3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Regulating flavours in cigarettes: A call to action

      editorial

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Flavoured cigarettes threaten tobacco control efforts by masking the harshness of tobacco smoke, reducing perceptions of harmfulness, and facilitating smoking initiation 1 . Menthol, the most prominent cigarette flavour, has unique sensory properties that can promote addiction through reinforcing the actions of nicotine on the brain 1 . In addition to menthol’s effect on sensory perceptions, recent studies indicate that the cigarette package design of these products may also facilitate use. In particular, innovative crushable filter capsules may enhance the ritual behaviour of cigarette smoking 2 . Differences between menthol and non-mentholated cigarette packaging and labelling have also been observed 3 . Flavoured cigarettes are further used disproportionately by vulnerable populations, including adolescents and young adults, racial/ethnic and sexual minority groups 4–6 . Studies have found that compared to non-flavoured cigarette users, menthol and other flavoured cigarette users are less nicotine dependent, which is a predictor of quit attempts 7 . This is promising in light of tobacco control policies regulating flavours, including menthol, such as the European Tobacco Products Directive (TPD), which went into effect in May 2016 requiring European Union (EU) Member States to ban characterising flavours in cigarettes with a grace period until May 2020 for menthol 8 . Such policies, which have gained momentum in other countries worldwide 1,9 , have created an unprecedented opportunity not to just prevent smoking initiation but to facilitate smokers of flavoured cigarettes to quit. Unfortunately, the maximum impact of policies regulating flavours may not be attained without simultaneous efforts to promote smoking cessation—namely implementation of Article 14 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC). In a study of adult smokers in the EU, only a minority of menthol cigarette users responded that they would quit smoking when the TPD ban on menthol came into effect 5 . As the menthol ban in the EU takes effect in May of this year, now more than ever we must prioritize efforts to promote smoking cessation and reduce barriers faced in implementing WHO FCTC Article 14 10 . In light of the scarcity of research in flavour regulations, coupled with a lack of full guidelines of WHO FCTC Article 9 (Regulation of the contents of tobacco products) 11 , it is further critical to identify the best practices for regulating flavours and evaluating their impact to inform future policies in other countries. Tobacco control advocates, researchers and policymakers should be encouraged to initiate or continue the regulation of flavours in cigarettes, evaluate its impact and maximise its implementation through supporting smokers to quit.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Characterising smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes, their attitudes towards tobacco regulation, and the anticipated impact of the Tobacco Products Directive on their smoking and quitting behaviours: The EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys

          INTRODUCTION Little research exists on the sociodemographic characteristics of menthol and flavoured cigarette (MFC) smokers in Europe. This study assessed the proportion of MFC smokers in Europe, their sociodemographic characteristics, and their attitudes towards tobacco control measures. METHODS Cross-sectional data were collected in 2016 among 10760 adult current smokers from 8 European countries (ITC Europe Project and EUREST-PLUS). Smokers of menthol, other flavoured, unflavoured tobacco, or no usual brand were compared on sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes towards a range of tobacco control measures (e.g. ban on flavouring), and on intentions regarding their smoking behaviour following the ban on flavoured tobacco. Data were analysed in SPSS Complex Samples Package using univariate analyses. RESULTS Among the respondents, 7.4% smoked menthol cigarettes and 2.9% other flavoured tobacco, but large differences existed between countries (e.g. 0.4% smokers smoked menthol cigarettes in Spain vs 12.4% in England). Compared to other groups, menthol cigarette smokers were younger, more likely to be female, better educated, had higher household income, and smoked fewer cigarettes (all p<0.001). A quarter of menthol smokers supported a ban on additives, compared with almost half of all other smokers (p<0.001). In case of a ban on flavourings, around a fifth of all MFC smokers intended to switch to another brand, and a third to reduce the amount they smoked or to quit smoking, but there was no consistent pattern across MFC smokers among the countries. CONCLUSIONS The ban on flavourings introduced by the EU Tobacco Products Directive (extended to 2020 for menthols) will affect one in ten smokers in the countries surveyed, which provides an opportunity for targeting these groups with cessation programmes. However, smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes in the different European countries are a heterogeneous group and may need different approaches.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Tobacco control and prevention efforts in Ethiopia pre- and post-ratification of WHO FCTC: Current challenges and future directions

            INTRODUCTION Being the second most populous African country, Ethiopia represents a huge opportunity for the tobacco industry to recruit new smokers. Ethiopia signed the convention to ratify WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in 2004 and ratified in 2014. We reviewed Ethiopia’s tobacco control legislative history pre- and post-ratification of the WHO FCTC and evaluated the level of compliance of the National Tobacco Control Directive (NTCD) with the WHO FCTC. METHODS We reviewed Ethiopia’s tobacco legislative history, the NCTD, the National Tobacco Control Strategic Plan, and tobacco control related media stories from 2009 to 2018. The level of compliance of NTCD with WHO FCTC was compared and qualitatively analysed. RESULTS NTCD 2015 is Ethiopia’s first comprehensive tobacco control legislation, which for the most part is WHO FCTC compliant. The legislation prohibits, among other things, sale of flavoured tobacco products including menthol, sale of tobacco products to a person under the age of 18 years and bans all forms of tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship. Yet, the current legislation allows smoking designated rooms in some prohibited places. Although a multi-sectoral National Tobacco Control Committee and a Strategic Plan were developed as per Article 5 of WHO FCTC, activities pertaining to the protection of such tobacco control policies from vested interests of the tobacco industry (WHO FCTC Article 5.3) are not addressed in NTCD 2015. CONCLUSIONS Major gaps in the NTCD 2015 such as allowing smoking designated rooms should be addressed in order to stop the tobacco industry from using such loopholes to interfere with national tobacco control policies and/or maintain its tobacco market. Moreover, the tobacco control policies and efforts should be institutionalized across various sectors in order to ensure implementation of the NTCD.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Challenges to implementing the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control guidelines on tobacco cessation treatment: a qualitative analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Tob Prev Cessat
                Tob Prev Cessat
                TPC
                Tobacco Prevention & Cessation
                European Publishing on behalf of the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP)
                2459-3087
                04 June 2020
                2020
                : 6
                : 33
                Affiliations
                [1 ] School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
                Author notes
                CORRESPONDENCE TO Christina Ν. Kyriakos. School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 715 00, Greece. E-mail: ckyriakos@ 123456tobcontrol.eu ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-00030486-9152
                Article
                33
                10.18332/tpc/122438
                7398135
                1c5c0e26-e0a3-432d-9408-b993daf17e63
                © 2020 Kyriakos C. N

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 13 May 2020
                : 14 May 2020
                Categories
                Editorial

                menthol,who fctc,tobacco control policies,tobacco products directive,smoking cessation

                Comments

                Comment on this article