8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on image quality in novel digital PET/CT: clinical implications for the assessment of lung tumors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare PET image reconstruction algorithms on novel digital silicon photomultiplier PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed and histopathologically confirmed lung cancer. A total of 45 patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT for initial lung cancer staging were included. PET images were reconstructed using ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) with time-of-flight and point spread function modelling as well as Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (BSREM) with different β-values yielding a total of 7 datasets per patient. Subjective and objective image assessment with all image datasets was carried out, including subgroup analyses for patients with high dose (> 2.0 MBq/kg) and low dose (≤ 2.0 MBq/kg) of 18F-FDG injection regimen.

          Results

          Subjective image quality ratings were significantly different among all different reconstruction algorithms as well as among BSREM using different β-values only (both p < 0.001). BSREM with a β-value of 600 was assigned the highest score for general image quality, image sharpness, and lesion conspicuity. BSREM reconstructions resulted in higher SUV max of lung tumors compared to OSEM of up to + 28.0% ( p < 0.001). BSREM reconstruction resulted in higher signal-/ and contrast-to-background ratios of lung tumor and higher signal-/ and contrast-to-noise ratio compared to OSEM up to a β-value of 800. Lower β-values (BSREM 450) resulted in the best image quality for high dose 18F-FDG injections, whereas higher β-values (BSREM 600) lead to the best image quality in low dose 18F-FDG PET/CT ( p < 0.05).

          Conclusions

          BSREM reconstruction algorithm used in digital detector PET leads to significant increases of lung tumor SUV max, signal-to-background ratio, and signal-to-noise ratio, which translates into a higher image quality, tumor conspicuity, and image sharpness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography.

          Determining the stage of non-small-cell lung cancer often requires multiple preoperative tests and invasive procedures. Whole-body positron-emission tomography (PET) may simplify and improve the evaluation of patients with this tumor. We prospectively compared the ability of a standard approach to staging (computed tomography [CT], ultrasonography, bone scanning, and, when indicated, needle biopsies) and one involving PET to detect metastases in mediastinal lymph nodes and at distant sites in 102 patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. The presence of mediastinal metastatic disease was confirmed histopathologically. Distant metastases that were detected by PET were further evaluated by standard imaging tests and biopsies. Patients were followed postoperatively for six months by standard methods to detect occult metastases. Logistic-regression analysis was used to evaluate the ability of PET and CT to identify malignant mediastinal lymph nodes. The sensitivity and specificity of PET for the detection of mediastinal metastases were 91 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 81 to 100 percent) and 86 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 78 to 94 percent), respectively. The corresponding values for CT were 75 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 60 to 90 percent) and 66 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 55 to 77 percent). When the results of PET and CT were adjusted for each other, only PET results were positively correlated with the histopathological findings in mediastinal lymph nodes (P<0.001). PET identified distant metastases that had not been found by standard methods in 11 of 102 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of PET for the detection of both mediastinal and distant metastatic disease were 95 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 88 to 100 percent) and 83 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 74 to 92 percent), respectively. The use of PET to identify the stage of the disease resulted in a different stage from the one determined by standard methods in 62 patients: the stage was lowered in 20 and raised in 42. PET improves the rate of detection of local and distant metastases in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Novel penalised likelihood reconstruction of PET in the assessment of histologically verified small pulmonary nodules

            Objectives Investigate the effect of a novel Bayesian penalised likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm on analysis of pulmonary nodules examined with 18F-FDG PET/CT, and to determine its effect on small, sub-10-mm nodules. Methods 18F-FDG PET/CTs performed for nodule evaluation in 104 patients (121 nodules) were retrospectively reconstructed using the new algorithm, and compared to time-of-flight ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) reconstruction. Nodule and background parameters were analysed semi-quantitatively and visually. Results BPL compared to OSEM resulted in statistically significant increases in nodule SUVmax (mean 5.3 to 8.1, p  10 mm (n = 90, mean 42 %) (p = 0.025). Increase in signal-to-noise was higher in nodules ≤10 mm (224 %, mean 12 to 27) compared to >10 mm (165 %, mean 28 to 46). When applying optimum SUVmax thresholds for detecting malignancy, the sensitivity and accuracy increased using BPL, with the greatest improvements in nodules ≤10 mm. Conclusion BPL results in a significant increase in signal-to-background and signal-to-noise compared to OSEM. When semi-quantitative analyses to diagnose malignancy are applied, higher SUVmax thresholds may be warranted owing to the SUVmax increase compared to OSEM. Key Points • Novel Bayesian penalised likelihood PET reconstruction was applied for lung nodule evaluation. • This was compared to current standard of care OSEM reconstruction. • The novel reconstruction generated significant increases in lung nodule signal-to-background and signal-to-noise. • These increases were highest in small, sub-10-mm pulmonary nodules. • Higher SUV max thresholds may be warranted when using semi-quantitative analyses to diagnose malignancy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Design Features and Mutual Compatibility Studies of the Time-of-Flight PET Capable GE SIGNA PET/MR System

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +41-44-255 18 18 , michael.messerli@usz.ch
                Journal
                EJNMMI Phys
                EJNMMI Phys
                EJNMMI Physics
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2197-7364
                26 September 2018
                26 September 2018
                December 2018
                : 5
                : 27
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
                [2 ]Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich/University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
                [3 ]GE Medical Systems (Schweiz) AG, Glattbrugg, Switzerland
                Article
                223
                10.1186/s40658-018-0223-x
                6156690
                30255439
                182bdc03-52a8-4fbf-be19-a6670ffb0d38
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 9 April 2018
                : 29 July 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006775, GE Healthcare;
                Award ID: Institutional grants from GE Healthcare (unrelated to current study)
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                positron-emission tomography,lung cancer,image reconstruction,pet/ct,image quality enhancement

                Comments

                Comment on this article