9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The purpose of this study was to develop an accurate, reliable and easily applicable method for determining the anatomical location of the joint line during revision knee arthroplasty.

          Methods

          The transepicondylar width (TEW), the perpendicular distance between the medial and lateral epicondyles and the distal articular surfaces (DMAD, DLAD) and the distance between the medial and lateral epicondyles and the posterior articular surfaces (PMAD, DLAD) were measured in 40 knees from 20 formalin-fixed adult cadavers (11 male and nine female; mean age at death 56.9 years, sd 9.4; 34 to 69). The ratios of the DMAD, PMAD, DLAD and PLAD to TEW were calculated.

          Results

          The mean TEW, DMAD, PMAD, DLAD and PLAD were 82.76 mm (standard deviation ( sd) 7.74), 28.95 mm ( sd 3.3), 28.57 mm ( sd 3), 23.97 mm ( sd 3.27) and 24.42 mm ( sd 3.14), respectively. The ratios between the TEW and the articular distances (DMAD/TEW, DLAD/TEW, PMAD/TEW and PLAD/TEW) were calculated and their means were 0.35 ( sd 0.02), 0.34 ( sd 0.02), 0.28 ( sd 0.03) and 0.29 ( sd 0.03), respectively.

          Conclusion

          This method provides a simple, reproducible and reliable technique enabling accurate anatomical joint line restoration during revision total knee arthroplasty.

          Cite this article: B. Ozkurt, T. Sen, D. Cankaya, S. Kendir, K. Basarır, Y. Tabak. The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:280–286. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.57.BJR-2016-0002.R1.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus.

          Most knee surgeons have believed during TKA neutral mechanical alignment should be restored. A number of patients may exist, however, for whom neutral mechanical alignment is abnormal. Patients with so-called "constitutional varus" knees have had varus alignment since they reached skeletal maturity. Restoring neutral alignment in these cases may in fact be abnormal and undesirable and would likely require some degree of medial soft tissue release to achieve neutral alignment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

            Background Surgeon-dependent factors such as optimal implant alignment are thought to play a significant role in outcome following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Exact definitions and references for optimal alignment are, however, still being debated. This overview of the literature describes different definitions of component alignment following primary TKA for (1) tibiofemoral alignment in the AP plane, (2) tibial and femoral component placement in the AP plane, (3) tibial and femoral component placement in the sagittal plane, and (4) rotational alignment of tibial and femoral components and their role in outcome and implant survival. Methods We performed a literature search for original and review articles on implant positioning following primary TKA. Definitions for coronal, sagittal, and rotational placement of femoral and tibial components were summarized and the influence of positioning on survival and functional outcome was considered. Results Many definitions exist when evaluating placement of femoral and tibial components. Implant alignment plays a role in both survival and functional outcome following primary TKA, as component malalignment can lead to increased failure rates, maltracking, and knee pain. Interpretation Based on currently available evidence, surgeons should aim for optimal alignment of tibial and femoral components when performing TKA.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanical, Anatomical, and Kinematic Axis in TKA: Concepts and Practical Applications.

              Successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has often been based on the restoration of the knee to neutral alignment postoperatively. Numerous reports have linked malaligned TKA components to increased wear, poor functional outcomes, and failure. There have been many different alignment philosophies and surgical techniques that have been established to attain the goal of proper alignment, which includes such techniques as computerized navigation, and custom cutting guides. In addition, these methods could potentially have the added benefit of leading to improved functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. In this report, we have reviewed and analyzed recent reports concerning mechanical, anatomic, and kinematic axis/alignment schemes used in total knee arthroplasty.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Associate Professor
                Role: Associate Professor
                Role: Staff Surgeon
                Role: Medical Doctor
                Role: Associate Professor
                Role: Associate Professor
                Journal
                Bone Joint Res
                BJR
                bjres
                Bone & Joint Research
                2046-3758
                July 2016
                22 July 2016
                : 5
                : 7
                : 280-286
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Orthopaedic Department, Ankara Numune Research and Training Hospital, Talatpasa Bulvarı Samanpazarı Ankara, Turkey
                [2 ]School of Medicine Anatomy Department Ankara University, Sıhhiye Ankara, Turkey
                Author notes
                [*]Mr B. Ozkurt; email: bulentozkurt@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                10.1302_2046-3758.57.BJR-2016-0002.R1
                10.1302/2046-3758.57.BJR-2016-0002.R1
                4969630
                27388715
                1e28349d-ca71-4a8a-a2a2-9c23c7e6ae56
                © 2016 Ozkurt et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 29 March 2016
                : 9 May 2016
                Categories
                Knee
                2
                Knee
                Joint Line
                Arthroplasty
                Cadaver
                Revision Arthroplasty

                knee,joint line,arthroplasty,cadaver,revision arthroplasty
                knee, joint line, arthroplasty, cadaver, revision arthroplasty

                Comments

                Comment on this article