2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Regulation During the Second Year: Executive Function and Emotion Regulation Links to Joint Attention, Temperament, and Social Vulnerability in a Latin American Sample

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although a growing body of work has established developing regulatory abilities during the second year of life, more work is needed to better understand factors that influence this emerging control. The purpose of the present study was to examine regulation capacities in executive functions (i.e., EF or cognitive control) and emotion regulation (i.e., ER or control focused on modulating negative and sustaining positive emotions) in a Latin American sample, with a focus on how joint attention, social vulnerability, and temperament contribute to performance. Sixty Latin American dyads of mothers and children aged 18 to 24 months completed several EF tasks, a Still-Face Paradigm (SFP) to examine ER ( Weinberg et al., 2008), and the Early Social Communication Scale to measure joint attention ( Mundy et al., 2003). Parents completed the Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire Very Short Form to measure temperament (ECBQ-VS, Putnam et al., 2010) and the Social Economic Level Scale (SES) from INDEC (2000). Results revealed the typical responses expected for toddlers of this age in these EF tasks and in the SFP. Also, we found associations between EF and ER and between non-verbal communication related to monitoring infants’ attention to objects (i.e., responding to joint attention) and initiation of pointing (e.g., pointing and showing of an object while the child alternates his gaze to an adult) with EF. Regarding social factors, family differences and type of housing contribute to regulation. For temperament, effortful control was associated with both regulatory capacities. Finally, only age predicted EF. These results suggest that many patterns regarding the development of these abilities are duplicated in the first months of life in a Latin American sample while further highlighting the importance of considering how the environment and the individual characteristics of infants may associate to these regulatory abilities, which is particularly relevant to developing public policies to promote their optimal development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Executive Functions

          Executive functions (EFs) make possible mentally playing with ideas; taking the time to think before acting; meeting novel, unanticipated challenges; resisting temptations; and staying focused. Core EFs are inhibition [response inhibition (self-control—resisting temptations and resisting acting impulsively) and interference control (selective attention and cognitive inhibition)], working memory, and cognitive flexibility (including creatively thinking “outside the box,” seeing anything from different perspectives, and quickly and flexibly adapting to changed circumstances). The developmental progression and representative measures of each are discussed. Controversies are addressed (e.g., the relation between EFs and fluid intelligence, self-regulation, executive attention, and effortful control, and the relation between working memory and inhibition and attention). The importance of social, emotional, and physical health for cognitive health is discussed because stress, lack of sleep, loneliness, or lack of exercise each impair EFs. That EFs are trainable and can be improved with practice is addressed, including diverse methods tried thus far.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions.

            Executive functions (EFs)-a set of general-purpose control processes that regulate one's thoughts and behaviors-have become a popular research topic lately and have been studied in many subdisciplines of psychological science. This article summarizes the EF research that our group has conducted to understand the nature of individual differences in EFs and their cognitive and biological underpinnings. In the context of a new theoretical framework that we have been developing (the unity/diversity framework), we describe four general conclusions that have emerged from our research. Specifically, we argue that individual differences in EFs, as measured with simple laboratory tasks, (1) show both unity and diversity (different EFs are correlated yet separable); (2) reflect substantial genetic contributions; (3) are related to various clinically and societally important phenomena; and (4) show some developmental stability.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Executive Functions and Developmental Psychopathology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                05 July 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 1473
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Facultad de Psicología y Relaciones Humanas, Universidad Abierta Interamericana , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [2] 2Instituto de Investigaciones en Psicología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [3] 3Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas , Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [4] 4Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi , Oxford, MS, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Alexander Gomez-A, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States

                Reviewed by: Anna Waismeyer, University of Washington, United States; Helena R. Slobodskaya, State Scientific-Research Institute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, Russia; Bethany Reeb-Sutherland, Florida International University, United States

                *Correspondence: Angel M. Elgier, angel.elgier@ 123456uai.edu.ar

                This article was submitted to Emotion Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01473
                6624823
                30713512
                1bd2fec3-9bf3-404d-89af-1950f68e5387
                Copyright © 2019 Gago Galvagno, De Grandis, Clerici, Mustaca, Miller and Elgier.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 24 September 2018
                : 11 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 83, Pages: 13, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                executive functions,emotion regulation,joint attention,social vulnerability,temperament,still-face paradigm

                Comments

                Comment on this article