2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      We know but we hope: A qualitative study of the opinions and experiences on the inclusion of management, health economics and research in the medical curriculum

      research-article
      1 , * , , 2 , 1
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The achievement of global and national health goals requires a health workforce that is sufficient and trained. Despite considerable steps in medical education, the teaching of management, health economics and research skills for medical doctors are often neglected in medical curricula. This study explored the opinions and experiences of medical doctors and academic educationalists on the inclusion of management, health economics and research in the medical curriculum. A qualitative study was undertaken at four medical schools in Southern Africa (February to April 2021). The study population was medical doctors and academic educationalists. Semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled participants were conducted. All interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Constructivist grounded theory guided the analysis with the use of ATLAS.ti version 9.1.7.0 software. In total, 21 academic educationalists and 28 medical doctors were interviewed. In the first theme We know, participants acknowledged the constraints of medical schools but were adamant that management needed to be taught intentionally and explicitly. The teaching and assessment of management and health economics was generally reported to be ad hoc and unstructured. There was a desire that graduates are able to use, but not necessarily do research. In comparison to management and research, support for the inclusion of health economics in the curriculum was insignificant. Under We hope, educationalists hoped that the formal clinical teaching will somehow instil values and best practices of management and that medical doctors would become health advocates. Most participants wished that research training could be optimised, especially in relation to the duration of allocated time; the timing in the curriculum and the learning outcomes. Despite acknowledgement that management and research are topics that need to be taught, educationalists appeared to rely on chance to teach and assess management in particular. These qualitative study findings will be used to develop a discrete choice experiment to inform optimal curricula design.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Naturalistic inquiry

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                21 October 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 10
                : e0276512
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
                [2 ] Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, King’s College, Aberdeen, Scotland
                University of Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8391-6238
                Article
                PONE-D-22-06496
                10.1371/journal.pone.0276512
                9586360
                36269759
                1a4e1d0a-661d-4d64-afee-78d7f00696ab
                © 2022 Turner et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 4 March 2022
                : 10 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: Department of Research and Innovation, University of Pretoria Research Development Programme
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: University Capacity Development Programme for the University of Pretoria
                Award Recipient :
                AT received the funding for the professional transcription of the interviews and author processing charges from the Department of Research and Innovation, University of Pretoria Research Development Programme https://www.up.ac.za/research-and-innovation and the University Capacity Development Programme for the University of Pretoria https://www.up.ac.za/research-support/article/2746184/research-support-services The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Physicians
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Physicians
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Health Economics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Economics
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Qualitative Studies
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Learning and Memory
                Learning
                Human Learning
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Educational Status
                Graduates
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Educational Status
                Undergraduates
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Education
                Medical Education
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Humanities
                Medical Education
                Custom metadata
                Data cannot be shared publicly because of the sensitive nature of the research and concerns about potential loss of confidentiality and violating the terms of informed consent. The data underlying the results presented in the study (number 277/2020) are available upon request to the Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee, University of Pretoria (contact via +27 (0)12 356 3084 / deepeka.behari@ 123456up.ac.za ).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article