11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Psychometric properties of HeartQoL, a core heart disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire, in Danish implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background Patient-reported health-related quality of life is increasingly used as an outcome measure in clinical trials and as a performance measure to evaluate quality of care. The objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Danish HeartQoL questionnaire, a core heart disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire, in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Design This study involved cross-sectional and test-retest study designs. Method Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients in the cross-sectional study completed the HeartQoL, the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The HeartQoL structure, construct-related validity (convergent and discriminative) and reliability (internal consistency) were assessed. HeartQoL reproducibility (test-retest) was assessed in an independent sample of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Results Mokken scale analysis supported the bi-dimensional structure of HeartQoL among 358 implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Convergent ( r > 0.72) and discriminative validity were confirmed. The HeartQoL scales demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.90). Test-retest reliability (two weeks interval) was assessed in 89 implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients and found to be acceptable for each scale (intra-class correlation > 0.90). Conclusion The Danish HeartQoL questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory key psychometric attributes of validity and reliability in this implantable cardioverter defibrillator population. This study adds support for the HeartQoL as a core heart-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire in a broad group of patients with heart disease including implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cardiovascular health: the importance of measuring patient-reported health status: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Getting serious about test-retest reliability: a critique of retest research and some recommendations.

            To focus attention on the need for rigorous and carefully designed test-retest reliability assessments for new patient-reported outcomes and to encourage retest researchers to be thoughtful, ambitious, and creative in their retest efforts.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The importance of patient-reported outcomes: a call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials.

              Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), or patient perceived health status, are reported directly by the patient and are powerful tools to inform patients, clinicians, and policy-makers about morbidity and 'patient suffering', especially in chronic diseases. Patient-reported outcomes provide information on the patient experience and can be the target of therapeutic intervention. Patient-reported outcomes can improve the quality of patient care by creating a holistic approach to clinical decision-making; however, PROs are not routinely used as key outcome measures in major cardiovascular clinical trials. Thus, limited information is available on the impact of cardiovascular therapeutics on PROs to guide patient-level clinical decision-making or policy-level decision-making. Cardiovascular clinical research should shift its focus to include PROs when evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, and PRO assessments should be scientifically rigorous. The European Society of Cardiology and other professional societies can take action to influence the uptake of PRO data in the research and clinical communities. This process of integrating PRO data into comprehensive efficacy evaluations will ultimately improve the quality of care for patients across the spectrum of cardiovascular disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
                Eur J Prev Cardiolog
                SAGE Publications
                2047-4873
                2047-4881
                November 22 2017
                January 2018
                September 27 2017
                January 2018
                : 25
                : 2
                : 142-149
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care (REHPA), Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
                [2 ]National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
                [3 ]Department of Cardiology, Holbæk Hospital, Denmark
                [4 ]The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
                [5 ]Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
                [6 ]Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital and Research Institute, Bangladesh
                [7 ]Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
                [8 ]College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA
                Article
                10.1177/2047487317733074
                28952795
                1a153f69-eb7e-44f6-a23c-895bce9e3317
                © 2018

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article