Chemistry,
as part of the STEM
(Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) disciplines, is
one of many areas where women’s potential is often still being
“STEMmed”. In other words, women receive fewer opportunities
both as students and in leadership positions, and hence the entire
community loses out on this vast pool of talent. This ACS
Omega
Virtual Issue on “Women at
the Forefront of Chemistry” is our way to celebrate
women’s talent in chemistry and its interfacing areas by giving
the floor to 50 outstanding women scientists from all over the world
who have published in ACS Omega as corresponding
authors.
It is well-known that women are under-represented in
the STEMs.
1
The data presented in the latest
report “She
Figures 2018,” one of a series of publications released since
2003 by the European Commission, offer an overview of gender (in)equality
in Research and Innovation at the pan-European level. In most European
Union countries examined, while the percentage of STEM female Ph.D.
graduates between 2013 and 2016 grew slightly in fields such as biological
sciences, environmental science, and information and communication
technologies, their numbers grew at a lower rate compared to their
male counterparts in several other STEM fields. The document additionally
shows that the proportion of women becomes smaller and smaller, as
they climb the academic career ladder. While this disparity does not
only apply to STEMs, the gender gap here is even more severe, where
the numbers reveal the following: women make up 32% of students and
36% of B.Sc. and M.Sc. graduates, and they make up 37% of Ph.D. students
and 39% of Ph.D. graduates. As they move into academic careers, they
make up 35% assistant, 28% associate, and 15% full professors, respectively.
The percentage of women full professors in Europe for all the disciplines
in 2016 was 24%. In 2013, these latter figures were lower, at 14%
for the STEMs and 22% for all disciplines. So, while the gender gap
in the academic leadership positions has reduced, this is progressing
slowly, and gender parity remains far from balanced.
The increase
of the share of women full professors since 2003 and
over the last three years might indicate that the gender gap will
close fairly quickly in Europe.
1
However, prominent studies on a broader global scale
are not that optimistic. For instance, The Global Gender Gap Report
2017
3
stated that, globally, gender parity
is shifting into reverse this year for the first time since the World
Economic Forum started measuring it and states more specifically “on
current trends, the overall global gender gap can be closed in exactly
100 years across the 106 countries covered since the inception of
the Report, compared to 83 years last year”. Additionally,
the same report suggests that with the continued widening of the economic
gender gap it will now not be closed for another 217 years.
3
Along the same lines, a report by the United
Nations Development
Programme Gender Social Norms Index,
4
published
in 2020 that gathers data from 75 countries, covering over 80% of
the world’s populations, highlights how the progress toward
gender equality is slowing down since 2013. The world is not on track
to achieve gender equality by 2030, as foreseen 25 years ago by the
Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.
4
More regretfully, the analysis reveals that despite decades of progress
close to 90% of men and women hold some degree of bias against women,
thus suggesting that there still are invisible barriers that women
face in achieving equality.
4
Without
the pretense to be able to analyze in the short space of
an Editorial, the complex reasons why this is happening, the low share
of women full professors in European academia, and their slight increase
in the last three years call for two comments. The first observation
is that very few women reach top academic positions. It is noteworthy
that there is a similar occurrence with roughly the same share, in
many different sectors of civil society, from public administration
to the magistracy and in the private sector. This means that the talents
of a large fraction of women that are not given the opportunity to
sit in decision-making bodies and/or to shape a research group activity
according to their own vision are lost. It is therefore not surprising
that a variety of models and empirical studies suggest that improving
gender parity may result in significant economic dividends, which
vary depending on the situation of different economies and the specific
challenges they are facing. The world as a whole could increase global
Gross Domestic Product by US$5.3 trillion by 2025 by closing the gender
gap in economic participation by 25% over the same period.
3
Second, and importantly for this Editorial,
increasing the number
of women in leadership positions could enhance the “role-modeling”
influence on younger women so that they consider leadership roles
to be achievable and are encouraged to strive for them. For this reason,
in my role as an Associate Editor at this scientific journal, ACS Omega, I advocate
that everyone make an effort to shine
a light on successful women in STEM, as in a sort of giant virtual
resonator. Here, ACS Omega showcases the contributions
to the chemistry enterprise of 50 brilliant women scientists from
all over the world, some at the beginning of their career and some
already established. We hope to inspire other women, and men as well,
to think of Chemistry and STEM subjects as fields where everyone can
contribute fruitfully and encourage those in decision-making positions
to implement concrete actions aimed at speeding up the closing of
the gender gap in research and innovation.