4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Quantifying Range of Motion and Stress Patterns at the Transitional Lumbosacral Junction: Pilot Study Using a Computational Model for Load-Bearing at Accessory L5-S1 Articulation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Symptomatic or asymptomatic transitional anomalies at the lumbosacral junction are common occurrences in the population. Lumbosacral (L5-S1) accessory articulations are the most common presentations of transitional anomalies at this region. Such anatomical alterations are believed to be associated with biomechanical changes of load-bearing and movement restrictions leading to low back pain. This study attempts to use computational models of a normal and a lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) accessory articulation to analyze and compare the range of motion and loading patterns at the lumbosacral articulations.

          Methods

          Three-dimensional Finite Element computational models of normal and accessory L5-S1 articulated sacrum were created. These models were tested for range of motion and stress patterns generated at the lumbosacral articulations using similar loading and motion simulation to elicit different moments/excursions at the lumbosacral junctions.

          Results

          Compared to the normal variant, the transitional model exhibited different range of motion and divergent patterns of stress generation at the lumbosacral and accessory articulations with equal and physiological magnitudes of loading applied to both the models.

          Conclusions

          The finite element modeling approach can be used for biomechanical investigations in LSTV variants. However, larger sample studies with different LSTV models may be required to statistically compare movement and loading patterns at LSTV-affected lumbosacral and sacroiliac junctions, and to recommend definitive treatment strategies in these situations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Int J Spine Surg
          ijss
          Int J Spine Surg
          International Journal of Spine Surgery
          International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery
          2211-4599
          22 February 2019
          February 2019
          : 13
          : 1
          : 17-23
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of The West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
          [2 ]Ohio Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute (OMNI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio
          [3 ]School of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu, India
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Niladri Kumar Mahato, MBBS, MS, DNB, PhD, Senior-Lecturer, Department of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of The West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago. Phone: (868) 372-6894; Fax: (868) 662-9148; Email: niladri.mahato@ 123456sta.uwi.edu .

          Disclosures and COI: The authors received no funding for this study and report no conflicts of interest.

          Article
          PMC6383456 PMC6383456 6383456 ijss-13-01-02
          10.14444/6002
          6383456
          30805281
          193066b3-b58f-4ef7-8b83-c472d2b05aef
          ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2019
          History
          Categories
          Lumbar Spine

          accessory-articulation,Finite Element,low back pain,LSTV,pars inter-articularis,stress

          Comments

          Comment on this article