1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The chytrid insurance hypothesis: integrating parasitic chytrids into a biodiversity–ecosystem functioning framework for phytoplankton–zooplankton population dynamics

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In temperate lakes, eutrophication and warm temperatures can promote cyanobacteria blooms that reduce water quality and impair food-chain support. Although parasitic chytrids of phytoplankton might compete with zooplankton, they also indirectly support zooplankton populations through the “mycoloop”, which helps move energy and essential dietary molecules from inedible phytoplankton to zooplankton. Here, we consider how the mycoloop might fit into the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) framework. BEF considers how more diverse communities can benefit ecosystem functions like zooplankton production. Chytrids are themselves part of pelagic food webs and they directly contribute to zooplankton diets through spore production and by increasing host edibility. The additional way that chytrids might support BEF is if they engage in “kill-the-winner” dynamics. In contrast to grazers, which result in “eat-the-edible” dynamics, kill-the-winner dynamics can occur for host-specific infectious diseases that control the abundance of dominant (in this case inedible) hosts and thus limit the competitive exclusion of poorer (in this case edible) competitors. Thus, if phytoplankton diversity provides functions, and chytrids support algal diversity, chytrids could indirectly favour edible phytoplankton. All three mechanisms are linked to diversity and therefore provide some “insurance” for zooplankton production against the impacts of eutrophication and warming. In our perspective piece, we explore evidence for the chytrid insurance hypothesis, identify exceptions and knowledge gaps, and outline future research directions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments.

            The impact of biodiversity loss on the functioning of ecosystems and their ability to provide ecological services has become a central issue in ecology. Several experiments have provided evidence that reduced species diversity may impair ecosystem processes such as plant biomass production. The interpretation of these experiments, however, has been controversial because two types of mechanism may operate in combination. In the 'selection effect', dominance by species with particular traits affects ecosystem processes. In the 'complementarity effect', resource partitioning or positive interactions lead to increased total resource use. Here we present a new approach to separate the two effects on the basis of an additive partitioning analogous to the Price equation in evolutionary genetics. Applying this method to data from the pan-European BIODEPTH experiment reveals that the selection effect is zero on average and varies from negative to positive in different localities, depending on whether species with lower- or higher-than-average biomass dominate communities. In contrast, the complementarity effect is positive overall, supporting the hypothesis that plant diversity influences primary production in European grasslands through niche differentiation or facilitation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                abonyi.andras@ecolres.hu
                Journal
                Oecologia
                Oecologia
                Oecologia
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0029-8549
                1432-1939
                16 February 2024
                16 February 2024
                2024
                : 204
                : 2
                : 279-288
                Affiliations
                [1 ]WasserCluster Lunz—Biologische Station GmbH, ( https://ror.org/01q437m46) Dr. Carl Kupelwieser Promenade 5, 3293 Lunz Am See, Austria
                [2 ]GRID grid.481817.3, MTA-ÖK Lendület “Momentum” Fluvial Ecology Research Group, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, ; Karolina Street 29, 1113 Budapest, Hungary
                [3 ]GRID grid.133342.4, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9676, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, , University of California, Santa Barbara, ; Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
                [4 ]Université Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, ( https://ror.org/04gqg1a07) 74200 Thonon-Les-Bains, France
                [5 ]Donau-Universität Krems, ( https://ror.org/03ef4a036) Dr. Karl Dorrek Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria
                [6 ]GRID grid.133342.4, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9676, U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, at Marine Science Institute, UC Santa Barbara, ; Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150 USA
                Author notes

                Communicated by Tara Merrill and Jason Hoverman.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0593-5932
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5350-7401
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6667-8904
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7176-7653
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2388-1504
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7583-4593
                Article
                5519
                10.1007/s00442-024-05519-w
                10907492
                38366067
                1bccfd14-1d76-4d87-91a0-c44fddff57ae
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 December 2023
                : 28 January 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002428, Austrian Science Fund;
                Award ID: FWF Project P 30419-B29
                Funded by: HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research
                Categories
                Special Issue: Parasites in Aquatic Ecology
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024

                Ecology
                buffer,community assembly,disturbance,insurance effect,pufa,trophic transfer
                Ecology
                buffer, community assembly, disturbance, insurance effect, pufa, trophic transfer

                Comments

                Comment on this article