31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contact with Counter-Stereotypical Women Predicts Less Sexism, Less Rape Myth Acceptance, Less Intention to Rape (in Men) and Less Projected Enjoyment of Rape (in Women)

      research-article
      ,
      Sex Roles
      Springer US
      Contact hypothesis, Sexism, Sexual violence, Violence against women, Rape, Rape myth acceptance

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Intergroup contact—(positive) interactions with people from different social groups—is a widely researched and strongly supported prejudice-reducing mechanism shown to reduce prejudice against a wide variety of outgroups. However, no known previous research has investigated whether intergroup contact can also reduce sexism against women. Sexism has an array of negative outcomes. One of the most detrimental and violent ones is rape, which is both justified and downplayed by rape myth acceptance. We hypothesised that more frequent, higher quality contact with counter-stereotypical women would predict lower levels of sexism and thus less rape myth acceptance (in men) and less sexualised projected responses to rape (in women). Two studies using online surveys with community samples supported these hypotheses. In Study 1, 170 male participants who experienced more positive contact with counter-stereotypical women reported less intention to rape. Similarly, in Study 2, 280 female participants who experienced more positive contact with counter-stereotypical women reported less projected sexual arousal at the thought of being raped. Thus, the present research is the first known to show that contact could be a potential tool to combat sexism, rape myth acceptance, intentions to rape in men, and sexualisation of rape by women.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.

            This chapter presents a review of applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) published in psychological research journals in recent years. We focus first on the variety of research designs and substantive issues to which SEM can be applied productively. We then discuss a number of methodological problems and issues of concern that characterize some of this literature. Although it is clear that SEM is a powerful tool that is being used to great benefit in psychological research, it is also clear that the applied SEM literature is characterized by some chronic problems and that this literature can be considerably improved by greater attention to these issues.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mtasc001@gold.ac.uk
                +44 (0)20 7717 3103 , keon.west@gold.ac.uk
                Journal
                Sex Roles
                Sex Roles
                Sex Roles
                Springer US (New York )
                0360-0025
                30 September 2016
                30 September 2016
                2017
                : 76
                : 7
                : 473-484
                Affiliations
                ISNI 0000 0001 2161 2573, GRID grid.4464.2, Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, , University of London, ; New Cross Road, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3357-4495
                Article
                679
                10.1007/s11199-016-0679-x
                5352770
                28356612
                19ff9004-e9ab-4a3d-b47f-3fddd9049624
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Goldsmiths College
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

                Human biology
                contact hypothesis,sexism,sexual violence,violence against women,rape,rape myth acceptance

                Comments

                Comment on this article