2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Severe illness getting noticed sooner: SIGNS-for-Kids—initial validity assessment of a paediatric illness recognition tool for caregivers

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Timely identification of severe illness provides opportunity to prevent clinical deterioration and reduce morbidity and mortality.1–4 An expert panel consisting of parents and multidisciplinary providers created the Severe Illness Getting Noticed Sooner (SIGNS)-for-Kids as a public health tool to help caregivers identify and articulate the manifestations of severe illness in children.5 The tool was created during a consensus development workshop to incorporate expert opinion and previously published symptom checklists of severe illness.6 7 The SIGNS tool consists of 5 domains (behaviour, breathing, skin, fluids and response to usually effective treatment) and 13 subdomains. The objective of this study was to review the sensitivity of the SIGNS-for-Kids items in a cohort of children with fatal illnesses as an initial validation step. Methods A retrospective review of paediatric deaths was performed using records from the local coroner’s office. Information available included summative coroner reports and comprehensive medical records. Eligible patients had an index deterioration event described between January 2013 and December 2018, were ≤18 years and ≥36 weeks gestational age at the time of event, had observations or reports for >6 hours prior to the index event and were not in an intensive care unit (ICU) or under anaesthetist supervision at the time of index event. Index deterioration events were defined as cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, intubation, transfer to ICU, interfacility transfer or urgent surgical procedure. We excluded patients with trauma or sudden unexplained death. The main outcome was the presence of SIGNS items. Secondary measures were the time before index event that SIGNS was present and the time to death from the index event. Analyses were descriptive and were performed using SAS V.9.4 (SAS Institute). Results We screened 200 records and excluded 150 children with either traumatic death (n=77), less than 6 hours of documentation before the index event (n=61), ineligible age (n=7) or a diagnosis of sudden unexplained death (n=5). The 50 studied children had mean (SD) age of 32.0 (50.8) months. The index events were cardiac arrest in 25 (50%), endotracheal intubation in 12 (24%), interfacility transfer in 8 (16%) and respiratory arrest in 5 (10%). The diagnoses associated with the index event included respiratory in 33 (66%), circulatory in 24 (48%), infectious in 18 (36%) and endocrine/metabolic in 8 (16%). One or more SIGNS criteria were present prior to index event in 48 (96%) children. Items from two SIGNS categories were present in 14 (28%), of which the most common combinations were behaviour/breathing (n=5) and behaviour/fluids (n=5). Items from three SIGNS categories were present in 6 (12%), with the most common combinations being behaviour/skin/fluids (n=2) and behaviour/breathing/skin (n=2). SIGNS was present ≥24 hours before initial escalation in 28 (56%) children, and death occurred within 48 hours after index event in 42 (84%) (figure 1). Proportions of children with each SIGNS item present and median duration prior to index deterioration are presented in table 1. Table 1 Proportion of children with SIGNS items present prior to index event SIGNS category SIGNS subcategory Item N (%) Category N (%) Hours prior to index event median (IQR) Behaviour Reduced interaction 7 (14) 22 (44) 24.0 (8.3–43.8) Reduced independent actions 16 (32) Abnormal or lack of movement 2 (4) Breathing Noticeable breathing 20 (40) 26 (52) 36.0 (8.3–49.5) Long pauses between breaths 6 (12) Skin Jaundice in the first month of life 0 (0) 10 (20) 8.5 (6.3–18.0) Mottled and cold skin (and other) 10 (20) Blue(ish) skin and tongue 1 (2) Purple rash 0 (0) Fluids Persistent vomiting 7 (14) 21 (42) 24.0 (7.0–55.0) Colourful vomiting 3 (6) Minimal fluid intake 13 (26) Not passing urine 3 (6) Treatment No treatment response 1 (2) 1 (2) Any   48 (96) 24.0 (9.0–48.5) SIGNS, Severe Illness Getting Noticed Sooner. Figure 1 Data were abstracted from Ontario Coroners records of 50 paediatric (>8 hours of age and <18 years) non-traumatic deaths with escalation events (intubation, transfer to ICU, CPR) that occurred outside an ICU or Anaesthetist supervised area; 48 (96%) had one or more SIGNS criteria documented in the available records. More than half of cases had SIGNS criteria documented for 24 hours before index escalation event and 42 (84%) died within 48 hours after escalation. Breathing abnormality was observed in 26 (52%) with median duration of 36.0 (8.3–49.5) hours before index event. The most common breathing abnormality was ‘noticeable breathing’ in 20 (40%). Behaviour abnormality was observed in 22 (44%) with median duration of 24.0 (8.3–43.8) hours prior to event. The most common behaviour abnormality, reduced independent actions, occurred in 16 (32%). Fluid abnormality was present in 21 (42%) with median duration of 24.0 (7.0–55.0) hours prior to event. The most common fluid abnormality, minimal intake, occurred in 13 (26%). No children had jaundice in the first month of life or a purple rash. Death occurred within 48 hours after index event in 42 (84%). Discussion This retrospective evaluation suggests the potential utility of the SIGNS criteria to identify children with severe illness. Almost all children with fatal illness had one or more SIGNS, and SIGNS items were present long enough to permit timely intervention and care escalation. The four main limitations of this study are: its retrospective design, the selection of children with fatal illnesses who may have progressed to death even if intervention had occurred earlier, the exclusion of children with sudden unexplained death (where SIGNS should be absent), and parental recall and clinician ascertainment biases that may follow recognition of severe illness. Future prospective studies in children with and without critical illness are needed to further evaluate the validity and caregiver usability prior to clinical implementation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Multicentre validation of the bedside paediatric early warning system score: a severity of illness score to detect evolving critical illness in hospitalised children

          Introduction The timely provision of critical care to hospitalised patients at risk for cardiopulmonary arrest is contingent upon identification and referral by frontline providers. Current approaches require improvement. In a single-centre study, we developed the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System (Bedside PEWS) score to identify patients at risk. The objective of this study was to validate the Bedside PEWS score in a large patient population at multiple hospitals. Methods We performed an international, multicentre, case-control study of children admitted to hospital inpatient units with no limitations on care. Case patients had experienced a clinical deterioration event involving either an immediate call to a resuscitation team or urgent admission to a paediatric intensive care unit. Control patients had no events. The scores ranged from 0 to 26 and were assessed in the 24 hours prior to the clinical deterioration event. Score performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUCROC) curve by comparison with the retrospective rating of nurses and the temporal progression of scores in case patients. Results A total of 2,074 patients were evaluated at 4 participating hospitals. The median (interquartile range) maximum Bedside PEWS scores for the 12 hours ending 1 hour before the clinical deterioration event were 8 (5 to 12) in case patients and 2 (1 to 4) in control patients (P < 0.0001). The AUCROC curve (95% confidence interval) was 0.87 (0.85 to 0.89). In case patients, mean scores were 5.3 at 20 to 24 hours and 8.4 at 0 to 4 hours before the event (P < 0.0001). The AUCROC curve (95% CI) of the retrospective nurse ratings was 0.83 (0.81 to 0.86). This was significantly lower than that of the Bedside PEWS score (P < 0.0001). Conclusions The Bedside PEWS score identified children at risk for cardiopulmonary arrest. Scores were elevated and continued to increase in the 24 hours before the clinical deterioration event. Prospective clinical evaluation is needed to determine whether this score will improve the quality of care and patient outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of a rapid response team on hospital-wide mortality and code rates outside the ICU in a Children's Hospital.

            Introduction of a rapid response team (RRT) has been shown to decrease mortality and cardiopulmonary arrests outside of the intensive care unit (ICU) in adult inpatients. No published studies to date show significant reductions in mortality or cardiopulmonary arrests in pediatric inpatients. To determine the effect on hospital-wide mortality rates and code rates outside of the ICU setting after RRT implementation at an academic children's hospital. A cohort study design with historical controls at a 264-bed, free-standing, quaternary care academic children's hospital. Pediatric inpatients who spent at least 1 day on a medical or surgical ward between January 1, 2001, and March 31, 2007, were included. A total of 22,037 patient admissions and 102,537 patient-days were evaluated preintervention (before September 1, 2005), and 7257 patient admissions and 34,420 patient-days were evaluated postintervention (on or after September 1, 2005). The RRT included a pediatric ICU-trained fellow or attending physician, ICU nurse, ICU respiratory therapist, and nursing supervisor. This team was activated using standard criteria and was available at all times to assess, treat, and triage decompensating pediatric inpatients. Hospital-wide mortality rates and code (respiratory and cardiopulmonary arrests) rates outside of the ICU setting. All outcomes were adjusted for case mix index values. After RRT implementation, the mean monthly mortality rate decreased by 18% (1.01 to 0.83 deaths per 100 discharges; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-30%; P = .007), the mean monthly code rate per 1000 admissions decreased by 71.7% (2.45 to 0.69 codes per 1000 admissions), and the mean monthly code rate per 1000 patient-days decreased by 71.2% (0.52 to 0.15 codes per 1000 patient-days). The estimated code rate per 1000 admissions for the postintervention group was 0.29 times that for the preintervention group (95% likelihood ratio CI, 0.10-0.65; P = .008), and the estimated code rate per 1000 patient-days for the postintervention group was 0.28 times that for the preintervention group (95% likelihood ratio CI, 0.10-0.64; P = .007). Implementation of an RRT was associated with a statistically significant reduction in hospital-wide mortality rate and code rate outside of the pediatric ICU setting.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of a Pediatric Early Warning System on All-Cause Mortality in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients

              There is limited evidence that the use of severity of illness scores in pediatric patients can facilitate timely admission to the intensive care unit or improve patient outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open Qual
                BMJ Open Qual
                bmjqir
                bmjoq
                BMJ Open Quality
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2399-6641
                2022
                17 March 2022
                : 11
                : 1
                : e001664
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentCritical Care Medicine , The Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ]departmentPaediatrics and Critical Care Medicine , University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ]departmentCenter for Safety Research , SickKids , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ]Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ]departmentChild Health Evaluative Sciences Program , SickKids Research Institute , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Christopher S Parshuram; chris@ 123456sickkids.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0998-3731
                Article
                bmjoq-2021-001664
                10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001664
                8932283
                35301184
                1c0f3fdd-e079-454c-b72a-1f0874633072
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 14 October 2021
                : 06 March 2022
                Categories
                Short Report
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                paediatrics,educational outreach, academic detialing,patient education

                Comments

                Comment on this article