94
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations

      The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Older adults and special populations (living with disability and/or chronic illness that may limit mobility and/or physical endurance) can benefit from practicing a more physically active lifestyle, typically by increasing ambulatory activity. Step counting devices (accelerometers and pedometers) offer an opportunity to monitor daily ambulatory activity; however, an appropriate translation of public health guidelines in terms of steps/day is unknown. Therefore this review was conducted to translate public health recommendations in terms of steps/day. Normative data indicates that 1) healthy older adults average 2,000-9,000 steps/day, and 2) special populations average 1,200-8,800 steps/day. Pedometer-based interventions in older adults and special populations elicit a weighted increase of approximately 775 steps/day (or an effect size of 0.26) and 2,215 steps/day (or an effect size of 0.67), respectively. There is no evidence to inform a moderate intensity cadence (i.e., steps/minute) in older adults at this time. However, using the adult cadence of 100 steps/minute to demark the lower end of an absolutely-defined moderate intensity (i.e., 3 METs), and multiplying this by 30 minutes produces a reasonable heuristic (i.e., guiding) value of 3,000 steps. However, this cadence may be unattainable in some frail/diseased populations. Regardless, to truly translate public health guidelines, these steps should be taken over and above activities performed in the course of daily living, be of at least moderate intensity accumulated in minimally 10 minute bouts, and add up to at least 150 minutes over the week. Considering a daily background of 5,000 steps/day (which may actually be too high for some older adults and/or special populations), a computed translation approximates 8,000 steps on days that include a target of achieving 30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and approximately 7,100 steps/day if averaged over a week. Measured directly and including these background activities, the evidence suggests that 30 minutes of daily MVPA accumulated in addition to habitual daily activities in healthy older adults is equivalent to taking approximately 7,000-10,000 steps/day. Those living with disability and/or chronic illness (that limits mobility and or/physical endurance) display lower levels of background daily activity, and this will affect whole-day estimates of recommended physical activity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references108

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health.

          Pedometers are simple and inexpensive body-worn motion sensors that are readily being used by researchers and practitioners to assess and motivate physical activity behaviours. Pedometer-determined physical activity indices are needed to guide their efforts. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review the rationale and evidence for general pedometer-based indices for research and practice purposes. Specifically, we evaluate popular recommendations for steps/day and attempt to translate existing physical activity guidelines into steps/day equivalents. Also, we appraise the fragmented evidence currently available from associations derived from cross-sectional studies and a limited number of interventions that have documented improvements (primarily in body composition and/or blood pressure) with increased steps/day.A value of 10000 steps/day is gaining popularity with the media and in practice and can be traced to Japanese walking clubs and a business slogan 30+ years ago. 10000 steps/day appears to be a reasonable estimate of daily activity for apparently healthy adults and studies are emerging documenting the health benefits of attaining similar levels. Preliminary evidence suggests that a goal of 10000 steps/day may not be sustainable for some groups, including older adults and those living with chronic diseases. Another concern about using 10000 steps/day as a universal step goal is that it is probably too low for children, an important target population in the war against obesity. Other approaches to pedometer-determined physical activity recommendations that are showing promise of health benefit and individual sustainability have been based on incremental improvements relative to baseline values. Based on currently available evidence, we propose the following preliminary indices be used to classify pedometer-determined physical activity in healthy adults: (i). or=10000 steps/day indicates the point that should be used to classify individuals as 'active'. Individuals who take >12500 steps/day are likely to be classified as 'highly active'.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Physical activity and functional limitations in older adults: a systematic review related to Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines

            Background The purpose was to conduct systematic reviews of the relationship between physical activity of healthy community-dwelling older (>65 years) adults and outcomes of functional limitations, disability, or loss of independence. Methods Prospective cohort studies with an outcome related to functional independence or to cognitive function were searched, as well as exercise training interventions that reported a functional outcome. Electronic database search strategies were used to identify citations which were screened (title and abstract) for inclusion. Included articles were reviewed to complete standardized data extraction tables, and assess study quality. An established system of assessing the level and grade of evidence for recommendations was employed. Results Sixty-six studies met inclusion criteria for the relationship between physical activity and functional independence, and 34 were included with a cognitive function outcome. Greater physical activity of an aerobic nature (categorized by a variety of methods) was associated with higher functional status (expressed by a host of outcome measures) in older age. For functional independence, moderate (and high) levels of physical activity appeared effective in conferring a reduced risk (odds ratio ~0.5) of functional limitations or disability. Limitation in higher level performance outcomes was reduced (odds ratio ~0.5) with vigorous (or high) activity with an apparent dose-response of moderate through to high activity. Exercise training interventions (including aerobic and resistance) of older adults showed improvement in physiological and functional measures, and suggestion of longer-term reduction in incidence of mobility disability. A relatively high level of physical activity was related to better cognitive function and reduced risk of developing dementia; however, there were mixed results of the effects of exercise interventions on cognitive function indices. Conclusions There is a consistency of findings across studies and a range of outcome measures related to functional independence; regular aerobic activity and short-term exercise programmes confer a reduced risk of functional limitations and disability in older age. Although a precise characterization of a minimal or effective physical activity dose to maintain functional independence is difficult, it appears moderate to higher levels of activity are effective and there may be a threshold of at least moderate activity for significant outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              How Many Steps/Day Are Enough?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
                The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
                BioMed Central
                1479-5868
                2011
                28 July 2011
                : 8
                : 80
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Walking Behaviour Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
                [2 ]Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute, 201-185 Somerset Street West Ottawa, ON, K2P 0J2, Canada
                [3 ]School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building (A27), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
                [4 ]Exercise Sciences Research Group, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakaecho, Tokyo Itabashi, Tokyo 173, Japan
                [5 ]Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, 4-10 Agriculture/Forestry Centre University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2P5, Canada
                [6 ]Department of Exercise, Health, and Sport Sciences, University of Southern Maine, 37 College Ave, Gorham, USA
                [7 ]Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 25, Ghent University, B - 9000 Ghent, Belgium
                [8 ]Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
                [9 ]CMRI Diabetes and Metabolic Research Program, Harold Hamm Oklahoma Diabetes Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 1000 N. Lincoln Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
                [10 ]Tokyo Gakugei University, 4-1-1 Nukuikitamachi, Koganeisi, Tokyo 184-8501, Japan
                [11 ]Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
                [12 ]Centro de Estudos do Laboratório de Aptidão Física de São Caetano do Sul (CELAFISCS) & Agita São Paulo, São Caetano do Sul, Brazil
                [13 ]Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Springfield IL
                [14 ]Department of Physical Education and Recreation, Rio Piedras Campus, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
                [15 ]Department of Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
                [16 ]School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
                [17 ]Department of Kinesiology, 115 Ramsey, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602, USA
                [18 ]Menzies Research Institute, Medical Science 1, 17 Liverpool Street, University of Tasmania, Hobart TAS 7000, Australia
                [19 ]UKCRC Centre for Public Health (NI), Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Queen's University, Belfast, Ireland
                [20 ]Departments of Exercise Science and Epidemiology/Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA
                Article
                1479-5868-8-80
                10.1186/1479-5868-8-80
                3169444
                21798044
                1e0f6b9c-6969-473c-8dfa-dc405f108060
                Copyright ©2011 Tudor-Locke et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 November 2010
                : 28 July 2011
                Categories
                Review

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                Nutrition & Dietetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article