metabolite detected in urine. The concentration of dFdC 5'-triphosphate in circulating mononuclear cells increased in proportion to the dFdC dose at infusions between 35 and 250 mg/m2. No further increment in dFdC 5'-triphosphate (dFdCTP) was observed at higher doses, which resulted in plasma dFdC concentrations greater than 20 mumol/L (350 to 1,000 mg/m2), suggesting saturation of dFdC 5'-phosphate accumulation. The recommended dose for phase II clinical trials in solid tumors is 790 mg/m2/wk.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi
                Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi
                ZGFAZZ
                Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
                中国肺癌杂志编辑部 (天津市和平区南京路228号300020 )
                1009-3419
                1999-6187
                20 January 2012
                : 15
                : 1
                : 1-5
                Affiliations
                [ ] 310022 杭州,浙江省肿瘤医院化疗中心 Chemotherapy Center, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
                Author notes
                范云, Yun FAN, E-mail: fanyun@ 123456csco.org.cn
                Article
                zgfazz-15-1-1 R734.2
                10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2012.01.01
                5999965
                22237116
                17dde86d-cc69-4aa1-92c5-99dbd602e3d2
                版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2012Copyright ©2012 Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer. All rights reserved.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

                History
                : 12 August 2011
                : 15 November 2011
                Funding
                Funded by: 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目
                Award ID: 2008B027
                Funded by: the grant from Medicine and Health Technology Program of Zhejiang Province
                Award ID: 2008B027
                本研究受浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(No.2008B027)资助
                This study was supported by the grant from Medicine and Health Technology Program of Zhejiang Province (to Yun FAN)(No.2008B027)
                Categories
                临床研究
                Basic Research

                肺肿瘤,吉西他滨,联合方案,lung neoplasms,gemcitabine,combined chemotherapy regimens

                Comments

                Comment on this article