7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness and Safety of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Pooled Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Since it became available in the mid‐2010s, dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation has become part of the armamentarium to treat chronic pain. To date, one randomized controlled trial, and several studies of moderate sample size and various etiologies have been published on this topic. We conducted a pooled analysis to investigate the generalizability of individual studies and to identify differences in outcome between chronic pain etiologic subgroups and/or pain location.

          Materials and Methods

          One prospective, randomized comparative trial and six prospective, single‐arm, observational studies were identified that met pre‐defined acceptance criteria. Pain scores and patient‐reported outcome (PRO) measures were weighted by study sample sizes and pooled. Safety data are reported in aggregate form.

          Results

          Our analysis included 217 patients with a permanent implant at 12‐month follow‐up. Analysis of pooled data showed an overall weighted mean pain score of 3.4, with 63% of patients reporting ≥50% pain relief. Effectiveness sub‐analyses in CRPS‐I, causalgia, and back pain resulted in a mean reduction in pain intensity of 4.9, 4.6, and 3.9 points, respectively. Our pooled analysis showed a pain score for primary affected region ranging from 1.7 (groin) to 3.0 (buttocks) and responder rates of 80% for foot and groin, 75% for leg, and 70% for back. A substantial improvement in all PROs was observed at 12 months. The most commonly reported procedural or device complications were pain at the IPG pocket site, lead fracture, lead migration, and infection.

          Conclusions

          DRG stimulation is an effective and safe therapy for various etiologies of chronic pain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chronic pain epidemiology and its clinical relevance.

          Chronic pain affects ∼20% of the European population and is commoner in women, older people, and with relative deprivation. Its management in the community remains generally unsatisfactory, partly because of lack of evidence for effective interventions. Epidemiological study of chronic pain, through an understanding of its distribution and determinants, can inform the development, targeting, and evaluation of interventions in the general population. This paper reviews current knowledge of risk markers associated with chronic pain and considers how these might inform management and prevention. Risk factors include socio-demographic, clinical, psychological, and biological factors. These are relevant to our understanding of chronic pain mechanisms and the nature of, and responses to, current and future treatments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure?

            The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), and Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) are valid measures of pain intensity. However, ratings on these measures may be influenced by factors other than pain intensity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of non-pain intensity factors on the pain intensity scales. We administered measures of pain intensity (NRS, VAS, VRS, FPS-R), pain unpleasantness, catastrophizing, depressive symptoms, and pain interference to 101 individuals with chronic lower back or knee pain. Correlation analyses examined the associations among the pain intensity scales, and regression analyses evaluated the contributions of the non-pain intensity factors (depressive symptoms, and pain unpleasantness, catastrophizing, and interference) to the VAS, VRS, and FPS-R ratings, while controlling for NRS, age, and gender. Although the NRS, VAS, VRS, FPR-S, scales were strongly associated with one another, supporting their validity as measures of pain intensity, regression analyses showed that the VRS also reflected pain interference, the FPS-R also reflected pain unpleasantness, and the VAS was not associated with any of the additional non-pain intensity factors when controlling for NRS, age, and gender. The VAS appears to be most similar to the NRS and less influenced by non-pain intensity factors than the VRS or FPS-R. Although the VRS and FPS-R ratings both reflect pain intensity, they also contain additional information about pain interference and pain unpleasantness, respectively. These findings should be kept in mind when selecting pain measures and interpreting the results of research studies using these scales. The influence of pain interference and pain unpleasantness on VRS and FPS-R, respectively should be kept in mind when selecting pain measures and interpreting the results of research studies using these scales.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: a randomized comparative trial

              A comparative effectiveness trial indicates that dorsal root ganglion stimulation provided a higher rate of treatment success with less postural variation in paresthesia intensity compared to spinal cord stimulation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                marie.fahey@abbott.com
                Journal
                Neuromodulation
                Neuromodulation
                10.1111/(ISSN)1525-1403
                NER
                Neuromodulation
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                1094-7159
                1525-1403
                15 November 2019
                February 2020
                : 23
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1111/ner.v23.2 )
                : 213-221
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Anesthesiology Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management Arnhem Rijnstate Hospital Velp The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein The Netherlands
                [ 4 ] Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands
                [ 5 ] Department of Functional Neurosurgery and Stereotaxy Heinrich‐Heine‐Universität Düsseldorf Düsseldorf Germany
                [ 6 ] Neuromodulation Division Abbott, Austin TX USA
                [ 7 ] Department of Neurosurgery University of Tuebingen Tuebingen Germany
                [ 8 ] The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias Charleston WV USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Address correspondence to: Marie E. Fahey, PhD, Abbott Laboratories, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building 2 Ste 100, Austin, TX 78746, USA. Email: marie.fahey@ 123456abbott.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0350-7590
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8913-2346
                Article
                NER13074
                10.1111/ner.13074
                7079258
                31730273
                1aa14bb0-43b8-4228-bc1c-fcad51829b90
                © 2019 Abbott. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 04 July 2019
                : 14 October 2019
                : 18 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Pages: 8, Words: 6335
                Categories
                Clinical Research
                Clinical Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.8 mode:remove_FC converted:18.03.2020

                causalgia,complex regional pain syndrome type i,dorsal root ganglion stimulation,failed back surgery syndrome,pooled analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article