21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Publish your biodiversity research with us!

      Submit your article here.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A global checklist of the Bombycoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract
          Background

          Bombycoidea is an ecologically diverse and speciose superfamily of Lepidoptera . The superfamily includes many model organisms, but the taxonomy and classification of the superfamily has remained largely in disarray. Here we present a global checklist of Bombycoidea . Following Zwick (2008) and Zwick et al. (2011), ten families are recognized: Anthelidae , Apatelodidae , Bombycidae , Brahmaeidae , Carthaeidae , Endromidae , Eupterotidae , Phiditiidae , Saturniidae and Sphingidae . The former families Lemoniidae and Mirinidae are included within Brahmaeidae and Endromidae respectively. The former bombycid subfamilies Oberthueriinae and Prismostictinae are also treated as synonyms of Endromidae , and the former bombycine subfamilies Apatelodinae and Phitditiinae are treated as families.

          New information

          This checklist represents the first effort to synthesize the current taxonomic treatment of the entire superfamily. It includes 12,159 names and references to their authors, and it accounts for the recent burst in species and subspecies descriptions within family Saturniidae (ca. 1,500 within the past 10 years) and to a lesser extent in Sphingidae (ca. 250 species over the same period). The changes to the higher classification of Saturniidae proposed by Nässig et al. (2015) are rejected as premature and unnecessary. The new tribes, subtribes and genera described by Cooper (2002) are here treated as junior synonyms. We also present a new higher classification of Sphingidae , based on Kawahara et al. (2009), Barber and Kawahara (2013) and a more recent phylogenomic study by Breinholt et al. (2017), as well as a reviewed genus and species level classification, as documented by Kitching (2018).

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A Large-Scale, Higher-Level, Molecular Phylogenetic Study of the Insect Order Lepidoptera (Moths and Butterflies)

          Background Higher-level relationships within the Lepidoptera, and particularly within the species-rich subclade Ditrysia, are generally not well understood, although recent studies have yielded progress. We present the most comprehensive molecular analysis of lepidopteran phylogeny to date, focusing on relationships among superfamilies. Methodology / Principal Findings 483 taxa spanning 115 of 124 families were sampled for 19 protein-coding nuclear genes, from which maximum likelihood tree estimates and bootstrap percentages were obtained using GARLI. Assessment of heuristic search effectiveness showed that better trees and higher bootstrap percentages probably remain to be discovered even after 1000 or more search replicates, but further search proved impractical even with grid computing. Other analyses explored the effects of sampling nonsynonymous change only versus partitioned and unpartitioned total nucleotide change; deletion of rogue taxa; and compositional heterogeneity. Relationships among the non-ditrysian lineages previously inferred from morphology were largely confirmed, plus some new ones, with strong support. Robust support was also found for divergences among non-apoditrysian lineages of Ditrysia, but only rarely so within Apoditrysia. Paraphyly for Tineoidea is strongly supported by analysis of nonsynonymous-only signal; conflicting, strong support for tineoid monophyly when synonymous signal was added back is shown to result from compositional heterogeneity. Conclusions / Significance Support for among-superfamily relationships outside the Apoditrysia is now generally strong. Comparable support is mostly lacking within Apoditrysia, but dramatically increased bootstrap percentages for some nodes after rogue taxon removal, and concordance with other evidence, strongly suggest that our picture of apoditrysian phylogeny is approximately correct. This study highlights the challenge of finding optimal topologies when analyzing hundreds of taxa. It also shows that some nodes get strong support only when analysis is restricted to nonsynonymous change, while total change is necessary for strong support of others. Thus, multiple types of analyses will be necessary to fully resolve lepidopteran phylogeny.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness

            -
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Resolving relationships among the megadiverse butterflies and moths with a novel pipeline for Anchored Phylogenomics.

              The advent of next-generation sequencing technology has allowed for the collection of large portions of the genome for phylogenetic analysis. Hybrid enrichment and transcriptomics are two techniques that leverage next-generation sequencing and have shown much promise. However, methods for processing hybrid enrichment data are still limited. We developed a pipeline for anchored hybrid enrichment (AHE) read assembly, orthology determination, contamination screening, and data processing for sequences flanking the target "probe" region. We apply this approach to study the phylogeny of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera), a megadiverse group of more than 157,000 described species with poorly understood deep-level phylogenetic relationships. We introduce a new, 855 locus anchored hybrid enrichment kit for Lepidoptera phylogenetics and compare resulting trees to those from transcriptomes. The enrichment kit was designed from existing genomes, transcriptomes and expressed sequence tag (EST) data and was used to capture sequence data from 54 species from 23 lepidopteran families. Phylogenies estimated from AHE data were largely congruent with trees generated from transcriptomes, with strong support for relationships at all but the deepest taxonomic levels. We combine AHE and transcriptomic data to generate a new Lepidoptera phylogeny, representing 76 exemplar species in 42 families. The tree provides robust support for many relationships, including those among the seven butterfly families. The addition of AHE data to an existing transcriptomic dataset lowers node support along the Lepidoptera backbone, but firmly places taxa with AHE data on the phylogeny. To examine the efficacy of AHE at different taxonomic levels, phylogenetic analyses were also conducted on a sister group representing a more recent divergence, the Saturniidae and Sphingidae. These analyses utilized sequences from the probe region and data flanking it, nearly doubled the size of the dataset; all resulting trees were well supported. We hope that our data processing pipeline, hybrid enrichment gene set, and approach of combining AHE data with transcriptomes will be useful for the broader systematics community.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Biodivers Data J
                Biodivers Data J
                Biodiversity Data Journal
                Biodiversity Data Journal
                Biodiversity Data Journal
                Pensoft Publishers
                1314-2828
                2018
                12 February 2018
                : 6
                : e22236
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Université, Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR 7205 – CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Paris, France
                [3 ] CSIRO - Australian National Insect Collection, Canberra, Australia
                [4 ] Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States of America
                [5 ] Hochkirchstrasse 71, Berlin, Germany
                [6 ] CESAB, Centre de Synthèse et d'Analyse sur la Biodiversité, Aix-en-Provence, France
                Author notes
                Corresponding authors: Ian J Kitching ( i.kitching@ 123456nhm.ac.uk ), Rodolphe Rougerie ( rodolphe.rougerie@ 123456mnhn.fr ).

                Academic editor: Yasen Mutafchiev

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6439-5249
                Article
                Biodiversity Data Journal 7470
                10.3897/BDJ.6.e22236
                5904559
                29674935
                1a2f4163-d5c5-4a89-b08e-0debe21da96a
                Ian J Kitching, Rodolphe Rougerie, Andreas Zwick, Chris A Hamilton, Ryan A St Laurent, Stefan Naumann, Liliana Ballesteros Mejia, Akito Y Kawahara

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 13 November 2017
                : 08 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, References: 44
                Funding
                Funded by: Natural Environment Research Council 501100000270 http://doi.org/10.13039/501100000270
                Categories
                Taxonomic Paper
                Bombycoidea
                Catalogues and Checklists
                Nomenclature
                Molecular systematics
                Phylogeny
                Taxonomy
                Neogene
                World

                anthelidae , apatelodidae , bombycidae , bombycoidea , brahmaeidae , carthaeidae ,classification, endromidae , eupterotidae , phiditiidae , saturniidae , sphingidae

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content130

                Cited by14

                Most referenced authors358