4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effect of COVID-19 restrictions on rehabilitation and functional outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty during the first wave of the pandemic

      research-article
      , BA, CQP MCQI 1 , 2 , , MD, PhD, FRCS Ed (Tr & Orth) 1 , , FRCS (Tr & Orth) 1 , 2 , , MD, MSc, FRCS Ed (Tr & Orth) 1 , 2
      Bone & Joint Open
      The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
      COVID-19, Total joint replacement, Rehabilitation, Physical health, Mental health, Anxiety, Depression

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          The primary aim was to assess the patient-perceived effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 on rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondary aims were to assess perceived restrictions, influence on mental health, and functional outcome compared to patients undergoing surgery without restriction.

          Methods

          During February and March 2020, 105 patients underwent THA (n = 48) or TKA (n = 57) and completed preoperative and six-month postoperative assessments. A cohort of 415 patients undergoing surgery in 2019 were used as the control. Patient demographic data, BMI, comorbidities, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) or Knee Score (OKS), and EuroQoL five-domain (EQ-5D) score were collected preoperatively and at six months postoperatively. At six months postoperatively, the 2020 patients were also asked to complete a questionnaire relating to the effect of the social restrictions on their outcome and their mental health.

          Results

          Nearly half of the patients (47.6%, n = 50/105) felt that the restrictions imposed by COVID-19 had limited their rehabilitation and were associated with a significantly worse postoperative OKS (p < 0.001), EQ-5D score (p < 0.001), and lower satisfaction rate (p = 0.019). The reasons for the perceived limited rehabilitation were: being unable to exercise (n = 32, 64%), limited access to physiotherapy (n = 30, 60%), and no face-to-face follow-up (n = 30, 60%). A quarter (n = 26) felt that their mental health had deteriorated postoperatively; 17.1% (n = 18) felt depressed and 26.7% (n = 28) felt anxious. Joint-specific scores and satisfaction for the 2020 group were no different to the 2019 group, however patients undergoing THA in 2020 had a significantly worse postoperative EQ-5D compared to the 2019 cohort (difference 0.106; p = 0.001) which was not observed in patients undergoing TKA.

          Conclusion

          Half of the 2020 cohort felt that their rehabilitation had been limited and was associated with worse postoperative Oxford and EQ-5D scores, and lower rates of patient satisfaction, but relative to the 2019 cohort their overall outcomes were no different, with the exception of THA patients who had a worse general health score.

          Level of evidence: Prospective study, Level 2

          Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(6):380–387.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          EuroQol: the current state of play.

          R. Brooks (1996)
          The EuroQol Group first met in 1987 to test the feasibility of jointly developing a standardised non-disease-specific instrument for describing and valuing health-related quality of life. From the outset the Group has been multi-country, multi-centre, and multi-disciplinary. The EuroQol instrument is intended to complement other forms of quality of life measures, and it has been purposefully developed to generate a cardinal index of health, thus giving it considerable potential for use in economic evaluation. Considerable effort has been invested by the Group in the development and valuation aspects of health status measurement. Earlier work was reported upon in 1990; this paper is a second 'corporate' effort detailing subsequent developments. The concepts underlying the EuroQol framework are explored with particular reference to the generic nature of the instrument. The valuation task is reviewed and some evidence on the methodological requirements for measurement is presented. A number of special issues of considerable interest and concern to the Group are discussed: the modelling of data, the duration of health states and the problems surrounding the state 'dead'. An outline of some of the applications of the EuroQol instrument is presented and a brief commentary on the Group's ongoing programme of work concludes the paper.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

            The Oxford hip and knee scores have been extensively used since they were first described in 1996 and 1998. During this time, they have been modified and used for many different purposes. This paper describes how they should be used and seeks to clarify areas of confusion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future

              Over the period 1987–1991 an inter-disciplinary five-country group developed the EuroQol instrument, a five-dimensional three-level generic measure subsequently termed the ‘EQ-5D’. It was designed to measure and value health status. The salient features of its development and its consolidation and expansion are discussed. Initial expansion came, in particular, in the form of new language versions. Their development raised translation and semantic issues, experience with which helped feed into the design of two further instruments, the EQ-5D-5L and the youth version EQ-5D-Y. The expanded usage across clinical programmes, disease and condition areas, population surveys, patient-reported outcomes, and value sets is outlined. Valuation has been of continued relevance for the Group as this has allowed its instruments to be utilised as part of the economic appraisal of health programmes and their incorporation into health technology assessments. The future of the Group is considered in the context of: (1) its scientific strategy, (2) changes in the external environment affecting the demand for EQ-5D, and (3) a variety of issues it is facing in the context of the design of the instrument, its use in health technology assessment, and potential new uses for EQ-5D outside of clinical trials and technology appraisal. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Research Database Manager
                Role: Orthopaedic Consultant
                Role: Professor of Orthopaedics
                Role: Orthopaedic Consultant, Honorary Senior Clinical Lecturer
                Journal
                Bone Jt Open
                Bone Jt Open
                BJO
                Bone & Joint Open
                The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery (London )
                2633-1462
                18 June 2021
                June 2021
                : 2
                : 6
                : 380-387
                Affiliations
                [1 ] org-divisionDepartment of Orthopaedics , org-divisionThe Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, UK
                [2 ] org-divisionOrthopaedics Department , org-divisionUniversity of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be sent to Deborah J. MacDonald. E-mail: deborah.macdonald@ 123456ed.ac.uk
                Article
                BJO-2-380
                10.1302/2633-1462.26.BJO-2021-0004.R1
                8244798
                34139876
                180fe577-c738-4d55-9055-89a2df613191
                © 2021 Author(s) et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                Categories
                Arthroplasty
                Return to Work
                Activity Level
                Revision Knee Arthroplasty
                Revision Hip Arthroplasty
                Custom metadata
                Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
                Arthroplasty
                C. E. H. Scott reports board membership on Bone & Joint Journal and Bone & Joint Research, consultancy payments from Stryker and Pfizer, and an institutional grant from Stryker, all unrelated to this article.

                covid-19,total joint replacement,rehabilitation,physical health,mental health,anxiety,depression

                Comments

                Comment on this article