8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Viability of SARS-CoV-2 in river water and wastewater at different temperatures and solids content

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          COVID-19 patients can excrete viable SARS-CoV-2 virus via urine and faeces, which has raised concerns over the possibility of COVID-19 transmission via aerosolized contaminated water or via the faecal-oral route. These concerns are especially exacerbated in many low- and middle-income countries, where untreated sewage is frequently discharged to surface waters. SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected in river water (RW) and raw wastewater (WW) samples. However, little is known about SARS-CoV-2 viability in these environmental matrices. Determining the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in water under different environmental conditions is of great importance for basic assumptions in quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). In this study, the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using plaque assays following spiking of RW and WW samples with infectious SARS-CoV-2 that was previously isolated from a COVID-19 patient. These assays were carried out on autoclaved RW and WW samples, filtered (0.22 µm) and unfiltered, at 4°C and 24°C. Linear and nonlinear regression models were adjusted to the data. The Weibull regression model achieved the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and was hence chosen to estimate T 90 and T 99 (time required for 1 log and 2 log reductions, respectively). SARS-CoV-2 remained viable longer in filtered compared with unfiltered samples. RW and WW showed T 90 values of 1.9 and 1.2 day and T 99 values of 6.4 and 4.0 days, respectively. When samples were filtered through 0.22 µm pore size membranes, T 90 values increased to 3.3 and 1.5 days, and T 99 increased to 8.5 and 4.5 days, for RW and WW samples, respectively. Remarkable increases in SARS-CoV-2 persistence were observed in assays at 4°C, which showed T 90 values of 7.7 and 5.5 days, and T 99 values of 18.7 and 17.5 days for RW and WW, respectively. These results highlight the variability of SARS-CoV-2 persistence in water and wastewater matrices and can be highly relevant to efforts aimed at quantifying water-related risks, which could be valuable for understanding and controlling the pandemic.

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens

          This study describes results of PCR and viral RNA testing for SARS-CoV-2 in bronchoalveolar fluid, sputum, feces, blood, and urine specimens from patients with COVID-19 infection in China to identify possible means of non-respiratory transmission.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evidence for Gastrointestinal Infection of SARS-CoV-2

            Since the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in Wuhan, China, at the end of 2019, the virus has spread to 32 countries, infecting more than 80,000 people and causing more than 2600 deaths globally. The viral infection causes a series of respiratory illnesses, including severe respiratory syndrome, indicating that the virus most likely infects respiratory epithelial cells and spreads mainly via respiratory tract from human to human. However, viral target cells and organs have not been fully determined, impeding our understanding of the pathogenesis of the viral infection and viral transmission routes. According to a recent case report, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in a stool specimen, 1 raising the question of viral gastrointestinal infection and a fecal-oral transmission route. It has been proven that SARS-CoV-2 uses angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2 as a viral receptor for entry process. 2 ACE2 messenger RNA is highly expressed and stabilized by B0AT1 in gastrointestinal system, 3 , 4 providing a prerequisite for SARS-CoV-2 infection. To further investigate the clinical significance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in feces, we examined the viral RNA in feces from 71 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection during their hospitalizations. The viral RNA and viral nucleocapsid protein were examined in gastrointestinal tissues from 1 of the patients. Methods From February 1 to 14, 2020, clinical specimens, including serum, nasopharyngeal, and oropharyngeal swabs; urine; stool; and tissues from 73 hospitalized patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 were obtained in accordance with China Disease Control and Prevention guidelines and tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by using the China Disease Control and Prevention–standardized quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. 5 Clinical characteristics of the 73 patients are shown in Supplementary Table 1. The esophageal, gastric, duodenal, and rectal tissues were obtained from 1 of the patients by using endoscopy. The patient’s clinical information is described in the Supplementary Case Clinical Information and Supplementary Table 2. Histologic staining (H&E) as well as viral receptor ACE2 and viral nucleocapsid staining were performed as described in the Supplementary Methods. The images of fluorescent staining were obtained by using laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSM880, Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Oberkochen, Germany) and are shown in Figure 1 . This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, and all patients signed informed consent forms. Figure 1 Images of histologic and immunofluorescent staining of gastrointestinal tissues. Shown are images of histologic and immunofluorescent staining of esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and rectum. The scale bar in the histologic image represents 100 μm. The scale bar in the immunofluorescent image represents 20 μm. Results From February 1 to 14, 2020, among all of the 73 hospitalized patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, 39 (53.42%), including 25 male and 14 female patients, tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in stool, as shown in Supplementary Table 1. The age of patients with positive results for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in stool ranged from 10 months to 78 years old. The duration time of positive stool results ranged from 1 to 12 days. Furthermore, 17 (23.29%) patients continued to have positive results in stool after showing negative results in respiratory samples. Gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed on a patient as described in the Supplementary Case Clinical Information. As shown in Figure 1, the mucous epithelium of esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and rectum showed no significant damage with H&E staining. Infiltrate of occasional lymphocytes was observed in esophageal squamous epithelium. In lamina propria of the stomach, duodenum, and rectum, numerous infiltrating plasma cells and lymphocytes with interstitial edema were seen. Importantly, viral host receptor ACE2 stained positive mainly in the cytoplasm of gastrointestinal epithelial cells (Figure 1). We observed that ACE2 is rarely expressed in esophageal epithelium but is abundantly distributed in the cilia of the glandular epithelia. Staining of viral nucleocapsid protein was visualized in the cytoplasm of gastric, duodenal, and rectum glandular epithelial cell, but not in esophageal epithelium. The positive staining of ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 was also observed in gastrointestinal epithelium from other patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in feces (data not shown). Discussion In this article, we provide evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2 and its possible fecal-oral transmission route. Because viruses spread from infected to uninfected cells, 6 viral-specific target cells or organs are determinants of viral transmission routes. Receptor-mediated viral entry into a host cell is the first step of viral infection. Our immunofluorescent data showed that ACE2 protein, which has been proven to be a cell receptor for SARS-CoV-2, is abundantly expressed in the glandular cells of gastric, duodenal, and rectal epithelia, supporting the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the host cells. ACE2 staining is rarely seen in esophageal mucosa, probably because the esophageal epithelium is mainly composed of squamous epithelial cells, which express less ACE2 than glandular epithelial cells. Our results of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection and intracellular staining of viral nucleocapsid protein in gastric, duodenal, and rectal epithelia demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infects these gastrointestinal glandular epithelial cells. Although viral RNA was also detected in esophageal mucous tissue, absence of viral nucleocapsid protein staining in esophageal mucosa indicates low viral infection in esophageal mucosa. After viral entry, virus-specific RNA and proteins are synthesized in the cytoplasm to assemble new virions, 7 which can be released to the gastrointestinal tract. The continuous positive detection of viral RNA from feces suggests that the infectious virions are secreted from the virus-infected gastrointestinal cells. Recently, we and others have isolated infectious SARS-CoV-2 from stool (unpublished data), confirming the release of the infectious virions to the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, fecal-oral transmission could be an additional route for viral spread. Prevention of fecal-oral transmission should be taken into consideration to control the spread of the virus. Our results highlight the clinical significance of testing viral RNA in feces by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) because infectious virions released from the gastrointestinal tract can be monitored by the test. According to the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance for the disposition of patients with SARS-CoV-2, the decision to discontinue transmission-based precautions for hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 is based on negative results rRT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 from at least 2 sequential respiratory tract specimens collected ≥24 hours apart. 8 However, in more than 20% of patients with SARS-CoV-2, we observed that the test result for viral RNA remained positive in feces, even after test results for viral RNA in the respiratory tract converted to negative, indicating that the viral gastrointestinal infection and potential fecal-oral transmission can last even after viral clearance in the respiratory tract. Therefore, we strongly recommend that rRT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 from feces should be performed routinely in patients with SARS-CoV-2 and that transmission-based precautions for hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 should continue if feces test results are positive by rRT-PCR testing.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in faecal samples

              We present severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) real-time RT-PCR results of all respiratory and faecal samples from patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China, throughout the course of their illness and obligated quarantine period. Real-time RT-PCR was used to detect COVID-19 following the recommended protocol (appendix p 1). Patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 were confirmed after two sequential positive respiratory tract sample results. Respiratory and faecal samples were collected every 1–2 days (depending on the availability of faecal samples) until two sequential negative results were obtained. We reviewed patients' demographic information, underlying diseases, clinical indices, and treatments from their official medical records. The study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (approval number K162-1) and informed consent was obtained from participants. Notably, patients who met discharge criteria were allowed to stay in hospital for extended observation and health care. Between Jan 16 and March 15, 2020, we enrolled 98 patients. Both respiratory and faecal samples were collected from 74 (76%) patients. Faecal samples from 33 (45%) of 74 patients were negative for SARS CoV-2 RNA, while their respiratory swabs remained positive for a mean of 15·4 days (SD 6·7) from first symptom onset. Of the 41 (55%) of 74 patients with faecal samples that were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, respiratory samples remained positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA for a mean of 16·7 days (SD 6·7) and faecal samples remained positive for a mean of 27·9 days (10·7) after first symptom onset (ie, for a mean of 11·2 days [9·2] longer than for respiratory samples). The full disease course of the 41 patients with faecal samples that were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA is shown in the figure . Notably, patient 1 had positive faecal samples for 33 days continuously after the respiratory samples became negative, and patient 4 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in their faecal sample for 47 days after first symptom onset (appendix pp 4–5). Figure Timeline of results from throat swabs and faecal samples through the course of disease for 41 patients with SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive faecal samples, January to March, 2020 A summary of clinical symptoms and medical treatments is shown in the appendix (pp 2–3, 6–8). The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms was not associated with faecal sample viral RNA positivity (p=0·45); disease severity was not associated with extended duration of faecal sample viral RNA positivity (p=0·60); however, antiviral treatment was positively associated with the presence of viral RNA in faecal samples (p=0·025; appendix pp 2–3). These associations should be interpreted with caution because of the possibility of confounding. Additionally, the Ct values of all three targeted genes (RdRp, N, E) in the first faecal sample that was positive for viral RNA were negatively associated with the duration of faecal viral RNA positivity (RdRp gene r= –0·34; N gene r= –0·02; and E gene r= –0·16), whereas the correlation of the Ct values with duration of faecal sample positivity was only significant for RdRp (p=0·033; N gene p=0·91; E gene p=0·33). Our data suggest the possibility of extended duration of viral shedding in faeces, for nearly 5 weeks after the patients' respiratory samples tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Although knowledge about the viability of SARS-CoV-2 is limited, 1 the virus could remain viable in the environment for days, which could lead to faecal–oral transmission, as seen with severe acute respiratory virus CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome CoV. 2 Therefore, routine stool sample testing with real-time RT-PCR is highly recommended after the clearance of viral RNA in a patient's respiratory samples. Strict precautions to prevent transmission should be taken for patients who are in hospital or self-quarantined if their faecal samples test positive. As with any new infectious disease, case definition evolves rapidly as knowledge of the disease accrues. Our data suggest that faecal sample positivity for SARS-CoV-2 RNA normally lags behind that of respiratory tract samples; therefore, we do not suggest the addition of testing of faecal samples to the existing diagnostic procedures for COVID-19. However, the decision on when to discontinue precautions to prevent transmission in patients who have recovered from COVID-19 is crucial for management of medical resources. We would suggest the addition of faecal testing for SARS-CoV-2. 3 Presently, the decision to discharge a patient is made if they show no relevant symptoms and at least two sequential negative results by real-time RT-PCR of sputum or respiratory tract samples collected more than 24 h apart. Here, we observed that for over half of patients, their faecal samples remained positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA for a mean of 11·2 days after respiratory tract samples became negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, implying that the virus is actively replicating in the patient's gastrointestinal tract and that faecal–oral transmission could occur after viral clearance in the respiratory tract. Determining whether a virus is viable using nucleic acid detection is difficult; further research using fresh stool samples at later timepoints in patients with extended duration of faecal sample positivity is required to define transmission potential. Additionally, we found patients normally had no or very mild symptoms after respiratory tract sample results became negative (data not shown); however, asymptomatic transmission has been reported. 4 No cases of transmission via the faecal–oral route have yet been reported for SARS-CoV-2, which might suggest that infection via this route is unlikely in quarantine facilities, in hospital, or while under self-isolation. However, potential faecal–oral transmission might pose an increased risk in contained living premises such as hostels, dormitories, trains, buses, and cruise ships. Respiratory transmission is still the primary route for SARS-CoV-2 and evidence is not yet sufficient to develop practical measures for the group of patients with negative respiratory tract sample results but positive faecal samples. Further research into the viability and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in faeces is required.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Water Res
                Water Res
                Water Research
                Elsevier Ltd.
                0043-1354
                1879-2448
                3 March 2021
                3 March 2021
                : 117002
                Affiliations
                [a ]Biochemistry and Immunology Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
                [b ]Deparment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
                [c ]Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
                [d ]Minas Gerais State Health Authority (SES)
                [e ]Sanitation Company for Minas Gerais (COPASA)
                [f ]Minas Gerais Institute for Water Management (IGAM)
                [g ]Regulatory Agency for Water Supply and Sewage Services of the State of Minas Gerais (ARSAE)
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding authors.
                Article
                S0043-1354(21)00200-1 117002
                10.1016/j.watres.2021.117002
                7927590
                33714910
                1c0f3432-aa13-4b73-92ea-e12763a4b9c7
                © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Oceanography & Hydrology
                sars-cov-2,viability,persistence,water,wastewater,temperature
                Oceanography & Hydrology
                sars-cov-2, viability, persistence, water, wastewater, temperature

                Comments

                Comment on this article