15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Modern theories of human evolution foreshadowed by Darwin’s Descent of Man

      1 , 2 , 3
      Science
      American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Charles Darwin’s The Descent of Man, published 150 years ago, laid the grounds for scientific studies into human origins and evolution. Three of his insights have been reinforced by modern science. The first is that we share many characteristics (genetic, developmental, physiological, morphological, cognitive, and psychological) with our closest relatives, the anthropoid apes. The second is that humans have a talent for high-level cooperation reinforced by morality and social norms. The third is that we have greatly expanded the social learning capacity that we see already in other primates. Darwin’s emphasis on the role of culture deserves special attention because during an increasingly unstable Pleistocene environment, cultural accumulation allowed changes in life history; increased cognition; and the appearance of language, social norms, and institutions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Inference of Human Population History From Whole Genome Sequence of A Single Individual

            The history of human population size is important to understanding human evolution. Various studies 1-5 have found evidence for a founder event (bottleneck) in East Asian and European populations associated with the human dispersal out-of-Africa event around 60 thousand years ago (kya) before present. However, these studies have to assume simplified demographic models with few parameters and do not precisely date the start and stop times of the bottleneck. Here, with fewer assumptions on population size changes, we present a more detailed history of human population sizes between approximately ten thousand to a million years ago, using the pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent (PSMC) model applied to the complete diploid genome sequences of a Chinese male (YH) 6 , a Korean male (SJK) 7 , three European individuals (Venter 8 , NA12891 and NA12878 9 ) and two Yoruba males (NA18507 10 and NA19239). We infer that European and Chinese populations had very similar population size histories before 10–20kya. Both populations experienced a severe bottleneck between 10–60kya while African populations experienced a milder bottleneck from which they recovered earlier. All three populations have an elevated effective population size between 60–250kya, possibly due to a population structure 11 . We also infer that the differentiation of genetically modern humans may have started as early as 100–120kya 12 , but considerable genetic exchanges may still have occurred until 20–40kya.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

              Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Science
                Science
                American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
                0036-8075
                1095-9203
                May 20 2021
                May 21 2021
                May 20 2021
                May 21 2021
                : 372
                : 6544
                : eaba3776
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
                [2 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Mathematics, National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, Center for the Dynamics of Social Complexity, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
                [3 ]Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
                Article
                10.1126/science.aba3776
                34016754
                1c30646a-21c6-404e-ab63-683e16098856
                © 2021

                https://www.sciencemag.org/about/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article