20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK Household Longitudinal Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vaccine hesitancy could undermine efforts to control COVID-19. We investigated the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK and identified vaccine hesitant subgroups. The ‘Understanding Society’ COVID-19 survey asked participants (n=12,035) their likelihood of vaccine uptake and reason for hesitancy. Cross-sectional analysis assessed vaccine hesitancy prevalence and logistic regression calculated odds ratios. Overall vaccine hesitancy was low (18% unlikely/very unlikely). Vaccine hesitancy was higher in women (21.0% vs 14.7%), younger age groups (26.5% in 16-24 year olds vs 4.5% in 75+) and those with lower education levels (18.6% no qualifications vs 13.2% degree qualified). Vaccine hesitancy was high in Black (71.8%) and Pakistani/Bangladeshi (42.3%) ethnic groups. Odds ratios for vaccine hesitancy were 13.42 (95% CI:6.86, 26.24) in Black and 2.54 (95% CI:1.19, 5.44) in Pakistani/Bangladeshi groups (compared to White British/Irish) and 3.54 (95%CI:2.06, 6.09) for people with no qualifications versus degree. Urgent action to address hesitancy is needed for some but not all ethnic minority groups.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Brain Behav Immun
          Brain Behav Immun
          Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
          The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
          0889-1591
          1090-2139
          11 March 2021
          11 March 2021
          Affiliations
          [a ]MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK
          [b ]Understanding Society, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, UK
          [c ]Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
          [d ]Ipsos MORI UK Ltd, UK
          [e ]Public Health Scotland, UK
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding Author at: MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Berkeley Square, 99 Berkeley Street, Glasgow, G3 7HR, UK
          [1]

          equal contribution

          Article
          S0889-1591(21)00110-0
          10.1016/j.bbi.2021.03.008
          7946541
          33713824
          17f04799-13f4-4839-b7e9-1b3e67d0c34c
          © 2021 The Author(s)

          Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

          History
          : 15 January 2021
          : 4 March 2021
          : 6 March 2021
          Categories
          Article

          Neurosciences
          covid-19,vaccine hesitancy,vaccine uptake,ethnicity,socioeconomic position,inequalities
          Neurosciences
          covid-19, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine uptake, ethnicity, socioeconomic position, inequalities

          Comments

          Comment on this article